What is your lead?
#1
Posted 2005-September-10, 03:15
♥ 82
♦ Q76
♣ QJ4
LHO opens a strong club (16+), and RHO responds 2NT (16+ balanced). The next you see is 6NT to your left, all pass.
What is your lead, and please let us know what your reasoning is.
Roland
#2
Posted 2005-September-10, 03:34
Walddk, on Sep 10 2005, 04:15 AM, said:
♥ 82
♦ Q76
♣ QJ4
LHO opens a strong club (16+), and RHO responds 2NT (16+ balanced). The next you see is 6NT to your left, all pass.
What is your lead, and please let us know what your reasoning is.
Roland
8 of h..attack..eerrr.. passive..errr my lead?
#3
Posted 2005-September-10, 03:55
#4
Posted 2005-September-10, 04:38
#5
Posted 2005-September-10, 11:06
Both opponents are balanced, so lets assume spades are 5-3-3-2.
The opponents probably have the A K Q of spades so will only make 3 tricks in that suit. The suit may be 5-4-3-1 or 5-4-2-2. In that case pard might have the 10. Or LHO may have it and not play it and pards 9 forces an honor. OR RHO may have a doubleton honor like KQ and not play high.
I think the spade lead is the most passive and least likely to give anything away.
The heart 8 may finesse pards Q.
#6
Posted 2005-September-10, 11:10
From my perspective, there are two reasonable choices:
1. Going very passive. If I chose to go this route, I'd lead a low spade.
2. Attacking and trying to establish a second trick before the opponents can run their 12. In this case, a low Diamond looks right since I'm more likely to get in with a Club...
Attacking seems right to me.
I'm leading a Diamond...
#7
Posted 2005-September-10, 11:16
btw still leading a heart
#8
Posted 2005-September-10, 13:19
♥ lead may pick off partner's (unlikely) Queen or (much more likely) J. I expect LHO to hold no 4 card major (or be 4333 with a weak major) but that is no reason to expect declarer to hold no 4 card major. If he holds one, it will very probably be ♥
♦ spot lead is insane. It cannot possibly set up a fast trick for us: partner cannot hold the K, and it may well give away a trick. If I was told that I had to lead a ♦, it would be the Q: playing partner for the J, and hoping to fool declarer. That is so unlikely a parlay that I will not try it.
However, if I were on vugraph late in a big match needing to pick up swings, than that's my lead: at least it would give the commentators something to talk about.
♣lead requires partner to hold the 10: a very specific card in a suit in which the opps rate to hold 7 cards (or more) and partner only 2 or 3.
The ♠ rates to give away the least. And I lead a high ♠ just in case partner has 10x or Qx: I want to look like someone going passive from xxxx or xxxxx. If our style is the 5 (second highest from xxx) that is the card I lead.
#9
Posted 2005-September-10, 18:44
#10 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-September-10, 18:47
#11
Posted 2005-September-10, 19:14
#12
Posted 2005-September-10, 19:59
There is little left, if anything, for partner, so we must find a passive lead in my opinion. Interestingly, a spade seems more passive than a heart. Partner may have the jack of hearts without the 10 and only four of them, and then we run the risk of presenting declarer with four heart tricks.
A spade might work out even if partner doesn't have the 10. The opponents could have a 3-3 or 3-2 fit. The auction suggests that opener is balanced as well when I look at my holdings in the minors.
We know that we have five spades, we cannot be certain that partner has five hearts. Hence my choice of a low/middle spade.
Roland

Help
