Page 1 of 1
Redoubles of Artificials over NT
#1
Posted 2007-October-15, 21:35
I'm curious what the normal expectancy is for a redouble of a Stayman or Jacoby Transfer. Any thoughts here? Any changes if 3-level?
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2007-October-15, 23:32
I'm surprised the other posters play this as natural, especially Jacoby. I thought this was near-universaly played as a tool to get the contract in partner's hand. As for Stayman, some would play it as natural, though.
Maybe I should stop reading Dutch magazines, they obviously have an obcesion with wicked conventions that nobody play on BBO
Maybe I should stop reading Dutch magazines, they obviously have an obcesion with wicked conventions that nobody play on BBO
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#5
Posted 2007-October-16, 00:00
HHxx ++
Doesn't say anything about a 4 card major (in a Stayman auction) or 3 pieces (in a transfer auction), although this may not be a universal sentiment.
I don't know what it shows over a 3 level call. The meanings of 1N - 3x vary greatly, so I'm hesitant to label the redouble as something specific.
Doesn't say anything about a 4 card major (in a Stayman auction) or 3 pieces (in a transfer auction), although this may not be a universal sentiment.
I don't know what it shows over a 3 level call. The meanings of 1N - 3x vary greatly, so I'm hesitant to label the redouble as something specific.
"Phil" on BBO
#6
Posted 2007-October-16, 00:01
pclayton, on Oct 16 2007, 08:00 AM, said:
I don't know what it shows over a 3 level call. The meanings of 1N - 3x vary greatly, so I'm hesitant to label the redouble as something specific.
I think the "3-level" refered to Stayman/Jacoby after a 2N opening.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#7
Posted 2007-October-16, 02:55
After transfers at 2 level I play the following:
pass = 2 card M
RDbl = 3 card M fit, trying to rightside the contract (usually A, nothing or Kxx(+))
2M = 3 card M fit, trying to rightside the contract
pass = 2 card M
RDbl = 3 card M fit, trying to rightside the contract (usually A, nothing or Kxx(+))
2M = 3 card M fit, trying to rightside the contract
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#9
Posted 2007-October-16, 10:08
helene_t, on Oct 16 2007, 12:32 AM, said:
Maybe I should stop reading Dutch magazines, they obviously have an obcesion with wicked conventions that nobody play on BBO
There's no money in writing the same things over and over again.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#10
Posted 2007-October-16, 12:46
XX of Stayman show a strong 4-card suit or 5.
XX of Jacoby show 3+ in suit transfered to and a holding in RHO's suit that suggest it's better for partner to declare, that is xx/xxx/Ax/Axx. Pass showing a doubleton in parther's suit.
XX of Jacoby show 3+ in suit transfered to and a holding in RHO's suit that suggest it's better for partner to declare, that is xx/xxx/Ax/Axx. Pass showing a doubleton in parther's suit.
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
Page 1 of 1