BBO Discussion Forums: Partscore battle lost at MP: improvements? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Partscore battle lost at MP: improvements?

Poll: Who/when should have bid ? (45 member(s) have cast votes)

Who/when should have bid ?

  1. W should DBL 1st round (5 votes [11.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.11%

  2. W should bid 1NT 1st round (4 votes [8.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.89%

  3. W should DBL 2nd round (5 votes [11.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.11%

  4. E should have balanced (9 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  5. Nevermind, just an unfortunate hand (19 votes [42.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.22%

  6. Other (3 votes [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-January-24, 09:50

The perfect hand to let partner decide! When you don't double, pard will only balance with a 5+ card suit which is exactly what you need at the 2 level. When you double and his only 4 card suit is theirs, yuck and double yuck.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#22 User is offline   adhoc3 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 2005-September-16

Posted 2006-January-24, 22:09

Gerben42, on Jan 24 2006, 09:50 AM, said:

Quote

The worst result we could get is 1NTX+1


What about 1NT xx +1 ? I think doubling 1NT is crazy.

If West has 10, opps would have made a positive move. If West has 13+, not, but then he is likely not to have 4, maybe not even 3. Pass!

I mean west double 1NT, not east. I think east should have a reason to let go 1NT dbl.

1C--pass--1H--pass
1NT-dbl---pass-???

or

1C--pass--1H---pass
1NT-dbl---redbl--???

Pard run to 2x, dbled, -1, it's ok; -2, sadly; -3.... if opps dont have a game, I'll buy a drink for pard:)

I'm a optimist when have something in hand.
0

#23 User is offline   AceOfHeart 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 104
  • Joined: 2004-February-04

Posted 2006-January-29, 20:40

i bid semi crazily in mp and non vul, i would overcalled 1S ,it seems there is not such an option ;)
Make love, not war
0

#24 User is offline   Kalvan14 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 839
  • Joined: 2005-October-20

Posted 2006-January-29, 23:03

IMHO, 99% would double for t/o with AQxx Jxx KJX Kxx. While the posted hand is not exactly the same, I'd submit that there is a 3-card fit in any suit, and the hand strength is reasonable.

The problem is that if you don't double at the first opportunity, you'll never have an opportunity to show your values (doubling after (1)-P-(1)-P-(1N) is like playing russian roulette: may give a thrill, but it is not survival-oriented).

I strongly disagree with the idea that E might overcall 1 with 1: pre-emption value zero, lead value uncertain (if oppos end up playing in NT, do you really want a lead in spades?), infos conveyed to partner minimal (ok, I've probably 5 spades, and maybe something between 4 and 17 points). Even a balancing with E hand (which is less outrageous than an overcall) is predicated on partnership agreements: if partner passes with clubs values and a balanced hand weaker than a strong NT...).
0

#25 User is offline   JSilver 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: 2003-March-23
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 2006-January-29, 23:51

Since 1NT can be set, and making 2 needs a bunch of things to go right, I don't see that E-W did anything wrong in the auction.
"Violence is the last resort of the incompetent." --Isaac Asimov
0

#26 User is offline   JSilver 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: 2003-March-23
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 2006-January-30, 00:03

BTW, South might've rebid 2. Now a balance by East becomes more reasonable. Perhaps that's why this board may not have been a matchpoint success.
"Violence is the last resort of the incompetent." --Isaac Asimov
0

#27 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-January-30, 04:53

Ok, so you lost a part-score battle. I'm sure the rest of the field didn't do much better, no? :)
0

#28 User is offline   jdeegan 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Joined: 2005-August-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Economics
    Finance
    Bridge bidding theory
    Cooking
    Downhill skiing

Posted 2006-January-30, 15:33

:) Too bad. Double dummy you can beat 1NT by two tricks for +200.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users