vg|Danmark - Slutspil 2022 - Finale,1 af 4,I,1,16,Schou,12,Norris,0| rs|3DS-1,3DS-1,6NS-1,3NN+2,2SWx-2,2CN+1,4SSx-1,4SN+1,4SW=,4SW=,3NW=,3NE-1,1NE=,1NE-1,4HW=,4HW+1,4SNx-1,5HWx-1,2SWx-3,3NN+1,4HW=,3NE=,5CS=,3NN+1,4HE+1,4HE+1,3NW=,3NW+1,4HW+1,4HW+1,4HN-1,4HN=| pn|M.Larsen,Marquardse,S.A.Jensen,Norris,Buus Th.,Hansen,Hemberg,Schou|pg|| qx|o1|st||md|3SA8H742DAJ9832CT8,S53HAT853DKT7CKQJ,SK742HQ6DQ6CA6432,SQJT96HKJ9D54C975|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|c8|pg|| pc|h6|pc|hJ|pc|h7|pc|h5|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|d6|pg|| nt|Thorvald: It looked right to duck the opening lead|pg|| pc|d7|pc|dQ|pc|d4|pc|dA|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: Good morning Thorvald :)|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|dT|pc|c2|nt|Thorvald: Then with @Cs 3-3 there was a chance to make|pg|| pc|sQ|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Good morning|pg|| pc|cT|pc|cJ|pc|c3|pc|c5|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|h2|pg|| pc|h9|pc|h4|pc|hT|pc|s2|pg|| nt|Thorvald: There was a 12 Impo carry-over|pg|| mc|8|pg|| qx|c1|st||md|3SA8H742DAJ9832CT8,S53HAT853DKT7CKQJ,SK742HQ6DQ6CA6432,SQJT96HKJ9D54C975|sv|o|mb|1C!|mb|1S|mb|2D|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|c8|pg|| pc|h6|pc|hJ|pc|h7|pc|h8|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|d6|pg|| pc|d7|pc|dQ|pc|d4|pc|d3|pg|| pc|s2|pc|sQ|pc|sA|pc|s3|pg|| pc|dA|pc|dT|pc|s4|pc|s6|pg|| mc|8|pg|| qx|o2|st||md|4SKQT93HA74DK65CK6,SJ74H3DJ982CJ8754,S82HKJTDAQ3CAQT92,SA65HQ98652DT74C3|sv|n|mb|2C!|nt|vugraphzbj: 2@c = 0-7hcp any distribution|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: its not mandatory to open 2@c with 0-7 non vul against vul|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and West explains when they dont open 2@c: 4333 hands, hands with 3 controls (A and a K) and hands with the hcp in the short suits|pg|| mb|2N|mb|p|mb|6N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c5|nt|Thorvald: 6N requires the right view in @S|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: will the 2@c opening help declarer Thorvald? or will it "harm" him?|pg|| pc|c9|pc|c3|pc|c6|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Might be best plan to let the @S8 run - not working here|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Here I think he should ignore the opening|pg|| pc|c2|pc|h2|pc|cK|pc|c4|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: EW playing "Italian discards"|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: uneven is encouraging|pg|| nt|Thorvald: After the @H discard, he should assume that @H is East running suit|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and ewq|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and equal should be a kind of Lavinthal signal|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: uneven = odd :)|pg|| nt|Pelu: God morgen|pg|| nt|Thorvald: It might be right to play @S to king and then to Queen and if both holds then to solve @Hs|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: God morgen Peter - velkommen til|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|d4|pg|| pc|s8|pc|s5|nt|Thorvald: Right click on a player and select kibitz if you want to see only what the player sees|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sJ|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|c2|st||md|4SKQT93HA74DK65CK6,SJ74H3DJ982CJ8754,S82HKJTDAQ3CAQT92,SA65HQ98652DT74C3|sv|n|mb|2D|an|Multi|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h5|pc|h4|pc|h3|pc|hJ|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s5|pc|sK|pc|s4|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c4|pc|c2|pc|c3|pg|| pc|c6|pc|c5|pc|cQ|pc|h2|pg|| pc|s8|pc|s6|pc|s3|pc|sJ|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|o3|st||md|1SKJ86H9762D642C96,S742HAQDKJ973CK87,STHKJT3DAQTCAJT53,SAQ953H854D85CQ42|sv|e|nt|Thorvald: Seems to be the right plan, but 13 Imps away|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: og så forsvandt de 12 overførte som dug fra himlen|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: eller solen over Aarhus :)|pg|| nt|Pelu: der er sol pÃ¥ Frederiksberg|pg|| mb|p|nt|vugraphzbj: der er altid "Sol over Aarhus" i følge Gnags :)|pg|| mb|1N|nt|Pelu: og min morgenkaffe pÃ¥ vej - morgenmad med avis pÃ¥ terrassen kl. 7.00-8.00|pg|| mb|d|mb|2H!|nt|Thorvald: 1N=12-14|pg|| nt|Pelu: det er over Gudhjem ;)|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: jeg tænker ikke på mad Peter :) :)|pg|| mb|p|mb|2S|mb|d|mb|p|nt|Thorvald: Now a T/O D from North|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: what to bid with the south hand now|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: pass?|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Would you sit it?|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|Thorvald: I think so, and it calls for a trump lead by North|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: what do you think about bidding transfers when you are running from a weak-nt dbl?|pg|| nt|Pelu: det sidder meget dÃ¥rligt for ØV - @dED ude af plads, 3 spar-tabere, @hK bagpÃ¥, og muligvis 2 @c-tabere - jeg er nede pÃ¥ 5 stik til ØV|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: is that better than running in your own suit immediately ..or?|pg|| pc|sT|nt|Thorvald: North will be endplayed somewhere so 2 down, and declarer might escape with down 1|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and my BOLS-tips for you :) ... always lead a trumph against a doubled partscore contract :)|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s6|nt|Thorvald: Transfer is OK for me, but I prefer to play Nilslands Slinkningar|pg|| pc|s2|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d6|nt|Pelu: the pÃ¥roblem is that you - with transfer cant run in minor 5 card suit - as I see transfer dont work after at penalty D|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: I am told NS are also playing transfers from 1nt DBL - so it might be better when these players plays like this|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c6|pc|c7|pg|| pc|c5|nt|Thorvald: Now North is endplayed. @D is declares suit, and partner did not bid @H, so a @C is natural|pg|| nt|Pelu: ok now N is endplayed - he is too strong;)|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|c9|pc|c8|pg|| pc|d8|pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|c4|pc|s8|pc|cK|pg|| pc|h7|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|h4|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|h5|pc|h2|pc|hA|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dT|pc|s3|pc|d4|pg|| pc|h8|pc|h9|pc|s4|pc|h3|pg|| mc|6|pg|| qx|c3|st||md|1SKJ86H9762D642C96,S742HAQDKJ973CK87,STHKJT3DAQTCAJT53,SAQ953H854D85CQ42|sv|e|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|d8|pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c6|pc|c7|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c4|pc|c9|pc|cK|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h3|pc|h8|pc|h2|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|h4|pc|h6|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pc|d4|pc|c8|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|s7|pc|sT|pg|| pc|h5|pc|h7|pc|d3|pc|hJ|pg|| pc|cT|pc|s5|pc|h9|pc|s4|pg|| pc|c5|pc|s3|pc|s8|pc|s2|pg|| pc|hT|pc|d5|pc|d6|pc|d7|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|s9|pc|sJ|pc|dJ|pg|| pc|dT|pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|d9|pg|| pg|| qx|o4|st||md|2SKJT975HA853D7CQ3,S832HQT9642D84C64,SA6HK7DKJT2CKT975,SQ4HJDAQ9653CAJ82|sv|b|mb|p|nt|Pelu: in CR 2@C bid from N saved EW for problems|pg|| nt|duschek: Good morning :)|pg|| mb|1N|an|13-15|nt|Thorvald: Convention card for NS: https://www2.bridge.dk/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fDivisionsturneringer%2f2021-22%2f1.+division%2f7_mikkel_og_sejr.pdf|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 1nt = 15-17|pg|| nt|Pelu: if N pas then 1@S from East and 1NT or 2@s from West - and the D!|pg|| nt|Thorvald: CC for EW: https://www2.bridge.dk/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fDivisionsturneringer+2021-2022%2f1.+division%2f4_1+div+2021+AJ.pdf|pg|| nt|duschek: I have been admitted to the table as I am a former partner of both East and South at this table :)|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and because you are a well educated Tournament Director too :)|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: welcome Jacob :)|pg|| mb|p|mb|2C!|mb|2H|nt|vugraphzbj: eller det troede jeg :)|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: SORRY - 1nt = 13-15|pg|| nt|Thorvald: That 2@H is not in my book anywhere, except for the missclick by operator|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphzbj: south asking about the 2@h bid - knowing that EW are playing Multi 2@d-opening|pg|| nt|duschek: West is younger than us|pg|| mb|3H!|mb|p|nt|Thorvald: But I assume NS haven't a penalty double availabal|pg|| nt|Thorvald: 3@H=Transfer|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|nt|Thorvald: 4@H = transfer again|pg|| mb|4S|mb|p|nt|Pelu: max 500 on 2@hD - so ....|pg|| nt|Thorvald: As Mats Nilsland wrote to me. The weaker you are the stronger partner is behind the opener.|pg|| nt|Thorvald: And 2@H might get declarer to misplace some of the high cards|pg|| mb|p|nt|Pelu: oh I see possible 800|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|nilsland: God morning all nice people :)|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: Good morning Mats Nilsland|pg|| nt|Pelu: sam,e to Yoy Mats|pg|| nt|duschek: I think North would double to show spades, but that means that West could easily be caught by a takeout double being converted to penalties|pg|| nt|Pelu: Norris also expected at better hans from his partner|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: People are saying that Nilslands slinkningar is a good convention - I hope we will have one or more of those situations later in this session :)|pg|| pc|d8|nt|nilsland: I really miss playing in the division tournament!|pg|| nt|Thorvald: But East could not know, so the 2@H might cost 5 or 8 Imp|pg|| pc|dT|pc|dQ|pc|d7|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|h3|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pg|| nt|nilsland: West had already bid East hand :)|pg|| nt|duschek: East should expect South to have his bid in this kind of auction. But still his hand looks like 2-3 defensive tricks.|pg|| pc|c5|nt|Thorvald: But what should declarers plan be now?|pg|| pc|c2|pc|cQ|pc|c4|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c6|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pg|| nt|duschek: I am afraid there will be no Nilslands Slinkningar in this session if both pairs play transfers after 1NT-(X)|pg|| pc|dA|pc|s5|pc|d4|pc|d2|pg|| nt|Thorvald: So what now?|pg|| nt|nilsland: Good Jacobm no swings will be my fault :)|pg|| nt|duschek: Draw trumps, endplay West in hearts? Not easy.|pg|| nt|duschek: Larsen taught me transfers after 1NT-(X), then I taught Norris that. And I think Larsen was taught it by Askgaard and Konow. I wonder who started this thing?|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: but south must have a good sense of the distribution after the @d lead (indicating double) the 2@h bid (must be 6-card suit) - or?|pg|| nt|nilsland: It is ok to use transfer when double is artificial though|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: so an endplay in @hs might not be that far away|pg|| nt|Thorvald: After an artifical double it is fine with system on|pg|| nt|duschek: The idea is 1NT-(X)-XX=clubs, 1NT-(X)-2@C=diamonds. If responder passes, opener redoubles with a 4-4, and hopefully we find a fit.|pg|| nt|Thorvald: But there is still the problem with @SQ|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: yes Thorvald -- and the question might also be "Why didnt west open a 2@d multi"?|pg|| nt|nilsland: Decl doesnt know spade length and may try SK and small to the A, but that works too|pg|| nt|duschek: And if East has three trumps, playing the @SK then @SA works better|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: some might reject to open 2@d with Qxx in the other major?|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Playing a small @H in this situation might also be an idea|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: @sK is in declares hand - but he is convincing himself to play it|pg|| nt|Thorvald: After @SK and A - dropping the Q declarer will know the entire hand, and must ruff to hand, draw the last trump and the play a @H|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s2|pc|s6|pc|s4|pg|| pc|s7|pc|s3|pc|sA|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|dK|nt|Thorvald: Entertaining deal |pg|| pc|d3|pc|h5|nt|Thorvald: No|pg|| pc|s8|pg|| pc|hT|pc|h7|pc|d5|pc|hA|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c4|st||md|2SKJT975HA853D7CQ3,S832HQT9642D84C64,SA6HK7DKJT2CKT975,SQ4HJDAQ9653CAJ82|sv|b|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2C!|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|d|mb|3H!|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|nt|Vugraphzbn: @d B blev afblokeret |pg|| mb|4H!|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dA|pc|d7|pc|d8|pc|d2|pg|| pc|d3|pc|h3|pc|d4|pc|dT|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s4|pc|s5|pc|s3|pg|| pc|s6|pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|s2|pg|| nt|jr7: God morgen|pg|| mc|11|nt|Vugraphzbn: God morgen Jørgen :)|pg|| pg|| qx|o5|st||md|3SQHQT9DJ864CAKQJ3,SAJ842HA4DKQ7CT92,S53H832DAT932C876,SKT976HKJ765D5C54|sv|n|nt|duschek: That went too fast - South did not realize that he had the extra chance that Thorvald pointed out|pg|| nt|Thorvald: He made a plan but forgot to replan, when the @SQ dropped|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|Thorvald: The plan was OK, catering for East having Qxx|pg|| nt|duschek: East might have falsecarded the S!Q from S!Qxx, but only the Rueful Rabbit would find such a play|pg|| nt|duschek: S!Q = @SQ|pg|| mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2C!|an|majors|nt|vugraphzbj: 2@c = majors|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Yes, Jacob, that would have been develish|pg|| nt|duschek: South's system bid is 1@D, but it is easy to see the drawbacks of that|pg|| nt|nilsland: Even that would not help if S ruffed a club|pg|| mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|duschek: With a 4-card diamond suit, they can only open 2@C if holding a six-card club suit AND a maximum (=13-15)|pg|| nt|Pelu: wd EW|pg|| pc|c7|pc|c4|nt|vugraphzbj: and here we have an East hand TOO STRONG for a 2@c = 0-7 hcp opening white against red|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c9|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c6|pc|c5|pg|| pc|d6|pc|dK|pc|dA|pc|d5|pg|| pc|dT|pc|h5|pc|d4|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s3|pc|sK|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|s6|mc|10|pg|| qx|c5|st||md|3SQHQT9DJ864CAKQJ3,SAJ842HA4DKQ7CT92,S53H832DAT932C876,SKT976HKJ765D5C54|sv|n|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|jr7: ligner en solid 4@s|pg|| mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c6|pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|c2|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|c7|pc|c5|pg|| pc|d4|pc|dK|pc|dA|pc|d5|pg|| pc|d3|pc|h5|pc|d8|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s6|pc|sQ|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|o6|st||md|4ST973HA9DK7642CT2,SJ85HKJ764D5CAKJ7,SAQ64HQT83D983C54,SK2H52DAQJTCQ9863|sv|e|mb|1S!|an|a normal 1!d opening|nt|vugraphzbj: 1@S = a normal 1@d opening|pg|| mb|p|mb|1N!|mb|p|mb|2C|an| |nt|vugraphzbj: 2@c = possible canapé|pg|| mb|p|mb|2H!|mb|p|nt|vugraphzbj: and 10-15 Gameforcing|pg|| mb|2S!|mb|p|mb|2N!|mb|p|mb|3H!|mb|p|nt|vugraphzbj: West is bidding a lot of relays|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 2@s = minimum hand |pg|| nt|duschek: I must admit that I don't know E-W's system, but from the convention card I can add that 1@S-2@H would be natural with a weak hand|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 3@h = 2-2-4-5 distribution|pg|| nt|Pelu: need a @s-lead to defet 3NT|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphzbj: 1nt = relay|pg|| nt|Pelu: not so easy from N|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 2@h = relay|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 2nt = relay|pg|| nt|Thorvald: On a @H-lead a switch to @S will still be OK|pg|| nt|Pelu: many would lead a @d|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 1nt = gameforcing with any hand|pg|| nt|duschek: A heart lead looks normal if all we know is that East is 2245 and West wants to play 3NT opposite that|pg|| pc|s4|nt|nilsland: 4th best in your best suit still works|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s9|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|d4|pg|| nt|Thorvald: At the CC: !@S-1N=0+ , should probably be updated to GF if that is the agreement|pg|| pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h4|nt|Pelu: but sometimes u dont lead from A - entry for your suit|pg|| pc|h3|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s5|pc|sA|pc|sK|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: according to what I heard west explain to south 1nt was GF|pg|| nt|Thorvald: I would have lead a @h|pg|| nt|nilsland: Yes Peter, with Axxx and Q10xx a heart would more often be right|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|dJ|pc|s7|pc|s8|pg|| pc|s6|pc|dQ|pc|sT|mc|9|pg|| qx|c6|st||md|4ST973HA9DK7642CT2,SJ85HKJ764D5CAKJ7,SAQ64HQT83D983C54,SK2H52DAQJTCQ9863|sv|e|mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: @s angreb sætter 3ut - @d ud er ikke godt for modspillet|pg|| pc|sT|nt|jr7: god start for Norris|pg|| pc|s5|pc|s4|pc|sK|pg|| pc|c6|pc|c2|pc|cA|pc|c5|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d8|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s8|pc|sQ|pc|s2|pg|| pc|sA|pc|h2|pc|s9|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|s6|pc|h5|pc|s7|pc|h4|pg|| pc|hA|mc|8|pg|| qx|o7|st||md|1S64HJ65DAQJ7CK974,S875HA932D865CA82,SKJT2HQT87DT3CJT5,SAQ93HK4DK942CQ63|sv|b|nt|vugraphzbj: but it might be me and my lack of hearing aid that made a mistake Thorvald :)|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1N|nt|duschek: South's diamond duck seemed like a reflex play. Often a good idea to mess up declarer's entries, but here it cost a vital tempo for the defence.|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Smiths peeter would have worked here, as south then could have known not to duck the @D|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|duschek: I think they do play Smith Peters|pg|| pc|s4|nt|nilsland: From S you dont know if p has 1, 2 or 3 diamonds|pg|| pc|s5|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg|| nt|Thorvald: No, but a a Smiths Peter would give 3 tricks in @S so he just need to count to 5|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: board 6 was indeed an interesting defence problem I think :)|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d7|pc|d8|pc|dT|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s3|pc|s6|pc|s7|pg|| nt|duschek: The problem is that both must decide immediately what to play. A hesitation gives partner UI and valuable information to declarer too.|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d3|pc|d4|pc|dJ|pg|| nt|duschek: I have a tempo issue as well, still playing board 6 while everybody else is at 7|pg|| nt|Pelu: noe duch a @h and endplay S|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Yes, but eccoing in north should be automatic, playing Smiths Peter you need to plan ahead|pg|| pc|c4|pc|c2|pc|cT|pc|cQ|pg|| nt|Pelu: ok S was helpfull|pg|| nt|Pelu: defensive play are very difficult - |pg|| pc|sQ|pc|h5|pc|s8|pc|sT|pg|| pc|hK|pc|h6|pc|h2|pc|h7|pg|| pc|h4|pc|hJ|pc|h3|nt|Pelu: many players use 90% on bidding and only 10% on defensive signals - that is a great mistake|pg|| pc|h8|pg|| pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c3|pg|| pc|hA|pc|hT|pc|s9|pc|c7|pg|| pc|c8|pc|cJ|pc|c6|pc|c9|pg|| mc|7|pg|| qx|c7|st||md|1S64HJ65DAQJ7CK974,S875HA932D865CA82,SKJT2HQT87DT3CJT5,SAQ93HK4DK942CQ63|sv|b|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s6|nt|jr7: hvis modspillet holder fast, bliver der næppe mere end 6 stik til Schou|pg|| nt|jr7: og dog, nu fÃ¥r spilfører mulighed for at etablere det 3. @s stik|pg|| nt|jr7: til 7 stik|pg|| pc|s8|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d7|nt|jr7: @h ud i det blinde havde gjort underværker til modspillet - ikke nemt at se|pg|| pc|d8|pc|dT|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|s5|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d3|nt|jr7: fint lille stik|pg|| pc|d4|pc|dQ|pg|| nt|jr7: uden @s ud, ville det teknisk være rigtigt at spille @s til @s9 første gang, hvilket ogsÃ¥ ville følge til 7 stik til spilfører|pg|| pc|h5|pc|h2|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dJ|pc|d6|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|dA|pc|c2|pc|cT|pc|dK|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|h3|pc|h7|pc|h4|pg|| pc|h6|pc|hA|pc|h8|pc|s9|pg|| pc|s7|pc|sT|pc|sQ|pc|c4|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c5|pg|| pc|c8|mc|6|pg|| qx|o8|st||md|2ST82H76DK754CKJT6,S6HAKQJ5DAQ6CQ874,SAQ954HT82D982C53,SKJ73H943DJT3CA92|sv|o|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|nt|Pelu: ok this sh be a standard 4@h|pg|| mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|Pelu: but 3NT also make|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c2|pc|cK|pc|c4|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|c7|pc|c5|pc|cA|pg|| nt|nilsland: not so easy to play but everything works|pg|| nt|Pelu: @DJ look good|pg|| nt|Pelu: but 3X@h and @s = N must help|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h6|pc|hK|pc|h2|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h8|pc|h4|pc|h7|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|hT|pc|c9|pc|c6|pg|| nt|nilsland: declarer hoped for doubleton in @C and @H as an extra chance|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s3|nt|duschek: North got a cheap trump trick, but West gets it back in the form of a club ruff. If North were 2-2 in @H+@C, his plan would win the contract immediately, and he still has the diamond finesse in reserve|pg|| pc|sT|pc|s6|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dJ|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg|| nt|Pelu: extra chance to go down ;)|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|c8|st||md|2ST82H76DK754CKJT6,S6HAKQJ5DAQ6CQ874,SAQ954HT82D982C53,SKJ73H943DJT3CA92|sv|o|mb|1H|mb|1S|mb|2H|mb|2S|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c5|pc|c2|pc|cK|pc|c7|pg|| pc|d4|pc|dQ|pc|d9|pc|d3|pg|| nt|jr7: sorry - var uopmærksom - det lykkedes spilfører at gÃ¥ ned - satsede pÃ¥ @d Es faldt ud|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|h6|pg|| pc|hK|pc|h8|pc|h4|pc|h7|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|hT|pc|h9|pc|sT|pg|| pc|s6|pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s8|pg|| pc|d2|mc|11|pg|| qx|o9|st||md|3SKQJ82H86DT2CQ532,S9HKJT732DQ9854CJ,ST754H95DAJ6CAKT9,SA63HAQ4DK73C8764|sv|e|nt|nilsland: Alternative was D finess and go down with @DK in N and @SA in South|pg|| mb|1N|mb|p|nt|duschek: 1NT=12-15 not vulnerable|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 1nt 12-15 - now I have put my glasses on :)|pg|| mb|2H!|mb|3H|mb|3S|mb|4H|nt|Pelu: 4@s the perfect place for NS - only down 1 - and in CR Jørgen Hansen hoped for 5@h.- strange D by Hemberg - its not match point|pg|| mb|4S|nt|duschek: North must bid 3@S with four-card support. His hand is actually an excellent minimum.|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s3|nt|Pelu: very close Ds at both table - is that team bidding?|pg|| nt|Luffe12: Maybe the X was to prevent prd to bid 5@s, Peter?|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s9|pc|s4|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|h7|pc|s5|pc|sA|pg|| pc|hA|nt|duschek: If a contract happens to be down two, not doubling is quite expensive too. Doubling a game which makes is "only" 5 imps.|pg|| pc|h6|pc|h2|pc|h5|pg|| pc|h4|pc|h8|pc|hK|pc|h9|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d6|pc|dK|pc|d2|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pg|| pc|sT|pc|s6|pc|s2|nt|duschek: Whereas doubling a making game at matchpoints may be a disaster|pg|| pc|h3|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|d7|pc|c2|mc|9|pg|| qx|c9|st||md|3SKQJ82H86DT2CQ532,S9HKJT732DQ9854CJ,ST754H95DAJ6CAKT9,SA63HAQ4DK73C8764|sv|e|mb|1C!|mb|p|mb|1H!|an|!s|mb|2H|nt|jr7: 3@s imod 4 @h|pg|| nt|jr7: fint offer i 4 @s|pg|| mb|2S!|an|4-farve !s|mb|4H|mb|4S|mb|5H|nt|jr7: 1@h = 4+ @s i nord|pg|| nt|jr7: vrøvl|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|nt|jr7: i syd|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|cA|pc|c4|pc|c2|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c6|nt|jr7: ligner 1@c og 2 @d tabere|pg|| pc|c3|pc|h2|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d6|pc|dK|pc|d2|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|d4|pc|dJ|pg|| pc|s5|pc|sA|pc|sK|pc|s9|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|h3|pc|h5|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|h8|mc|10|pg|| qx|o10|st||md|4S3HKT974DJ5CK9754,SJ94HJ832DQ862C62,SAT652H5DAKT943CA,SKQ87HAQ6D7CQJT83|sv|b|nt|nilsland: Agree with Jacob, and a reasonable D w AK/A|pg|| nt|Pelu: ok|pg|| mb|1D!|an|4+!s|nt|vugraphzbj: 1@d = 4+@s - possible canapé in a minor suit|pg|| mb|1H|mb|p|nt|nilsland: I am more worried about Norris doubles, but they were both succesful :)|pg|| nt|duschek: One can imagine North asking "so did your 1@D bid show diamonds or spades?"|pg|| mb|2D|mb|p|nt|Pelu: 3NT was making, but 5@d looks as a safer contract|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 2@d alerted by south but not by north|pg|| mb|2H|mb|2S|mb|d|mb|p|nt|duschek: The play USP, and I don't see why that should not apply here too, but they probably didn't discuss it|pg|| nt|duschek: *They (=N-S)|pg|| nt|Luffe12: DD I think 5@d maay go down - @hA and trump shift, but very DD|pg|| nt|duschek: So in South's mind, North would bid 1@S as a transfer to clubs, 2@C as a transfer to diamonds, and 2@D with a good heart raise|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: is south a little scared now by his own 1@h bid? - and what do you play DBL as here? - if your agreements are USP, then you could make a trialbid - so DBL is?|pg|| nt|Pelu: NS has played together long time, so..|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: south thinking|pg|| nt|duschek: I think they play it for penalties when a suit has been bid and supported, which is what South believes North did|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|s2|nt|duschek: As it happens, North's support for hearts is exceptionally poor|pg|| nt|nilsland: A good lead|pg|| nt|nilsland: Peter will soon tell you this is 1100|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: a BOLS tips from me to all of you: Always lead a trumph against a doubled partscore contract|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Almost always lead a trump against doubled partscores, especially when you have the majority of honor points|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: Thats a tips for free :)|pg|| pc|s7|pc|s3|pc|s9|pg|| pc|c6|pc|cA|pc|c3|nt|nilsland: Thanks Jan!|pg|| pc|c5|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: You are welcome Mats :) :) |pg|| pc|h5|nt|vugraphzbj: I ones played a tournament with Giorgio Duboin - he didnt understand that tip :)|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h3|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|c2|pc|d3|pg|| nt|Thorvald: @S-continuation was actually better for NS|pg|| pc|dJ|nt|duschek: BOLS tip: Continue with another trump against a doubled part-score|pg|| nt|Pelu: @dJ also work|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d4|pc|d7|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d6|pc|d9|nt|nilsland: If West doesnt cover he can later ruff a club with @SJ and get out for 800|pg|| pc|s8|pg|| pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|sJ|pc|sA|pg|| pc|s5|pc|sQ|pc|h7|pc|s4|pg|| pc|cT|pc|c4|pc|h2|pc|s6|pg|| pc|dA|mc|5|nt|vugraphzbj: down 3 |pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and now West calls the Tournament director|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and says that the explanation of 2@d as a good @h raise |pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: that indicated that East must be short in @hs|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: making it more interesting to bid 2@s|pg|| nt|duschek: Sorry, I am at home, cannot go to the table to solve it|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: The TD is Thomas Mathiasen|pg|| nt|nilsland: I would not do that, playing an odd system you cant expect opps to know everything|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: what should be the verdict Jacob :)|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: I understand if you dont want to tell :)|pg|| nt|duschek: Well, as N-S play USP, it seems that North simply misbid, in which case the TD cannot help West|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: West saying that if I knew 2@d was natural I had @d Q862 and would never bid|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: TD is asking about the NS agreements|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: NS saying they havent a specific agreement against 1@D showing @ss|pg|| nt|duschek: But maybe South is expected to say "we play USP, but we never discussed this specific sequence"|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: but if 1@d was natural then 2@d would be a good @h raise|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: Thats almost what south told the TD Jacob|pg|| pg|| qx|c10|st||md|4S3HKT974DJ5CK9754,SJ94HJ832DQ862C62,SAT652H5DAKT943CA,SKQ87HAQ6D7CQJT83|sv|b|mb|1C!|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|2C!|an|!d|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|nt|jr7: kræver et skarpt modspil at sætte 5@d|pg|| nt|jr7: trække @hEs og skifte til @d - tror jeg|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cQ|nt|sommer: Tre spartabere og Hj E kan give ni med ruderknibning |pg|| nt|sommer: AltsÃ¥, hjerter i stik to, og afvente pingpong med ØV|pg|| nt|jr7: kan spilfører luske over pÃ¥ @hKonge ?? - ellers lÃ¥st pÃ¥ hÃ¥nden|pg|| nt|sommer: Skal bare spille hjerter i stik to, sÃ¥ kan opps tvinges til at give indkomst. Sjov pointe|pg|| nt|sommer: Kan selvfølgelig tage ruK med afblokering af B i stik to😁.. før hjerter|pg|| nt|sommer: Men det er dumt! SÃ¥ gÃ¥r han ned|pg|| nt|jr7: ingen grund til at tage @dKonge|pg|| nt|sommer: Meget svært men muligt|pg|| pc|c4|pc|c6|pc|cA|pg|| pc|h5|pc|h6|pc|hK|pc|h2|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c2|pc|s6|pc|c3|pg|| nt|jr7: @cKonge og knibe i @d = 9 stik|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pc|d7|pg|| nt|sommer: 10 ligefrem|pg|| nt|Luffe12: 10 vel Jørgen|pg|| mc|10|nt|jr7: længe tilfreds med at vinde :)|pg|| pg|| qx|o11|st||md|1SQ963HT32DK74CT95,SAKHAK8764D532C62,S852HJ5DAQT8CKQ83,SJT74HQ9DJ96CAJ74|sv|o|nt|Thorvald: When playing a complex system, I think you need to give some leeway to the opps as they might not have discussed that sequence|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: Now the TD has left the table - I will be back if I hear a verdict|pg|| mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|Pelu: 3NT a perfect contract - 9 tricks and @D not 5-2|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: until further notice the board is scored a 800 for NS|pg|| mb|2H!|mb|p|nt|duschek: A couple of years ago in a match between the same two teams, Norris and Larsen - both former partners of mine - were screenmates, and Norris called me because of an established revoke by Larsen. I had quite some fun about that :)|pg|| nt|Pelu: in CR after 1@H Hemberg in N D??? - min and not 4 card @s - not a partner for me ;)|pg|| mb|3H|mb|p|nt|Thorvald: That is fine for me :-)|pg|| nt|Pelu: do ypu like that D???|pg|| nt|nilsland: 4H goes down with a club lead|pg|| mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|nilsland: I would double too if p wasnt a passed hand|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and @c lead is "normal" for North - isnt it?|pg|| nt|Pelu: ok Thorwald - no rule that D a major promise the other or extra values??|pg|| nt|Thorvald: I would D, I think to much focus on @S if 4 is required|pg|| pc|cK|nt|Pelu: tx Thorvald that we dont agree ;););)|pg|| nt|Thorvald: I like the idea that a D is telling partner I can play in the 3 other suits and I have an opening hand|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: also on that North hand after pass from partner Thorvald?|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Ducking here will give North a problem|pg|| nt|duschek: I think you might raise your minimum by about 1 HCP if holding three spades only, but not more|pg|| pc|c4|pc|cT|pc|c2|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Bridge is a bidders game|pg|| nt|duschek: Of course, when partner is a passed hand, we will likely have to compete at the three-level|pg|| pc|s8|pc|s4|pc|s3|pc|sA|pg|| pc|h4|pc|h5|pc|hQ|pc|h2|pg|| pc|h9|pc|h3|pc|hA|pc|hJ|pg|| nt|Pelu: yes but correct bids - not bidding if u just love to open your mouth|pg|| pc|hK|pc|s5|pc|d6|pc|hT|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s2|pc|s7|pc|s6|pg|| nt|Thorvald: I agree with Hans Werge And Knut Blakset, that South should play @C5 at first trick as a Lavinthal for @Ds|pg|| pc|h8|pc|d8|pc|sT|pc|s9|pg|| pc|h7|pc|dT|pc|d9|pc|c5|pg|| pc|h6|pc|dA|pc|sJ|pc|d4|pg|| pc|c6|pc|c3|pc|cJ|pc|c9|pg|| pc|cA|pc|d7|pc|d2|pc|c8|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|c11|st||md|1SQ963HT32DK74CT95,SAKHAK8764D532C62,S852HJ5DAQT8CKQ83,SJT74HQ9DJ96CAJ74|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|d|mb|r|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: godt nok en tynd dobling i nord - 12 hp + xxx @s og en makkers forhÃ¥ndspas|pg|| pc|s6|nt|sommer: Det kan ofte være svært for modspillet “at gÃ¥ op” pÃ¥ de rigtige tidspunkter. Mikkel dykkede i spil 6 og forærede 3ut. Her ville ♥️E fra Schou give mere spænding|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s8|nt|jr7: 3ut en fin kontrakt - kun 9 stik i 4@h|pg|| pc|s4|pg|| pc|h4|pc|h5|pc|hQ|pc|h2|pg|| pc|h9|pc|h3|mc|9|pg|| qx|o12|st||md|2SAJT4HT54DCAQJT96,SQ9852HA3DK9754C7,S63HK6DAQT3CK8542,SK7HQJ9872DJ862C3|sv|n|nt|vugraphzbj: now North has left the table|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: he is looking for the TD|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: I am not sure what he wants to tell the TD|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: but a short break |pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: The TD is at the table|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Perhaps 42 sec to bid 2@H was Break in tempo|pg|| nt|nilsland: what was the explanation of 2H?|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: North just had some further explanations about the agreements - regarding the 2@s DBL board|pg|| nt|Pelu: I dont exp that the 4 players will sit together at lunch ;);)|pg|| mb|p|mb|1D!|nt|vugraphzbj: their is absolutely no bad wipes at the table|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: All players are focused - but also laughing together when someone makes a funny remarks|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: so no hard feelings|pg|| nt|Pelu: U misdefend and last chance: call TD ;);)|pg|| mb|2H|mb|d|nt|vugraphzbj: that was BY NO MEANS what North called the TD for Peter - it was just to give further info regarding the 2@s DBL board a while ago|pg|| mb|3H|mb|p|mb|p|nt|duschek: Again, North might have opened 1NT, but 1) that would show 13-15 vulnerable, 2) the diamonds are decent, 3) the spades are weak, so North opted for the natural 1@D opening|pg|| mb|5C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|h9|pc|h4|pg|| nt|nilsland: I prefer a natural 3@C instead of double with a good hand¨|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Is Double explained as High-Low?|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: no one asked about the meaning of the DBL|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hK|pc|h2|pc|h5|pg|| nt|nilsland: Over jump overcalls to 2M, you can consider playing transfers|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|c12|st||md|2SAJT4HT54DCAQJT96,SQ9852HA3DK9754C7,S63HK6DAQT3CK8542,SK7HQJ9872DJ862C3|sv|n|mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|3H|nt|sommer: 1♠️Anyone?|pg|| mb|d!|mb|p|nt|jr7: 3ut og 5@c vinder begge|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|nt|sommer: Jeg mÃ¥ Ã¥bne 1♠️ i mit system🥱|pg|| nt|sommer: Det bliver vist meget sværere at finde game for NS efter 1♠️I V|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|hQ|pc|h4|pc|hA|pc|h6|pg|| nt|sommer: MÃ¥ske er et ♦️Sving bedste chance set vestfra|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dT|pc|dJ|pc|h5|pg|| nt|jr7: 9 stik kommer aldrig i fare - mÃ¥ske modspillet vil give et overstik|pg|| nt|sommer: ♦️9 ser ikke opfordrende ud. 2./4.|pg|| pc|sK|nt|sommer: Dermed ved Schou, at N har dobbelthold|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s3|pg|| pc|sJ|mc|10|pg|| qx|o13|st||md|3SAKH754DJT872CJ65,S9653HQJ96DK4CKQT,SQT742H32DQ65C743,SJ8HAKT8DA93CA982|sv|b|nt|vugraphzbj: now the TD is at the table|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: The verdict is: The result stands|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: EW do not agree|pg|| nt|duschek: I think they play standard negative doubles over preemptive overcalls, not high-low doubles|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: The TD tells that his verdict is based on the assumption that North made a misbid|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and North have told the TD that (1@d) 1@h (pas) 1@s would be natural|pg|| mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|p|mb|1D!|mb|p|mb|1H!|mb|p|nt|duschek: If 1@S is natural, then 2@D must also be natural. It is going to be messy.|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: so 2@s dbl down 3 - and 800 for NS|pg|| mb|1S!|mb|p|mb|2C!|an|15-17nt hand with 4!hs 4!cs|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphzbj: 2@c = 4@c and 4@h |pg|| nt|duschek: Sounds like South should indeed have explained 2@D as "we normally play USP, but I am not sure if it applies here or if everything would be natural"|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: so East has shown: 15-17 nt hand with 4@cs 4@hs|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and West has just asked and relayed|pg|| pc|sK|nt|vugraphzbj: @sK followed by @sA = Partner be alert - I have AK only in @ss|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|s8|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|s4|pc|sJ|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and after 8@s gone now North might have figured that out too :) - but in other situations it might be valuable informations :)|pg|| pc|c6|mc|11|pg|| qx|c13|st||md|3SAKH754DJT872CJ65,S9653HQJ96DK4CKQT,SQT742H32DQ65C743,SJ8HAKT8DA93CA982|sv|b|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2C!|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|Luffe12: Kaffe-spil - 11 stik i en @h-kontrakt|pg|| pc|sK|nt|sommer: Dagens middelspil!|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|s8|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|s7|pc|sJ|pg|| nt|Vugraphzbn: Steen viser sine kort til Rico og claimer rest|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|o14|st||md|4SQT3HK6DA93CQ9743,SAKHA83DQJ72CAT52,S964HQ954DT654CJ6,SJ8752HJT72DK8CK8|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|p|mb|1H!|mb|p|mb|2C!|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|2H!|nt|vugraphzbj: 2@c = 18+ nt-hand|pg|| nt|duschek: Just in case anybody what "USP" is all about in board 10, the idea is that all bids from opener's suit and below a single raise are transfers. That is how South interpreted the auction.|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 2@d asking|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: 2@h = I have 2 or 3 @ss|pg|| mb|p|mb|2S!|mb|p|mb|2N!|mb|p|mb|3C!|mb|p|mb|3H!|nt|Thorvald: USP=Useful space principle : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_space_principle|pg|| mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|sommer: Interesting in EW system, they sometimes can change, who relays!|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and a lot of relays and answers I dont know the meaning of - ending in a totally normal 3nt :)|pg|| nt|duschek: There has been little action in the last couple of boards, so I am happy that I can dwell on details in the earlier boards|pg|| pc|h4|nt|vugraphzbj: TD have just told that they are way behind scheduled time|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|hK|pc|hA|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: both sides agreeing that they are all four responsible|pg|| nt|sommer: More difficult with a pointed lead, though|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: so they will split the penalty|pg|| pc|h8|pc|hQ|pc|h2|pc|h6|pg|| pc|d6|pc|d8|pc|d9|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h5|pc|h7|pc|c3|pg|| pc|hT|nt|vugraphzbj: I missed the unblock :)|pg|| pc|d3|pc|c2|pc|h9|pg|| pc|dK|pc|dA|pc|d2|pc|d4|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sA|pc|s9|pc|s2|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s6|pc|s5|pc|sT|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|d5|pc|s7|pc|c4|pg|| pc|c5|pc|c6|pc|cK|pc|c7|pg|| pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|cA|pc|cJ|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c14|st||md|4SQT3HK6DA93CQ9743,SAKHA83DQJ72CAT52,S964HQ954DT654CJ6,SJ8752HJT72DK8CK8|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|d|mb|p|mb|2C!|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: mon ikke flere havde valgt 1ut frem for doble i vest|pg|| nt|sommer: De er i 4♥️ i spil 11. Ricos dobling her ramte viste som en boomerang, sÃ¥|pg|| nt|Vugraphzbn: Rico spørger til 3UT og får at vide, at hans eget gæt er lige så godt som Steens :)|pg|| pc|h5|nt|sommer: Det her udspil skader ikke Hansens chancer|pg|| pc|hT|pc|hK|pc|hA|pg|| pc|h8|pc|hQ|pc|h2|pc|h6|pg|| pc|d5|pc|dK|pc|dA|pc|d2|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dQ|pc|d4|pc|d8|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h4|pc|h7|nt|jr7: at spille pÃ¥ @s giver hurtige 9 stik - nu er 9 stik lidt sværere|pg|| pc|c4|pg|| pc|hJ|nt|jr7: men en @h knibning er jo lige sÃ¥ effektivt|pg|| pc|c3|pc|d7|pc|h9|pg|| pc|cK|nt|sommer: Der skal to indkomster til til bordet!|pg|| pc|c7|pc|c2|pc|c6|pg|| pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|cT|pc|cJ|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|o15|st||md|1ST87H93DJT843CA65,S93HAKQJ82DAC8432,SQ62H64DQ975CKQJ7,SAKJ54HT75DK62CT9|sv|n|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|2D!|an|10-12hcp 3-4!hs|mb|p|mb|4H|nt|vugraphzbj: 2@d = 10-12hcp 3-4 @hs|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|Thorvald: 2@D=(9)10-12 3+@H|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Probably denying shortage|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: I love playing SMS (Støt Med Støtte) and not just bid 1@s - what do you thing?|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: think?|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c9|pc|c5|pc|c4|pg|| nt|Thorvald: Here 1@S could be OK, especially when 1@H is promising only 4|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|cT|pc|c6|pc|c3|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|c15|st||md|1ST87H93DJT843CA65,S93HAKQJ82DAC8432,SQ62H64DQ975CKQJ7,SAKJ54HT75DK62CT9|sv|n|nt|jr7: ja, kræve at man tager @sEK først|pg|| mb|p|mb|1H|nt|sommer: Ja, men hvad med ruder eller spar ud?|pg|| mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|3H!|an|0-2!s|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: med @h 2-2 vindes nemt 11 stik|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c9|pc|c5|pc|c4|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|cT|pc|cA|pc|c2|pg|| pc|dT|pc|dA|pc|d5|mc|11|nt|sommer: God ide at benægte 3♠️. Mange spiller 2ut som tvetydig med 6-3 i Ma|pg|| pg|| qx|o16|st||md|2SAK94HA432D4CAKQT,S6HQ87DKQ92C98764,ST83HK965D63CJ532,SQJ752HJTDAJT875C|sv|e|nt|duschek: If playing a strong club, I would just show support if I have a bid available for that. Less sure when 1@H is not limited.|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D!|nt|vugraphzbj: 1@d = 4+@s and possible canapé in a minor|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: and here it just looks like a natural 1@d opening :)|pg|| nt|duschek: Thorvald's point about the heart length promised by 1@H may be even more important|pg|| mb|d|nt|Thorvald: They have only switched 1@D and 1@S, not 1@C and 1@H|pg|| mb|p!|nt|duschek: And South's double looks like a normal double of a natural 1@D opening :)|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: John Norris told me that his reasoning for bidding 2@d instead of 1@s was: If partner has only 4@hs he has a unbalanced hand with a longer minor - making the chance of a @s-fit ...|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: less possible|pg|| nt|duschek: That is also true|pg|| mb|1H|mb|3D!|nt|vugraphzbj: 3@d showing a @d canapé|pg|| mb|4D|an| |mb|d|mb|4H|nt|sommer: V s pass might promise some ♦️ s|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|d5|pc|d4|pc|dQ|pc|d3|pg|| nt|sommer: Rare sacrifice i 5♦️ in uneven zone|pg|| pc|s6|pc|s8|pc|sQ|pc|sA|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h8|pc|hK|pc|hT|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|s9|pc|h7|pg|| pc|c9|pc|c3|pc|hJ|nt|sommer: Ooops|pg|| pc|cA|pg|| pc|sJ|pc|sK|pc|hQ|pc|sT|pg|| mc|9|nt|vugraphzbj: I played for @hs 4-1|pg|| nt|vugraphzbj: sorry partner|pg|| nt|duschek: N-S will be kicking themselves for boards 4 and 6. When do we restart?|pg|| nt|sommer: 11.30 in scedule|pg|| pg|| qx|c16|st||md|2SAK94HA432D4CAKQT,S6HQ87DKQ92C98764,ST83HK965D63CJ532,SQJ752HJTDAJT875C|sv|e|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|nt|sommer: 2-2?|pg|| nt|sommer: Optimal OD😜|pg|| mb|d|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|4D|mb|d|mb|p|nt|jr7: flere røde skilte|pg|| mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: ikke nemt at ofre alene i zonen, men gÃ¥r formentlig kun 1 gang i 5@d x|pg|| nt|jr7: mÃ¥ske 2 gange|pg|| nt|Vugraphzbn: Spillerne driller Jesper med, at han har meldt helt korrekt :)|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d4|pc|d2|pc|d6|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s4|pc|s6|pc|s8|pg|| pc|h5|pc|hT|pc|hA|pc|h7|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h8|pc|h9|pc|hJ|pg|| nt|sommer: Ingen 5 ud fra Ø?😳|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sA|pc|hQ|pc|sT|pg|| nt|sommer: ♦️5|pg|| mc|10|nt|jr7: med @d5 i udspil knibes i @h - med DB10 var man ikke interesseret i trumfning|pg|| pg||