Posted 2006-April-24, 22:29
In practice, I doubled, expecting this to be cooperative, suggesting a great ability to handle (1) a club lead, (2) a 5H call, or (3) a 5D call. If partner passes, we take the first six tricks [club lead ruffed, heart back high, diamond switch through Kxxx on dummy, diamond #2, diamond ruff, club ruff]. Partner, instead, elected 5H, which made on a sympathized error from the opponents.
In reviewing the hand, a friend also said he would double if his partner was a "better player," but he elected to pass for a real poor result. Another semi-pro friend also claimed he would double.
I found this interesting because my double, at the time, was made because I was primarily curious as to whether it would work and was willing to risk the board for the bet. I am not sure whether the law of averages would support this action over the course of hundreds of deals.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.