Tough balancing Playing IMP
#2
Posted 2005-October-19, 04:39
#3
Posted 2005-October-19, 04:55
There's something to be said for pass on this sort of hand. Declarer will usually struggle to make 1S here.
All things considered, I think I'll pass
#4
Posted 2005-October-19, 05:08
#5
Posted 2005-October-19, 05:09
2♣ or 2♦ really mis-states the hand. 1NT is a huge underbid. Double looks right, treating the hand as a standard strong no trump, except that it goes wrong when partner bids too many hearts. Pass is the only really viable alternative, but at these colours I'm too worried about collecting 50s against our game. Which leaves me with the slight overbid of 2NT.
#6
Posted 2005-October-19, 05:10
#7
Posted 2005-October-19, 06:43
GBB
so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.
#8
Posted 2005-October-19, 07:50
Regardless of the method, pass can be a winner here. Especially if LHO has hearts.
#9 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-October-19, 08:05
#10
Posted 2005-October-19, 08:32
Blofeld, on Oct 19 2005, 01:09 PM, said:
Hmm. If partner jumps to 3♥, I see nothing wrong with playing 3NT. Now ok, if he jumps to 4♥, I have to say "vglp", but is that at all likely?
Arend
#11
Posted 2005-October-19, 08:58
Chamaco, on Oct 19 2005, 06:08 AM, said:
Ditto, I fully expect a H bid from pard and will bid 2NT to show my 15-18 hcp hand.
#12
Posted 2005-October-19, 09:00
Jlall, on Oct 19 2005, 09:05 AM, said:
I believe that 2NT shows the 19-20 hcp hand. With x,xx,HHxxx,HHHxx what is the best bid to show the minors?
#13 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-October-19, 09:53
Al_U_Card, on Oct 19 2005, 10:00 AM, said:
Jlall, on Oct 19 2005, 09:05 AM, said:
I believe that 2NT shows the 19-20 hcp hand. With x,xx,HHxxx,HHHxx what is the best bid to show the minors?
I agree with you (though I'd say a good 18-20 probably).
With the minors you just have to bid one then the other. With a (very) strong hand you have to start with a X unless you have the agreement that a cuebid is ANY strong 2 suiter in balancing seat.
#14
Posted 2005-October-19, 10:42
Winston
#16
Posted 2005-October-19, 12:12
1N is merely a poor compromise between pass and showing our hand: it trades 50 a trick for the joy of playing 1N too often
Double and then bid some number (low as possible) of NT seems the best of a bad lot.
Partner will not commit to 4♥ without 6 of them, and maybe we have a play opposite that holding.
My main worry is that we have little defence to 4♥ by them!
The only alternative is 2N immediately. I like that to be 19-20, and this hand should be downgraded, not upgraded. I do not think that 2N will prompt partner to insist upon ♥ any more than my double/NT sequence. But it will prompt him to generally overbid, and while that can be okay on some hands, this one doesn't look like a good example.
BTW, I really admire the choice of double followed by 1N. I am just not sure that I can trust someone to make an insufficent bid, or that I can accept it in time.
#17 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-October-19, 12:17
mikeh, on Oct 19 2005, 01:12 PM, said:
What do you mean? It's going to go 1S p p X XX p p 1N
#18
Posted 2005-October-19, 12:26
- hrothgar
#19
Posted 2005-October-19, 13:54
Poky, on Oct 19 2005, 10:36 AM, said:
♠K652
♥Q
♦KQ72
♣AKJ6
(1♠) pass (pass) ???
1nt, HQ should be devalued and SKxxx sucks, you are in the right range if you play 1nt to show 12-16. If you hold SKT9x, it becomes tough.
#20
Posted 2005-October-19, 23:47

Help
