BBO Discussion Forums: What now? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What now? MP Decision

Poll: What is your second action? (19 member(s) have cast votes)

What is your second action?

  1. Pass (15 votes [78.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 78.95%

  2. Double (3 votes [15.79%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.79%

  3. Bid 4NT (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Bid 5D (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. Bid 5H (1 votes [5.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.26%

  6. Other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2006-April-23, 21:07

Scoring: MP


After a 1 opening to your right, you bid whichever of 1/2/3/4 (or pass) seems appropriate. (BTW -- which is your choice at these colors???)

LHO then bids spades at the cheapest level possible, jumping to 2 as "intermediate" (8-11) if you simply overcall 1. Opener, if possible, raises to 4.

Now what?
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#2 User is offline   JohnnyH7 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 54
  • Joined: 2006-March-17

Posted 2006-April-23, 21:13

3H then pass.
0

#3 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,071
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-April-23, 21:48

1) 1H
2) x over 4s for a club lead I hope.
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2006-April-24, 03:40

Given the circumstances, a 7 HEart opening had worked best. I have an easy X of 7 Spade. At the table, I had bid 3 , but without knowing, what will eb best.
At another day I had bid 1 or 4 HEart or pass.

After 3 Heart, a double of 4 Spade should be nice, even if most pards tend not to understand this.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-April-24, 03:43

Sorry, but this poll does not make any sense. After 1-3-3-P-4, the situation is completely different than after 1-1-2-P-4.
In fact, that's why I bid 3, because then I am done with the hand.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#6 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-April-24, 03:44

Codo, on Apr 24 2006, 11:40 AM, said:

After 3 Heart, a double of 4 Spade should be nice, even if most pards tend not to understand this.

So what does a double of 4 show in your opinion?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#7 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-April-24, 07:11

With the info given, I bid 1 for the lead :)

Without any info I guess I'd bid 3, though not fully happy about it.
0

#8 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2006-April-24, 07:46

cherdano, on Apr 24 2006, 06:44 PM, said:

Codo, on Apr 24 2006, 11:40 AM, said:

After 3 Heart, a double of 4 Spade should be nice, even if most pards tend not to understand this.

So what does a double of 4 show in your opinion?

I agree, the double must be lead directing for clubs, but this works in the forum much better then at the table.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#9 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,060
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-April-24, 08:08

2H and Pass.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#10 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2006-April-24, 08:56

Torn between 2 and 1. At matchpoints, I think I would try 2. I am finished after this, given the vulnerabilty.
--Ben--

#11 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2006-April-24, 08:57

2; but this is the kind of hand where I might take another call if pard can dredge up a raise.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#12 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-April-24, 09:11

pclayton, on Apr 24 2006, 02:57 PM, said:

2; but this is the kind of hand where I might take another call if pard can dredge up a raise.

Thinking about it.. this is probably the best way to deal with this hand. The 'further action' might be some lead-director in diams or clubs.
0

#13 User is offline   jdeegan 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Joined: 2005-August-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Economics
    Finance
    Bridge bidding theory
    Cooking
    Downhill skiing

Posted 2006-April-24, 12:24

:) 2 and Pass. :) The very idea of bidding again over 4 after a 2 overcall smacks of a loser's desperation mentality. No doubt it would have worked on this hand, else we wouldn't be seeing this so-called 'bidding problem'. Assuming that our side should have bid beyond 4, it strikes me that the blame, if any, likely falls on my partner, given that I bid 1 or 2 the first time. Bridge is a game of percentages, and one cannot expect to achieve the best possible result on every hand esp. when there is a competitive auction.
0

#14 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2006-April-24, 22:29

In practice, I doubled, expecting this to be cooperative, suggesting a great ability to handle (1) a club lead, (2) a 5H call, or (3) a 5D call. If partner passes, we take the first six tricks [club lead ruffed, heart back high, diamond switch through Kxxx on dummy, diamond #2, diamond ruff, club ruff]. Partner, instead, elected 5H, which made on a sympathized error from the opponents.

In reviewing the hand, a friend also said he would double if his partner was a "better player," but he elected to pass for a real poor result. Another semi-pro friend also claimed he would double.

I found this interesting because my double, at the time, was made because I was primarily curious as to whether it would work and was willing to risk the board for the bet. I am not sure whether the law of averages would support this action over the course of hundreds of deals.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#15 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2006-April-25, 02:43

I'm still trying to figure out how several people suddenly play Lightner doubles at the game level and expect their partner to be playing the same.

You can play "action" doubles if you like, but I don't see why this greatly effects partner's lead other than his knowing you now have greater strength (than you actually have).
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#16 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2006-April-25, 04:45

Actually, I wrote, that I like the Lightner idea, esp. in case like this one: With 2/3 or even with 4 HEart, you limited your hand. You normally will and must just sit and wait the later development in the bidding. You will "never" double. So, this double can and should show something significant, normally a void in dummies suit.
And I wrote, that I won`t use this bid, because pd tend to misunderstand.
But the idea is still great.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#17 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-April-25, 05:16

If you overcall 4H you have not limited your hand in anything like the same way, so many people play 4H and then double as simply showing extra values.

If I overcall 3H and double I still play this as 'action': saying "I didn't overcall more because I wasn't suitable the first time round, e.g. because I didn't have enough hearts and I had a 2-suiter, but now I want to bid over 4S unless you want to defend". It would tend to have a spade void.

But this is related to my 2-suited overcalls, where I don't have a bid to show hearts and diamonds over a 1C opening, so a 0652 is a not impossible shape on this auction.

I can't imagine an auction where I overcall 2H then double, though I think it will have to be a 2-suiter.
0

#18 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2006-April-25, 09:24

I'm with Matt on this. Lightner Xs of 4M don't exist.

I also play like Frances. Preempting and then Xing says I have extra offense and am not willing to defend 4S undoubled. This does not apply to a 4M bid which could be a very good hand that deemed it better to preempt and give up on an unlikely slam.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users