Always a bidding problem Can you explain your bid?
#21
Posted 2005-October-08, 17:53
#22
Posted 2005-October-08, 19:33
#23
Posted 2005-October-08, 21:03
Free, on Oct 8 2005, 03:10 PM, said:
You have no problem.... yet
- hrothgar
#24
Posted 2005-October-09, 02:51
Hannie, on Oct 9 2005, 04:03 AM, said:
Free, on Oct 8 2005, 03:10 PM, said:
You have no problem.... yet
Lol, I'd like to see the full hand, so I can give you the next sequence of bids.
#25
Posted 2005-October-09, 20:16
#26
Posted 2005-October-10, 03:06
If we bid dbl with this hand....in all other hand when we must bid it...we will be in big difficoult.
Omero
1) Dell'universo che e' infinito
2) Della stupidita' umana
Della prima non ne sono nemmeno tanto sicuro....
#27
Posted 2005-October-10, 04:02
Fluffy, on Oct 9 2005, 03:33 AM, said:
A lot of people in Belgium (and in France I think) also play 2♦ as Michaels and 2♣ as natural.
Alain
#28
Posted 2005-October-10, 05:10
You lose a natural 2♦ jump overcall and trade it for a 2♣ overcall over a ♣ suit that is more often than not RHO's longest suit, even though it COULD be preparartory.
#29
Posted 2005-October-10, 05:42
joker_gib, on Oct 10 2005, 10:02 AM, said:
Fluffy, on Oct 9 2005, 03:33 AM, said:
A lot of people in Belgium (and in France I think) also play 2♦ as Michaels and 2♣ as natural.
Alain
Playing (1♣)-2♦ as michaels you lose the diamond WJO, one of the most fearsome weapons in today's modern bidding arsenal.
#30
Posted 2005-October-10, 06:38
Don't use 1♣ 2♦ as a 2-suiter if 1♣ is natural.
If 1♣ is NOT natural, use something brown-stickerish instead because this is now allowed

Help
