BBO Discussion Forums: yet another suit combination - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

yet another suit combination

#1 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2005-September-09, 22:34

Another one that came up at the table today:

KQ98xx

x

best play for 4 tricks?
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#2 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-September-10, 10:09

I think I would have gotten this wrong at the table:
Spoiler

The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2005-September-10, 21:49

I agree with your answer Arend. Next time you will get it right.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-September-11, 00:48

Yes, Playing to pin Jx or Tx is twice as likely as playing for Ax. Additionally, RHO would never duck Ax offside but should ALWAYS duck with AJxx or ATxx so it's really 4 times as likely (Jx or Tx in either hand vs Ax on your left). 3-3 is irrelevant.
0

#5 User is offline   Flame 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,085
  • Joined: 2004-March-26
  • Location:Israel

Posted 2005-September-11, 03:20

Yes, had wrong first instint too.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users