BBO Discussion Forums: High-level decision with 4 trumps in both suits - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

High-level decision with 4 trumps in both suits

Poll: Imps fav. AJxx Jxxx x 98xx. 1S P 2S 3H; 4D ? (17 member(s) have cast votes)

Imps fav. AJxx Jxxx x 98xx. 1S P 2S 3H; 4D ?

  1. Pass, then pass 4S (2 votes [11.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.76%

  2. Pass, then double 4S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Pass, but back in with 5H over their 4S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. 4H, then pass 4S (7 votes [41.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 41.18%

  5. 4H, then double 4S (1 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

  6. 4H, then 5H over 4S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  7. 5H, then pass if they bid 5S (3 votes [17.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.65%

  8. 5H, then double if they bid 5S (4 votes [23.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.53%

  9. 5H, then 6H if they bid 5S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  10. Other (Please Explain) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   kfgauss 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 322
  • Joined: 2003-August-15
  • Location:USA

Posted 2006-May-05, 13:26

Imps, favorable. You hold:

AJxx Jxxx x 98xx.

RHO deals: 1S P 2S 3H; 4D ?

(RHO's 4D needn't be a slam try and is likely just showing a suit to help with competitive decisions.)

What's your bid? What do you do if they compete further in spades?
0

#2 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,417
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-May-05, 13:40

Pass

Playing OBAR, 3H at fav vul could very weak and need not be that long. 3H was not a suggestion for a sacrifice. Of course I tend to Sac too little at Imps, this may be one reason why. :ph34r:
0

#3 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2006-May-05, 14:02

I am never bidding 5♥, no or later, and would not consider 6♥ either. I do have 4♠ including the master trump. Assuming we can force declarer to ruff a heart, then later I can hold off ♠ ace to the right time, and maybe force another ♥ ruff and have the master trump (the ace of trumps is more powerful when you can use it to control timing for a force).

Sometimes you will not want to show support in an effort to keep fthem from guessing at shortness in your suit in one or the other fo their hands. Here, I really have no great fear of 6♠ (yes it might make, but I am willing to take my chances), so letting them know about their fit is not something I will lose sleep over. So for me, I will bid 4♥, which on the surface hardly gets in their way at all. If they are going to bid 4♠ and if they stop to double 4♥'s fine, I will live with that. But I will bid 4♥ for the simple reason it prevents west from cue-bidding 4♥. Sure he can make a forcing pass and then pull a double to express slam interest, but 4♥ does muddle up their free and easy communication.

I am not bidding 5♥ because this is imps, and partner couldn't bid 2♥ or even 3♥ over 1♠. Even if it is only down three, that will not win much at imps, and I could imagine it going down more than three.
--Ben--

#4 User is offline   Elianna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,437
  • Joined: 2004-August-29
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Switzerland

Posted 2006-May-05, 14:05

inquiry, on May 5 2006, 12:02 PM, said:

I am not bidding 5♥ because this is imps, and partner couldn't bid 2♥ or even 3♥ over 1♠. Even if it is only down three, that will not win much at imps, and I could imagine it going down more than three.

As a possible reason partner couldn't bid over 1♠ would be that she would be bidding out of turn, I'll let her off the hook for that one.
My addiction to Mario Bros #3 has come back!
0

#5 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2006-May-05, 14:08

Elianna, on May 5 2006, 03:05 PM, said:

inquiry, on May 5 2006, 12:02 PM, said:

I am not bidding 5♥ because this is imps, and partner couldn't bid 2♥ or even 3♥ over 1♠. Even if it is only down three, that will not win much at imps, and I could imagine it going down more than three.

As a possible reason partner couldn't bid over 1♠ would be that she would be bidding out of turn, I'll let her off the hook for that one.

You are much too kind... I never let them off with such a flimsy excuse... . :blink:
--Ben--

#6 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2006-May-05, 17:48

i'd bid 4♥ and then pass 4♠... 4♥ probably won't get doubled with them hesitant to miss a vul game
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#7 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2006-May-08, 02:23

3 Heart looks like a more constructive bid then 4 Heart, so Pd may (or may not) have defensive values.
I bid 4 Heart and double 4 Spade. I have as much defensive value as I need for this double. If pd had bid on x,KQTxxxx,xxx,xx, he should be allowed to take the double out to 5 Heart.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users