How do You play 6♠ at imps with the ♣K lead?
Play problem
#2
Posted 2006-May-03, 08:58
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#3
Posted 2006-May-03, 09:03
If memory servers me right missnig six to the JACK, the odds favor banging AKQ instead of hook, and I doubt two known ♣ (KQ) with WEST change those odds. So, I win ♣A, play ♥A and ruff a ♥, then play ♠ from the top. Now if I catch doubleton or tripleton ♠Jack I am home free. At matchpoints I would consider forgoing the ♥ ruff, and win the ♣A and paly ♠ from the topm but inthe final analysis I would still play that way as few will probably reach slam, and those that do might well end up in 6♦. So making will be more important than worrying about down one versus down a zillion.
#4
Posted 2006-May-03, 09:47
inquiry, on May 3 2006, 04:03 PM, said:
An immediate hook is quite attractive though because of the possibility of a misdefence if it loses - will LHO find a trump return? I wonder whether this might be the right practical line depending on who LHO is. No doubt that your line is better in theory though.
#5
Posted 2006-May-03, 09:59
david_c, on May 3 2006, 10:47 AM, said:
inquiry, on May 3 2006, 04:03 PM, said:
An immediate hook is quite attractive though because of the possibility of a misdefence if it loses - will LHO find a trump return? I wonder whether this might be the right practical line depending on who LHO is. No doubt that your line is better in theory though.
The immediate hook works only if EAST didn't give count on trick one. If he did, the ♠ back kills any chance other than some extraordinarily and almost mathematically eliminated squeeze chances.
#6
Posted 2006-May-03, 10:13
inquiry, on May 3 2006, 04:59 PM, said:
david_c, on May 3 2006, 10:47 AM, said:
inquiry, on May 3 2006, 04:03 PM, said:
An immediate hook is quite attractive though because of the possibility of a misdefence if it loses - will LHO find a trump return? I wonder whether this might be the right practical line depending on who LHO is. No doubt that your line is better in theory though.
The immediate hook works only if EAST didn't give count on trick one. If he did, the ♠ back kills any chance other than some extraordinarily and almost mathematically eliminated squeeze chances.
Hehehe, yes I realise that of course. Still I don't think many people at my local club would play a spade back, signal or no signal. But the possibility of a bad diamond break would probably put me off anyway. If I had the ♦T rather than the ♦8 I'd be really tempted ...
#7
Posted 2006-May-03, 10:18
Since cashing spades from top makes it about 61% of the time, I guess that's what I'll do.
#8
Posted 2006-May-03, 10:28
whereagles, on May 3 2006, 11:18 AM, said:
Since cashing spades from top makes it about 61% of the time, I guess that's what I'll do.
61% is too high, because singleton JACK is not useful for you. Also you have to factor in probably 11 spaces in WEST and 13 spaces in EAST. But 3-3 or 4=2 stiff jack is still better odds than hook.
#9
Posted 2006-May-03, 10:32
inquiry, on May 3 2006, 05:03 PM, said:
Well, the alternative is to ruff one more heart, along Codo's line above. Then you also make when the opponent with ♠Jxxx has 2 or 3 hearts, but go down when someone with ♠xx can overruff in hearts. Since the latter seems less likely, I think Codo's line is superior.
Arend
#10
Posted 2006-May-03, 10:53
inquiry, on May 3 2006, 04:28 PM, said:
huh? 61% is...
36%, all 3-3 breaks
16%, 1/3 of 4-2 breaks
hum.. oops, you're right. It's 52%.
Well, then that immediate trump hook suddently looks more attractive. It's 50% right off the bat and becomes close to 100% if LHO wins but fails to shoot back a trump.
#11
Posted 2006-May-03, 10:58
at this point you have 10 tricks in the bag (assuming no overruffs), and if spades were 3-3, you can claim the rest. If spades arent 3-3, you still have the chance that the hand that has 4 spades also has 3+ diamonds to score two more diamond tricks.
If anything is likely to be overruffed, it is the 3rd round of hearts, which may be RHO's natural trump trick from Jxxx. Hopefully, this hand will not have another club to force you with. You can still win his return and draw the remaining trumps (assuming no worse than 4-2).
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#13
Posted 2006-May-04, 00:45
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...

Help
