Many way to reach competition
#1
Posted 2006-February-22, 20:03
p p 1♥ DB
P ?
the hand which i hold:
Q86
AJT92
9853
4
Many choice to me now:pass/1NT/2♦/1♠,they are all the possible practical bidding.but , which is the best?
commentate if u want,thanks.
this is the actual question appeared on the fujian province(china),ilka effector will be started by each way.
I will proceed after this question.
regards
#3 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-February-22, 22:29
#5
Posted 2006-February-23, 02:56
Jlall, on Feb 23 2006, 05:29 AM, said:
Joker style : no, no ! LOL
I should take the risk to pass at MP but will definitively bid 1NT at imps.
Alain
#6
Posted 2006-February-23, 04:28
#8
Posted 2006-February-23, 05:39
#9
Posted 2006-February-23, 07:43
#10 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-February-23, 09:00
joker_gib, on Feb 23 2006, 03:56 AM, said:
Alain
This seems strange to me. A pass is MUCH riskier in MP. In MP -160 will likely be a zero. At imps, you haven't lost much. Like if youre going set a trick in 1N, you will only lose a couple of imps anyways. Granted the reward is also higher in MP, but I do not see a pass as risky at all in imps. We aren't Xing them into game.
#11
Posted 2006-February-23, 13:56
Love to punish 3rd seat trash when I can.
#12
Posted 2006-February-23, 19:48
the 1st table (they name it main table) is a pair of sibling,they learnd bridge from 1991 and study it 5hours per day during 2001-2004,and win the 2005 in their province.
the younger north bid the 1♠,then following:
p p 1♥ DB
P 1♠ P 2♦
P 2♥ P 3♣
P 3N P 4♠
P ?
Would you jump to 6♦ as the younger brother did?i will provide 4hand after this.would you help them to analyse?thanks.
regards
#14
Posted 2006-February-27, 16:34
#15
Posted 2006-February-28, 01:15
If I choose not to pass (say with worse intermediates) I prefer to bid 1♠, though. It is the most sure fit, and I don't want to crucify partner if his double comes from 4-1-3-5 (not to say from 4-2-2-5, which is a possibility).
I'm bringing a honor in spades, 1 A and ruffing values in clubs. Iwould not refuse playing 4♠ in a Moysian fit, if partner is strong enough
#16
Posted 2006-February-28, 06:07
However, I don't like the 2H cue-bid-followed-by-3NT continuation. Advancer has a great hand for diamonds and he probably has not shown his fit yet. This sequence seems to me not particularly encouraging in exploring diamonds slam. I guess cue-bid is strength showing & seeking H stopper (default meaning of cue bid), & 3NT express doubt about the strain (contrast with direct 3NT leap). Though maybe played otherwise, I am sure mort random expert partnership would define the sequence this way. If the meaning of cue bid is fit-showing, then every bid seems reasonable(except the agreements, how does the pair explore 3NT if lacking a general-strength showing cue)
I think if advancer splinter 4C over 2D, then the slam will be reached more effortlessly.
Btw, if I were doubler, I would bid 2S over 2H, as I will not hide 3-card major support for long.

Help

make it