Help
1♦ was 11-16 unbalanced with 4+ diamonds
Agree with 4♥? What do you do now?
Page 1 of 1
Hot or not? Void in partner's suit
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,942
- Joined: 2005-January-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Cologne, Germany
- Interests:Sleeping, Eating
Posted 2012-March-25, 12:05
1♦ was 11-16 unbalanced with 4+ diamonds
Agree with 4♥? What do you do now?
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 16,739
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-March-25, 14:13
agree.
5h now.
will bid 6d over 5s\
will bid 7s over 6d
wish pard could have had a hand type that could bid rkc over 4h.
5h now.
will bid 6d over 5s\
will bid 7s over 6d
wish pard could have had a hand type that could bid rkc over 4h.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,029
- Joined: 2009-February-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:St. George, UT
Posted 2012-March-25, 15:00
Certainly temping to get the torture over with and bid 7♠ right now. But in a forum, let's give CHO some more headaches with 5H. Too afraid of 5D being misconstrued.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 636
- Joined: 2011-December-01
- Gender:Not Telling
- Location:UK
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
Statistics, but not massaged by the media.
Posted 2012-March-25, 18:26
I don't like showing shortness controls in partner's suit, but maybe this is the time to do it. 4♦ last round may have suggested playing in ♦, but 5♦ now must be a control cue.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem – Albert Einstein
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,465
- Joined: 2006-January-07
- Location:Montreal Canada
- Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.
Posted 2012-March-26, 02:26
In my book when you have a sure fit in the M you always make the cheapest cuebid available. So by bidding 4H we denied a club control and a diamond filler (if that is your agreements, AKQ of D), we are also showing great trumps since we did make a slam try vs a limited hand. So 5D at this pts should show a void (unless you have some really advanced agreemants for some sort of LTTC asking for a H cards.)
Note that here its likely partner has a H void (why did he bid 5C rather than RKC ? when we have controls in all the suits (except maybe diamonds) ?
Note that here its likely partner has a H void (why did he bid 5C rather than RKC ? when we have controls in all the suits (except maybe diamonds) ?
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,373
- Joined: 2003-March-15
- Location:Hamburg, Germany
- Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball
Posted 2012-March-26, 05:19
I would bid 5 ♦ to show my shortness and it is not close. Must this be a void? I hope so, but I am not convinced yet.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,942
- Joined: 2005-January-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Cologne, Germany
- Interests:Sleeping, Eating
Posted 2012-March-26, 05:24
OK, as most people suggested, I bid 5♦. Partner responded 5♠. Now what?
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,373
- Joined: 2003-March-15
- Location:Hamburg, Germany
- Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball
Posted 2012-March-26, 05:45
I go for 6 spades.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#9
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2012-March-26, 12:17
I bid 6♠ over 5♣
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,925
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2012-March-26, 12:43
mgoetze, on 2012-March-26, 05:24, said:
OK, as most people suggested, I bid 5♦. Partner responded 5♠. Now what?
6♦ to confirm that this is a void, I'm known to have no club control, so really have to be this good in the majors. My one worry is that partner has xxxx, QJ, something, AKQ and we're in a grand on a finesse, but partner hasn't used blackwood, so is probably shapelier than that.
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,942
- Joined: 2005-January-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Cologne, Germany
- Interests:Sleeping, Eating
Posted 2012-March-26, 22:18
Well, apparently I'm not the only one missing this grand, that's good I guess.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 16,739
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-March-26, 22:34
mgoetze, on 2012-March-26, 22:18, said:
Well, apparently I'm not the only one missing this grand, that's good I guess.
lol
I said 5h not 5d
over 6d I bid 7s
no ..dont bid 5d
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,465
- Joined: 2006-January-07
- Location:Montreal Canada
- Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.
Posted 2012-March-27, 00:29
Assuming that we are sure that 5D is showing a void, i dont think i like 5S, sure the AQ of D look like ugly waste but the club void is huge and QJT of H is worth a lot. Partner made a slam try vs 11-16 with a void in D and nothing in clubs.
Axxxxx
Kxx
--
xxxx
AJxxx
Axxx
--
xxxx
QJxxxx
Axxx
---
xxx
these hands make decent slam and i dont think he can have less than this for his 4H slam try. Also note that if your style is to RKC when you can rather than make a 5 level cuebid, the 5 level cuebid always implies a void (or is specifically asking for a control not possible here) so that 5S denies a H control and implies the club void, if so south has to make a try for 7 wich north will easily accept.
Tough and interesting hand. Also note that in a limited opening style i would bid 4C (showing a void) not 3S my hand make a decent game vs Axxxx and nothing else.
Axxxxx
Kxx
--
xxxx
AJxxx
Axxx
--
xxxx
QJxxxx
Axxx
---
xxx
these hands make decent slam and i dont think he can have less than this for his 4H slam try. Also note that if your style is to RKC when you can rather than make a 5 level cuebid, the 5 level cuebid always implies a void (or is specifically asking for a control not possible here) so that 5S denies a H control and implies the club void, if so south has to make a try for 7 wich north will easily accept.
Tough and interesting hand. Also note that in a limited opening style i would bid 4C (showing a void) not 3S my hand make a decent game vs Axxxx and nothing else.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#14
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 16,739
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-March-27, 00:45
I rst my case too compliclated......i give up
Page 1 of 1