The phantom censor
#1
Posted 2005-July-27, 18:59
Censor individual's posts if necessary and if they are offensive to another individual, but point out where they have been censored and give reasons why. The person deleting this thread owes the whole board an apology - you might moderate the board, but you don't own it. Surely this board belongs to all contributors.
#2
Posted 2005-July-28, 01:07
#3
Posted 2005-July-28, 02:13
whereagles, on Jul 28 2005, 02:07 AM, said:
But unless they actually ARE children, they require no protection.
Well, perhaps they are.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees."Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
#4
Posted 2005-July-28, 04:49
whereagles, on Jul 28 2005, 02:07 AM, said:
too subjective... i could hypothetically say that, in my opinion, 90% of your posts are childish and just delete them...
i heard my 5 year old grandson tell my 3 year old grandson, "you're acting like a child" ... go figure
#5
Posted 2005-July-28, 05:06
#6
Posted 2005-July-28, 05:09
whereagles, on Jul 28 2005, 06:06 AM, said:
Still, moderating a thread and deleting a thread is a big difference.
I don't know what have the involved persons said to each other, but I am sure that a good part of this thread was good, interesting and clean - and I hate it when somebody exercises his/her moderator rights in such a brute measure.
BTW, being childish is nothing to have posts deleted for.
#7
Posted 2005-July-28, 05:49
This Invision Power Board offers filters to secure that a debate can be limited to using decent language.
I think controversial postings are not about odd bid-sequences but more substantial stuff with persons acting in a specific way. If such stuff is handled in a responsible way there is no good reason for any kind of intervention.
In general I prefer and I would very much like to see BBO to take proper action against persons violating the basic rules for decent human behavior as outlined in 'Rules for these sites'. All too much on BBO, not only in BBO Forum, looks like happening according to the 11th command:"Unless you are caught - it will be OK".
#8
Posted 2005-July-28, 07:22
If we prefer I can remove the nonbridge content and restore the thread.
.
#9
Posted 2005-July-28, 07:37
#10
Posted 2005-July-28, 07:54
uday, on Jul 28 2005, 08:22 AM, said:
If we prefer I can remove the nonbridge content and restore the thread.
.
This would be most welcome. I think that the majority of readers would know EXACTLY where to make the dividing line. (If I recall correctly, it was a post that said stupid twice in the first sentence
#11
Posted 2005-July-28, 08:05
uday, on Jul 28 2005, 03:22 PM, said:
If we prefer I can remove the nonbridge content and restore the thread.
.
Pity - makes no sense Uday!
The violation of the basic principles for freedom of expression you have violated. As I remember you have defended those rights earlier here in this Forum.
#12
Posted 2005-July-28, 08:19
Having said that I think that we need to understand that just the fact of being BBO members and regular forum posters make us a group and we are very close to being a group of friends, we don't see each other but we share a passion (bridge) we share that we like debating about bridge, we share that we like/have or use a computer.
If we are friends then we must understand that a comment can't really be made with the intention of offending somebody, we bridge players, love to say nasty things about bids or things we don't like but that doesn't mean we have something against the person behind the bid, play or idea.
"What happens at the table stays at the table"
I guess that unless a person declares himself offended we don't need to censor acid comments or even comments that may look insulting. Sometimes rude language is the way a person uses to express his bridge opinion about something but I'm sure it's never personal.
In my particular case you can say whatever you want about my ideas, bids or plays I know you are talking about my bridge ideas and not me so I will never take offense and it may be in some way fun :-). Things like "Luis how can you be such an idiot?" are fine to me, my pd says things like that all the time :-)
Relax, post some ideas, have fun, isn't that the idea?
Luis
#13
Posted 2005-July-28, 08:26
#14
Posted 2005-July-28, 08:38
#15
Posted 2005-July-28, 08:43
luis, on Jul 28 2005, 05:19 PM, said:
Strange, I've never heard that from a partner. And I'd be pretty surprised to hear it, since my name is not Luis
Seriously, Luis has a point. Not only we should try not to offend others, but also not to be too easily offended.
Petko
#16
Posted 2005-July-28, 08:52
Let me quote from the Constitution of the Kingdom of Denmark:
Censur og andre forebyggende forholdsregler kan ingensinde påny indføres.
This translates to:
Censorship and other preventive measures can never be reintroduced.
I accept that the BBO Forums are not ruled by our constitution, but I find it sad that an entire thread is deleted as a consequence of one or more insulting or defamatory posts (I don't even know what they are).
Maybe we are just paranoid.
Roland
#17
Posted 2005-July-28, 09:47
You can delete entire threads from the moment someone violates rules (or if a certain someone interpretes some words the wrong way). Nobody likes it, the forum loses some thread which might've been interesting, why not close the entire discussion group (advanced & expert-class bridge) or even the entire forum?,...
However, you can also just remove the 'offensive' material, post something about your actions, maybe punish the offender, but at least leave everyone else alone and don't punish them. If you can solve the problem by deleting 1 post (or just a few), then I even find it unacceptable to lock or delete a thread.
We all know we're from different countries, sometimes language gets translated or interpreted the wrong way. Can't we at least be a little understanding and reasonable before taking radical actions???
#18
Posted 2005-July-28, 10:36
Walddk, on Jul 28 2005, 04:52 PM, said:
Let me quote from the Constitution of the Kingdom of Denmark:
Censur og andre forebyggende forholdsregler kan ingensinde påny indføres.
This translates to:
Censorship and other preventive measures can never be reintroduced.
I accept that the BBO Forums are not ruled by our constitution, but I find it sad that an entire thread is deleted as a consequence of one or more insulting or defamatory posts (I don't even know what they are).
Maybe we are just paranoid.
Roland
This is what is violated here:
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
In other languages you find here: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Sad to say - but in general we in Europe have the impression that those binding rules are violated by americans when they become unbequem - but it is such cases they are really needed.
Uday and BBO, please see to that appropriate measures now will be taken so we can avoid more of those kind of disastrous and unworthy methods.
#19
Posted 2005-July-28, 10:44
csdenmark, on Jul 28 2005, 11:36 AM, said:
Walddk, on Jul 28 2005, 04:52 PM, said:
Let me quote from the Constitution of the Kingdom of Denmark:
Censur og andre forebyggende forholdsregler kan ingensinde påny indføres.
This translates to:
Censorship and other preventive measures can never be reintroduced.
I accept that the BBO Forums are not ruled by our constitution, but I find it sad that an entire thread is deleted as a consequence of one or more insulting or defamatory posts (I don't even know what they are).
Maybe we are just paranoid.
Roland
This is what is violated here:
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
In other languages you find here: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Sad to say - but in general we in Europe have the impression that those binding rules are violated by americans when they become unbequem - but it is such cases they are really needed.
Uday and BBO, please see to that appropriate measures now will be taken so we can avoid more of those kind of disastrous and unworthy methods.
This sounds very very wrong.
So Pedophiles have the right to freedom of opinion and expression in the media? Pedophiles have right to seek, receive and impart information through any media and regardless of frontiers?
There must be many many limits and interference of freedom of expression, that is called Censorship in one form or another by any stretch of the definition.
Think about it folks freedom of expression is a very very broad term, that is why it is censored in many ways.
I have been to Denmark, trust me freedom of expression is limited and is censorsed just as it is in every country. Try expressing your freedom on your neighbor's lawn at 3 am in Denmark and they will show you some Censorship.
#20
Posted 2005-July-28, 10:46
Uday, I prefer you to delete posts if needed and not the whole thread and I'd like if possible to only do that when there's a complaint from somebody. Having said that we must land on earth, we are all in a house, and we should accept that in this house there're some rules that we must follow.
Let's not make something really big of this, I think we all prefer moderators to delete only posts, not threads and we prefer them to do that only in extreme circunstances, however we'll accept the rules and be happy and relaxed posters.
Luis

Help
