BBO Discussion Forums: Canape Systems Which Are Not Strong Club - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Canape Systems Which Are Not Strong Club

#1 User is offline   pbleighton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,153
  • Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2005-September-13, 19:43

Does anyone know of a writeup of such a system (in English)?

I have a BTC document, but haven't been able to find any "natural canape". Is it a practical approach?

Peter
0

#2 User is offline   SteelWheel 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 136
  • Joined: 2003-October-10

Posted 2005-September-13, 20:40

Isn't the Hackett brothers' "The Science" basically a canape and natural system? I forget the details, but I seem to recall reading a basic write-up in rgb at some point... Give it a search and see what you come up with.
0

#3 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,735
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2005-September-13, 20:40

Well, here's one:

http://www.firesides.net/valintro.htm
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#4 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2005-September-13, 22:38

SteelWheel, on Sep 14 2005, 12:40 PM, said:

Isn't the Hackett brothers' "The Science" basically a canape and natural system? I forget the details, but I seem to recall reading a basic write-up in rgb at some point... Give it a search and see what you come up with.

No. The Hacketts do open 4 card Mjs in preferences to minors with weak hands, but they do not play a canape system. If memory serves me well, Roman is a canape system and does not have a strong C, though 1C is forcing.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#5 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,345
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-September-13, 22:45

Ya in Roman 1c=4 way..some of which are very strong..
Most common is 12-16 and 4333 or 4432
0

#6 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,735
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2005-September-14, 00:49

Hmm here's one that's a strong ♥ system. Amazing the things you can find on the web.

http://homepages.par...jbabor/boh.html
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#7 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2005-September-14, 04:09

I don't think canape works too well with unlimited openers - for a start, responder can give preference to opener's first suit much less often.
0

#8 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2005-September-14, 05:58

awm, on Sep 14 2005, 07:49 AM, said:

Hmm here's one that's a strong ♥ system. Amazing the things you can find on the web.

http://homepages.par...jbabor/boh.html

Looks like a modified version of a strong pass system, with the fert and pass switched. :) But it's not a pure canapé system, since it's just 'possible canapé'. With 5♠-4♥ you'll show ♠ first, but in canapé systems you should show the ♥s first :)

I agree with MickyB that it's probably not such good idea to play canapé without limited openers...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users