Axx
Axx
KT9
KT9x
x
xxx
Axx
Axxxxx
Bidding went
1NT (2S) 2NT* (X)
3C
all pass
2NT was Lebensohl, no agreement over 3C or the X
3NT was cold. Whose fault was this?
Page 1 of 1
Who's fault was this one?
#2
Posted 2005-August-14, 14:03
both, since you don't make agreements over Dbl...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#3
Posted 2005-August-14, 14:12
i don't think this is anyone's fault.. you're playing weak nt evidently, south bid leb, you bid 3c, he passed... so what if 3nt was cold *this* time?
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#5
Posted 2005-August-14, 14:43
I cant say 4 aces and 2 kings is always a cold 3nt (it may be this time, but I bet the odds are against you, just one card adrift on clubs and after a major lead you are probably down, I think 3 clubs is a good contract
#6
Posted 2005-August-14, 14:59
Lebensohl (and other similar methods) allow you to differentiate between two types of hand - strong and non-strong.
Unfortunately there are three types of hand that you may hold in a competitive auction - weak, invitational and strong - and so you have to decide which two to show. Most of us agree that it's best to have a strong sequence, and so we chose between dropping the weak or invitational single-suited hand.
My choice is to show invitational hands and not have a mechanism to show weak ones - however it would be a stretch (inspired?) to call this one invitational with such poor club pips.
I guess you are probably giving up on the invitational hands (otherwise partner may have shown club acceptance) - both methods are eminently playable but it is just worth checking you have the same agreement
I wouldn't be too worried about missing this game.
Paul
Unfortunately there are three types of hand that you may hold in a competitive auction - weak, invitational and strong - and so you have to decide which two to show. Most of us agree that it's best to have a strong sequence, and so we chose between dropping the weak or invitational single-suited hand.
My choice is to show invitational hands and not have a mechanism to show weak ones - however it would be a stretch (inspired?) to call this one invitational with such poor club pips.
I guess you are probably giving up on the invitational hands (otherwise partner may have shown club acceptance) - both methods are eminently playable but it is just worth checking you have the same agreement
I wouldn't be too worried about missing this game.
Paul
#7
Posted 2005-August-14, 16:19
Nobodys fault.
2NT was bid with the intention to sign off in 3C?
This let to a perfect part score. wtp?
With kind regards
Marlowe
2NT was bid with the intention to sign off in 3C?
This let to a perfect part score. wtp?
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Page 1 of 1

Help
