BBO Discussion Forums: RKCB Variations - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

RKCB Variations

#1 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2003-November-06, 20:52

Early this week, pd and I bid the following to 6C.

AQTxx
Kxx
x
K9xx

K
Axx
AKQx
A8xxx

This was MP and 6N stole the bickies. The problem was that I was unable to read a 3H bid by pd as showing the K or a singleton. I was trying to figure out some method for distiguishing the difference, when I came across the following RKCB variant as played by some Polish pairs.

My questions are:

Has anyone here played this?
Even if you haven't, can anyone see obvious advs/disadvs with this method?

Step responses

0-3 KC
1-4 KC
2 KC + 0-3 Kings
2 KC + 1-4 Kings
2 KC + 2 Kings

After these the next step asks for the trump Q

Comments?
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#2 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2003-November-07, 04:52

First a remark: if you play RKC, you don't have 4 kings left, only 3. So it should be something like:
0/3
1/4
2/5 + 0/3 kings
2/5 + 1 king
2/5 + 2 kings

This actually seems like a version of roman blackwood (that I play when no trump is set), but with keycards in stead of aces... The difference is that showing kings with roman blackwood is 40/1/23 and there are 4 kings.

This RKCB is nice, but I guess it's purpose isn't usefull enough for every slam ambition in a suit. Imo the normal RKCB is better.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#3 User is offline   lenze 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 163
  • Joined: 2003-March-31
  • Location:Montana

Posted 2003-November-07, 10:09

Quote

Early this week, pd and I bid the following to 6C.

AQTxx
Kxx
x
K9xx

K
Axx
AKQx
A8xxx

This was MP and 6N stole the bickies. The problem was that I was unable to read a 3H bid by pd as showing the K or a singleton. I was trying to figure out some method for distiguishing the difference, when I came across the following RKCB variant as played by some Polish pairs.

My questions are:

Has anyone here played this?
Even if you haven't, can anyone see obvious advs/disadvs with this method?

Step responses

0-3 KC
1-4 KC
2 KC + 0-3 Kings
2 KC + 1-4 Kings
2 KC + 2 Kings

After these the next step asks for the trump Q

Comments?


Actually this makes a lot of sense, but as Free points out, there are only 3 Kings left. New thought!! What if you counted the trump Q as a king. Now there would be four kings left and you would no longer need the trump Q ask. Just a thought
Please do not complain about my opinion. I don't have the time to convince you I'm right.
0

#4 User is offline   mishovnbg 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 769
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:Bulgaria, Varna
  • Interests:Bridge - new bidding systems, psyches; Computers - education, service, program; Computer games great fan :-)

Posted 2003-November-07, 23:25

Hi Ron!
Try to play 4NT as even KC, skip it with odd KC. This is best way in my opinion, same in competition. Remaining bids below 5 of trump are used for establising Q trump or grand. Example:

AQJ10xxxx Kx
xxx Ax
x QJxx
x AKQxx

4SP 5CL(1)
5DI(2) 5HE(3)
6SP(4)


1. cue, odd KC, here 3 ofcourse
2. cue, KC enough for slam
3. No Q trump or cue for grand
4. Q trump, KC not enough for grand
Misho
MishoVnBg
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users