vg|Practice match Open teams NET-FRA,7_8,I,1,12,Netherlands,334,France,403| rs|4HN-1,4HN-1,1NS-1,2CS-1,6DS-1,5DSx=,3HS=,2CW=,6HWx-1,7HWx-2,4SN+1,4SN+1,3CW-1,3CW-1,3SW+1,4SW-1,4HW-1,3NW-1,2SE=,2SE-1,3DW+2,3SE=,3SE=,4SWx-1| pn|Nab,Volcker,BobDrijver,Bessis,Combescure,Molenaar,Rombaut,Verbeek|pg|| qx|o1|st||md|3SKJ54HT53DACJ8762,SAQ98H97DKQ963CQT,ST76HAKQJ642D52C5,S32H8DJT874CAK943|sv|o|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: Dennis - who is at invisible table today?|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver joking before the lead: 'OK, just made' |pg|| pc|cK|pc|c2|pc|cT|pc|c5|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|sQ|pc|sT|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver took a little time before playing that spade, but Volcker doesn't really have an alternative|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|s2|nt|vugraphzdu: (before playing the spade in dummy)|pg|| pc|s5|pg|| pc|s9|pc|s7|pc|h8|pc|sJ|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c1|st||md|3SKJ54HT53DACJ8762,SAQ98H97DKQ963CQT,ST76HAKQJ642D52C5,S32H8DJT874CAK943|sv|o|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|cT|pc|c5|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|sQ|pc|sT|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|s2|pc|s5|pg|| pc|s8|pc|s7|pc|h8|pc|sJ|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|o2|st||md|4SAJT5HQ98DQ54CK53,SKQ97HA72DA82CT86,S32HKT63DT73CAQ97,S864HJ54DKJ96CJ42|sv|n|mb|p|mb|1C!|nt|ahollan1: 1@C = forcing, 2+@C|pg|| nt|ahollan1: still|pg|| mb|d|mb|1H|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: 1@h natural here; so no transfers|pg|| mb|1N!|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: 1NT explained as 12-14, maybe 4@s|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: but they open 1@d with 4@d-|pg|| nt|ahollan1: i wonder why they have not adopted transfers over the dbl|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s2|pc|s4|pc|sA|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Q lead asks for attitude against NT for EW|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: King lead would ask for count, but that's not what Volcker is interested about|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|hA|pc|h3|pc|h4|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: chanche for a surrounding play in diamonds if Bessis gets the lead|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: the defense can only pick up 4 diamond tricks if East begins with @d J|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: standard play at this level, but 1st problem is to get East on lead|pg|| pc|cT|pc|c7|pc|c2|pc|cK|pg|| pc|h9|nt|ahollan1: @CT might create a losing option in the suit |pg|| pc|h7|pc|h6|pc|hJ|pg|| pc|dJ|nt|vugraphzdu: Nab looking at that @dJ|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|dA|pc|d3|pg|| pc|d8|nt|ritong: hi everyone:)|pg|| pc|d7|nt|ahollan1: @C did force nab to guess -- would @H return by volker also have worked?|pg|| pc|d9|pc|d4|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|dT|pg|| pc|d6|pc|s5|pc|c8|pc|c9|pg|| mc|6|nt|ahollan1: nice d|pg|| pg|| qx|c2|st||md|4SAJT5HQ98DQ54CK53,SKQ97HA72DA82CT86,S32HKT63DT73CAQ97,S864HJ54DKJ96CJ42|sv|n|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|d|mb|1D|an|Hearts|mb|p|mb|1H!|an|3 crd H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sK|nt|ahollan2: NS convention card does not mention transfers over DBL -- guess we will have to wait for 2018 european championships for new CC|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s4|pc|s5|pg|| pc|c6|pc|cQ|pc|c2|pc|c5|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h4|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pg|| pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pc|cK|pg|| pc|h9|pc|h2|pc|h6|pc|hJ|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pc|d3|pg|| pc|d8|pc|dT|pc|dK|pc|d4|pg|| pc|d9|pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|d7|pg|| pc|s6|pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|s3|pg|| pc|c3|pc|cT|pc|cA|pc|c4|pg|| mc|7|pg|| qx|o3|st||md|1S7HK7DAKQ93CQT986,SAK9H9865D82CA752,ST82HAQJDJT7654CJ,SQJ6543HT432DCK43|sv|e|mb|1D|mb|d|nt|ahollan1: 1@D = 4+@D|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver thinking|pg|| nt|ritong: he s hoping to get the same result than rombaut|pg|| mb|r|nt|ritong: but chooses a different path|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: if Nab is balanced he has 13-15 hcp here|pg|| mb|4S|nt|ahollan1: RDBL did not occur to me|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: RDBL just points here, nothing special|pg|| mb|5C|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: just seems strange to start with RDBL with known 10+ fit in @D|pg|| mb|6D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: i was raised in world where "rdbl implies no fit"|pg|| nt|ritong: it is strange in itself, but it is the result of his reflection, which lasted like three minutes|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: seems like Drijver expected a better hand from south; or just gambling the @hK was @cA|pg|| nt|ritong: so, bob had a plan|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: expecting @h K onside|pg|| pc|cA|pc|cJ|pc|c4|pc|c6|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s3|pc|s7|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|c3|st||md|1S7HK7DAKQ93CQT986,SAK9H9865D82CA752,ST82HAQJDJT7654CJ,SQJ6543HT432DCK43|sv|e|mb|1D|mb|d|mb|3C!|mb|4S|mb|5C|mb|d|mb|5D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s3|pc|s7|pg|| pc|h9|pc|hJ|pc|h2|pc|h7|pg|| pc|d4|pc|s4|pc|dA|pc|d2|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d8|pc|d5|pc|s5|pg|| pc|c6|pc|cA|pc|cJ|pc|c3|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|o4|st||md|2SA6HT98754DAQTCJ6,SQHAK3D65CKQ85432,SKJ852H62D974CA97,ST9743HQJDKJ832CT|sv|b|mb|1C|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: Rombaut didn't overcall 1@s in the other room, let's see the differnce|pg|| mb|2H|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: responses to an overcall are NF, but constructive|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: for Drijver-Nab|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: unlike other pairs they do not seem to play 2-under transfers here|pg|| mb|d!|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: with 2@c = @h, 2@d = @s-fit|pg|| nt|ahollan1: i was just wondering what south would do if playing transfer advances IF auction continued 2@D-P-2@H-P|pg|| mb|3H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|cT|pc|c6|pg|| pc|h2|pc|hQ|pc|h5|pc|h3|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dT|pc|d6|pc|d4|pg|| pc|h4|pc|hK|pc|h6|pc|hJ|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c4|st||md|2SA6HT98754DAQTCJ6,SQHAK3D65CKQ85432,SKJ852H62D974CA97,ST9743HQJDKJ832CT|sv|b|mb|1C!|an|2+|mb|p|mb|1H!|nt|ahollan2: 1@C = 2+@C // 1@H= 4+@S|pg|| mb|d!|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan2: EW play transfer walsh // in other room nab-drijver play dutch doubleton|pg|| mb|p|pc|h6|pc|hJ|pc|h4|pc|h3|pg|| pc|cT|pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg|| pc|h2|pc|hQ|pc|h5|pc|hA|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|s3|pc|c6|pg|| pc|d6|pc|d4|pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pg|| mc|8|pg|| qx|o5|st||md|3S875HDKJ92CAQ7543,S2HAKQT864DQ7643C,SAKTHJ9DTCKJT9862,SQJ9643H7532DA85C|sv|n|nt|vugraphzdu: Nab: finally we're on the scoresheet|pg|| nt|ahollan1: only 3 voids on this board -- yawn|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: ('we staan erop' for the Dutch)|pg|| mb|1C!|nt|ahollan1: 1@C = forcing, 2+@C again|pg|| mb|1S|nt|vugraphzdu: again a difference in overcalling style|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Bessis 1@s, Verbeek 3@s|pg|| nt|ritong: NS got the best of it next room|pg|| mb|2H!|an|cue = !c / BAL|nt|ahollan1: verbeek-molenaar just not used to playing bridge with a pinochle deck|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: 2@h = @c-fit|pg|| nt|ahollan1: you had to go back to this boring hand??|pg|| mb|4H|nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver explains 2@h = a transfer = a cue-bid = usually @cs, but could also be balanced|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: is 5@c enough now?|pg|| mb|4S|nt|ahollan1: i just had flashback to when i first started playing - when 4@H was final contract, i was not sure who was on lead because south bid @H first|pg|| nt|ritong: considering that 7@h costs 300, the idea is to stop asap for NS|pg|| mb|5H|nt|vugraphzdu: but Volcker will save against anything|pg|| mb|6C|mb|6H|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dT|nt|ritong: true, so you have to decide to force them to sacrifice my point is, if they decide otherwise, you are happy at any level|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: 2nd/4th leads with standard from honors, so @d10 denies the Jack|pg|| pc|dA|nt|ahollan1: i wonder what the agreement is about drijver's DBL in a forcing situation|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d3|pg|| pc|h2|pc|c3|pc|hA|pc|h9|pg|| pc|hK|pc|hJ|pc|h3|pc|s8|pg|| pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s5|pg|| pc|c2|nt|vugraphzdu: i think regular penalty|pg|| pc|h5|pc|c4|pc|d4|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s7|nt|vugraphzdu: can make this contract if either: S has @sK or N had @sAK tight|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: both very unlikely by the @s8 discard earlier from Nab|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: which showed count|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: high-low = odd number in their case|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: ruffing would mean -2 as he will lose 2 more diamonds; running it is -1 as the diamond loser will go on the spades|pg|| nt|ritong: he s not awaken, imo|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Volcker still thinking|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: asked some question about carding, discards etc.|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: NS primarily show count|pg|| nt|ahollan1: i'm still thinking about play to the @C shift|pg|| pc|d6|pc|sK|pg|| nt|ritong: next|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: looks like he settled for -1|pg|| mc|11|nt|vugraphzdu: ok, thanks for watching, we will be back soon with the next session|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: next and final session|pg|| pg|| qx|c5|st||md|3S875HDKJ92CAQ7543,S2HAKQT864DQ7643C,SAKTHJ9DTCKJT9862,SQJ9643H7532DA85C|sv|n|mb|1C|mb|3S|mb|4S|mb|5H|mb|5S|mb|6H|mb|7C|mb|7H|nt|ahollan2: auctions like this happen all the time when you play bridge with a pinochle deck|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dT|pc|dA|pc|d2|pc|d7|pg|| pc|h2|pc|c5|pc|hA|pc|h9|pg|| pc|hK|pc|hJ|pc|h3|pc|c3|pg|| pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s5|pg|| pc|c2|pc|h5|pc|c4|pc|d3|pg|| pc|d5|pc|dK|pc|d4|mc|11|pg|| qx|o6|st||md|4SQT9HKQJ2DK2CKT52,SJ754H75DT765C763,SAK8632HA986D93C9,SHT43DAQJ84CAQJ84|sv|e|mb|1D|mb|d|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|3C|nt|ahollan1: yesterday while "in the well" on bridge winners chip martel was asked about a hand where he had slim chance to make [or go down 5] but settled for down 1 and picked up a bunch of ...|pg|| nt|ahollan1: imps|pg|| mb|p|mb|3D|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: not quite as much a difference for volcker on 5 but it did make me think about chip's board|pg|| nt|ritong: i remember that one was early 2010, right?|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c3|pc|c9|pg|| nt|ritong: perhaps 2009|pg|| pc|cQ|nt|ahollan1: in rosenblum cup match so had to be even year|pg|| nt|ritong: i was quite impressed by chip's judgment|pg|| pc|c5|pc|c6|pc|s2|pg|| pc|s3|pc|d4|pc|sQ|pc|s4|pg|| mc|11|nt|ritong: really not the "do or die" type|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: toilet break|pg|| nt|ahollan1: makes sense to be impressed with chip on many levels|pg|| nt|ritong: and jan too|pg|| nt|ahollan1: and over many decades|pg|| pg|| qx|c6|st||md|4SQT9HKQJ2DK2CKT52,SJ754H75DT765C763,SAK8632HA986D93C9,SHT43DAQJ84CAQJ84|sv|e|mb|1D|mb|d|mb|p|mb|2D|mb|3C|mb|d|mb|3D|nt|ahollan2: 1@D = 5+@D or 4441@C|pg|| mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c7|pc|c9|pg|| pc|dA|mc|11|pg|| qx|o7|st||md|1ST97HAJT95DQ32C97,SAJ4HK87D9CAKQJ62,SKQ2HQDAJT54CT854,S8653H6432DK876C3|sv|b|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|d|mb|p|mb|1S|nt|ahollan1: does anyone play 1-over-1 as forcing after partner overcalls?|pg|| mb|2D|mb|3C|mb|p|nt|ritong: same level forcing upper level encouraging|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: i am not aware of any north american vugraph pairs using forcing|pg|| pc|hQ|nt|ahollan1: thought some europeans may still play forcing|pg|| nt|ritong: you surely mean BPH|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Bessis joking: if you make this, I'll eat a rat|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver: OK, just made! we will help|pg|| nt|ritong: prepare the mayonnaise|pg|| nt|ahollan1: oh no i meant unpassed hand did not notice nab passed hand :(|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver: it's not bad; it's haute cuisine in the Netherlands|pg|| nt|ahollan1: sleep deprevation is a terrible thing -- the table chat now has me thinking of w.c. fields "of course i like children ... i like them boiled or fried"|pg|| nt|ritong: my version was " but not too raw"|pg|| pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h7|pg|| pc|h9|pc|hK|pc|c4|pc|h3|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: @h9 as a suit-preference here, denying interest in @s|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|d2|pc|d9|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Nab has bid 2@d, so he will have 3 diamonds|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver wondering now what the @d 2 implies|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: and how to continue|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s5|pc|sT|pc|sA|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c3|pc|c7|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c8|pc|s3|pc|c9|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|cT|pc|h4|pc|d3|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|d5|pc|d7|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|c6|pc|d4|pc|d8|pc|h5|pg|| pc|c2|pc|dT|pc|h6|pc|hT|pg|| pc|h8|nt|ahollan1: was there a downside to @C instead of shift to @S?|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s6|pc|hJ|pg|| mc|8|nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver not happy with the @s10 earlier|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Nab: sorry, didn't see this endplay coming|pg|| pg|| qx|c7|st||md|1ST97HAJT95DQ32C97,SAJ4HK87D9CAKQJ62,SKQ2HQDAJT54CT854,S8653H6432DK876C3|sv|b|mb|p|mb|1C!|an|2+|mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|2H!|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|hQ|pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h8|pg|| pc|h9|pc|hK|pc|c4|pc|h3|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|d2|pc|d9|pg|| nt|ahollan2: 5 bessis overcalls 1@S where verbeek bid 3@S but still a lot of high level action in the other room|pg|| nt|ahollan2: final contract 6@HX|pg|| pc|c5|pc|c3|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|cA|pc|cT|pc|d7|pc|c7|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c8|pc|d8|pc|d3|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|d4|pc|h4|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|c6|pc|d5|pc|h6|pc|h5|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s3|pc|s7|pg|| pc|s4|pc|sQ|pc|s5|pc|s9|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s6|pc|sT|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|dT|pc|dK|pc|hT|pc|h7|pg|| pc|s8|pc|hJ|pc|c2|pc|dJ|pg|| pg|| qx|o8|st||md|2S97HQ6DJ43CAKQJT6,SAQJ832HAK732DQTC,SKT5HJ984DK92C842,S64HT5DA8765C9753|sv|o|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: i think still easier for nab if drijver had stayed away from @S|pg|| mb|2C|mb|3H|mb|p|nt|ritong: i would bid 4@d|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: then declarer discards @dK and use @s 8x vs @s Jx as a trick (Nab needs to lead away from @s 9x)|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: sorry, that was a private response to a question why Drijver kept a useless diamond|pg|| nt|ahollan1: Henri - would you have responded 1N?|pg|| nt|ritong: can t have more than an ace perhaps a three cards fit, but|pg|| nt|ritong: yes|pg|| mb|3S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c2|nt|ritong: inspired decision, imho|pg|| nt|ahollan1: bessis going low sure worked here|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: normally 2nd/4th leads for NS, but 1/3/5 in partner's suit|pg|| pc|c3|pc|cT|pc|s2|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h5|pc|h6|pg|| pc|hK|pc|h8|pc|hT|pc|hQ|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h9|pc|s4|pc|s7|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Volcker: finesse the @s 5|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Drijver: wow, top player! He's a natural :)|pg|| nt|ahollan1: closed room just finished the set|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Bessis rising from his seat to congratulate Volcker on it :) :)|pg|| pc|cA|pc|s3|pc|c4|pc|c5|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hJ|pc|s6|pc|s9|pg|| pc|d4|pc|dT|nt|ahollan1: [sarcasm] terrible for the game when the contestants get along|pg|| pc|dK|pc|dA|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d3|pc|dQ|pc|d2|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|d6|pc|c6|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|d7|pc|cJ|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|c8|st||md|2S97HQ6DJ43CAKQJT6,SAQJ832HAK732DQTC,SKT5HJ984DK92C842,S64HT5DA8765C9753|sv|o|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|2C|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c2|pc|c3|pc|cA|pc|s2|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h5|pc|h6|pg|| pc|hK|pc|hJ|pc|hT|pc|hQ|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h8|pc|s6|pc|s7|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|s3|pc|c4|pc|c5|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h9|pc|s4|pc|s9|pg|| pc|cT|pc|s8|pc|c8|pc|c7|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|d5|pc|c6|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|d6|pc|cQ|pg|| pc|sT|pc|d7|pc|d3|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|h7|pc|d2|pc|c9|pc|cK|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|dA|pc|d4|pg|| pc|d8|pc|dJ|pc|dT|pc|d9|pg|| pg|| qx|o9|st||md|3S865HA873DJT62CKQ,SAQJ9HKJ942DQ9CA7,ST7432HDAK75CT942,SKHQT65D843CJ8653|sv|e|nt|vugraphzdu: last board of this set|pg|| nt|ahollan1: rule: when you are only in 3 - don't make overtrick that makes bidding look bad|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: we should restart at 12:00 (in 25 minutes)|pg|| mb|2S!|nt|vugraphzdu: but maybe we start a little bit earlier if everyone is ready|pg|| mb|p|mb|3S|nt|ahollan1: 2@S = weak, 5-10, 5M (nv:4)5+@C/@D|pg|| nt|ritong: tough to resist to 3NT|pg|| mb|4H|nt|ritong: molenaar did not|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: on this auction how much would volcker bet that his partner has @SK|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Volcker gambling on short spades and hopefully some @h fit in dummy|pg|| nt|ritong: well done fred|pg|| pc|dA|nt|vugraphzdu: not unreasonable when opps bid and raise spades and you have 4|pg|| pc|d3|pc|d2|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d4|pc|d6|pc|d9|pg|| pc|d7|pc|d8|pc|dT|pc|h2|pg|| nt|ahollan1: which is better down 1 in 3N or down 1 in 4@H?|pg|| pc|hK|pc|s4|pc|h5|nt|vugraphzdu: NS 1st discard count|pg|| nt|ritong: 4@h making with a better dummy would be my choice|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: a bit redundant in @s as 2@s showed exactly 5|pg|| nt|ritong: @sK is horrible news|pg|| pc|h3|pg|| pc|h4|pc|s2|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pg|| mc|9|nt|vugraphzdu: 3rd table still playing, but we restart after comparising|pg|| nt|ahollan1: oops forgot abouth them|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: i will ready board 5, but it got lost while I forgot to claim before going to the next board|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: *redo|pg|| pg|| qx|c9|st||md|3S865HA873DJT62CKQ,SAQJ9HKJ942DQ9CA7,ST7432HDAK75CT942,SKHQT65D843CJ8653|sv|e|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s7|pc|sK|pc|s5|pc|s9|pg|| pc|h5|pc|h3|pc|hK|pc|s4|pg|| pc|h2|pc|s3|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d3|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d4|pc|dT|pc|d9|pg|| pc|d6|pc|c7|pc|dA|pc|d8|pg|| pc|d7|pc|c3|pc|d2|pc|h4|pg|| mc|8|pg|| qx|o10|st||md|4SAK6HK987DQ62CQ62,S97432HQJTDK9C954,ST85H6542DT8CKJT3,SQJHA3DAJ7543CA87|sv|b|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2H!|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: 1NT = 15-17|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: 2@h a normal transfer|pg|| pc|d6|nt|vugraphzdu: 2nd/4th leads for NS, upside-down signals|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Nab had identical minors to choose from, chose the wrong one here|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dT|pc|dJ|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: Bessis asking about leads; Drijver explains 2nd/4th and with 4 small they also lead 2nd|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: so Bessis knows the diamond position now|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|d8|pg|| pc|hT|pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|hK|pg|| pc|h7|pc|hJ|pc|h4|pc|hA|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|s2|pc|s5|pg|| pc|c6|pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|c7|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: switches also 2nd/4th|pg|| pc|c3|pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c5|pg|| pc|dA|pc|dQ|pc|c9|pc|s8|pg|| pc|h5|pc|d3|pc|h8|pc|hQ|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sT|pc|sJ|pc|sA|pg|| mc|8|pg|| qx|c10|st||md|4SAK6HK987DQ62CQ62,S97432HQJTDK9C954,ST85H6542DT8CKJT3,SQJHA3DAJ7543CA87|sv|b|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2H!|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c2|pc|c4|pc|cT|pc|c7|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c8|pc|cQ|pc|c5|pg|| pc|c6|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pc|cA|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s5|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|d8|pc|d3|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s8|pc|sJ|pc|sK|pg|| pc|s6|pc|s7|pc|sT|pc|d4|pg|| pc|h6|pc|h3|pc|hK|pc|hT|pg|| mc|7|pg|| qx|o11|st||md|1S76542H862D9CK862,S98HQT4DQ7654CA95,SJHAK973DKT2CJT73,SAKQT3HJ5DAJ83CQ4|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|1S|mb|2H!|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: Nab alerts 2@h, showing a thumbs down, indicating a weak raise|pg|| mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: 2@d would have been a good raise|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdu: missed 3NT now|pg|| nt|ahollan1: NS use transfers by responder after both 1@H-DBL and 1@H-1@S|pg|| mb|p|pc|d2|nt|ahollan1: theme for tonight -- NS opening lead @Dx does not make declarer nervous|pg|| nt|ahollan1: oops not night at venue|pg|| nt|ahollan1: here 01:30|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: early morning here|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: 10:30|pg|| pc|d3|pc|d9|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|d4|pc|dK|pc|dA|pc|h2|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|s5|pc|d5|pc|dT|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s8|pc|sJ|pg|| mc|11|nt|vugraphzdu: players agreed on making 5|pg|| pg|| qx|c11|st||md|1S76542H862D9CK862,S98HQT4DQ7654CA95,SJHAK973DKT2CJT73,SAKQT3HJ5DAJ83CQ4|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|1S|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|3H|mb|d|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h2|pc|h4|pc|h9|pc|hJ|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s8|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|s9|pc|h7|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d2|pc|dJ|pc|d9|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s5|pc|hT|pc|h3|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s6|pc|hQ|pc|c3|pg|| pc|sT|pc|s7|pc|c5|pc|c7|pg|| pc|dA|pc|c2|pc|d5|pc|dT|pg|| pc|c4|pc|c6|pc|cA|pc|cT|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|o12|st||md|2SJHKQ85DQJT9C9532,SQT976HA76D62C874,S54HT932DK53CAKQT,SAK832HJ4DA874CJ6|sv|n|mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|1S|nt|ahollan1: 1@C= forcing, 2+@C|pg|| nt|vugraphzdu: 1@c = 2+, NS play Dutch doubleton|pg|| mb|d|mb|2N!|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dQ|nt|vugraphzdu: should north have bid 3@h over 2NT?|pg|| mc|9|nt|vugraphzdu: Bessis quickly claims|pg|| pg|| qx|c12|st||md|2SJHKQ85DQJT9C9532,SQT976HA76D62C874,S54HT932DK53CAKQT,SAK832HJ4DA874CJ6|sv|n|mb|2S|mb|d|mb|4S|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cK|pc|c6|pc|c3|pc|c8|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|cJ|pc|c5|pc|c4|pg|| pc|h9|pc|hJ|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pg|| pc|s6|pc|s4|pc|sA|pc|sJ|pg|| nt|ahollan2: this is final board of the set|pg|| mc|9|nt|ahollan2: one more 12-board segment today|pg|| nt|ahollan2: other room 1.5 boards to play|pg|| pg||