Preempt with two aces? First seat favorable, IMPs
#1
Posted 2005-October-26, 02:04
White vs Red, first seat, you hold
♠AT9xxxx
♥ATxx
♦x
♣x
At these colors, you play 3♠ as a trash preempt (weaker than 2♠) so this hand is far too strong for that. Your options are as described in the poll.
The post mortem is not interesting but I thought it could have been.
#2
Posted 2005-October-26, 02:59
The potential in offense is obvious, and we have 2 defensive tricks.
#3
Posted 2005-October-26, 03:03
In my partnership, the only alternative I see is 1♠ cause I also have 4♥ but I will pass this one and try to come back later.
Alain
#4
Posted 2005-October-26, 03:39
#5
Posted 2005-October-26, 04:47
#6
Posted 2005-October-26, 05:01
What else?
The hand is to weak to bid 1S,
followed by 4S, and who claimed,
that 4S cant contain two defencive
tricks?
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2005-October-26, 05:02
#8
Posted 2005-October-26, 07:08
P_Marlowe, on Oct 26 2005, 01:01 PM, said:
Well, if your normal 4♠ preempts have 2 aces, only 7 cards and 4♥ then I agree
Alain
#9
Posted 2005-October-26, 07:35
#10
Posted 2005-October-26, 07:57
#12
Posted 2005-October-26, 08:51
#13
Posted 2005-October-26, 09:27
#14
Posted 2005-October-26, 09:58
Tysen
#15
Posted 2005-October-26, 10:05
Some light openers open 1S with 25 Zar, this hand has 29 Zar, and that doesn't even count the good spots. I wonder where in the world this doesn't count as a sound opening.
- hrothgar
#16
Posted 2005-October-26, 10:07
Hannie, on Oct 26 2005, 12:05 PM, said:
Some light openers open 1S with 25 Zar, this hand has 29 Zar, and that doesn't even count the good spots. I wonder where in the world this doesn't count as a sound opening.
What he said.
1♠ and then show extras if asked......
#18
Posted 2005-October-26, 11:02
tysen2k, on Oct 26 2005, 05:58 PM, said:
That's excatly what I thought. After I opened 4♠, passed out, ten tricks. But as I said, the post-mortem was not so interesting, any road would lead to 4♠.
#19
Posted 2005-October-26, 11:17
4 Spades for me
I readily admit that there are a lot of reasons not to open 4♠. My suit quality ain't that great. I have two bullets. I have a side 4 card major. Hell. I have the master suit.
With this said and done, "Swans" normally play much better in their long suit.
Moreover, the simple, direct auction places the opponents under the most pressure. Plus, I can't stand to pass and I consider 1♠ a much worse misrepresentation playing a standard system.
#20
Posted 2005-October-26, 11:37
tysen2k, on Oct 26 2005, 04:58 PM, said:
Preventing the opponents from finding a game isn't the only advantage of pre-empting. They might also bid at the five level when it's wrong for them to do so.
I think I'd open 1♠ on some days and 4♠ on others.

Help
