An interesting and crucial hand in the match between Egypt and Israel at the World Youth Team Championship in Sydney. The deal has been rotated for convenience.
West passes, and after 1♦ by the Israeli North, East overcalls 1♠. You pass, pass by LHO, and partner re-opens with a double. You decide to bid 1NT and are raised to 3NT (I know perfectly well that North did some daisy-picking before 3NT was reached, but that is beside the point).
West leads ♠Q and switches to ♣3 (4th best). You duck in order to get some count. RHO wins the queen and returns ♣7, LHO following with the 5. The moment of truth has arrived (if the hand can be made at all):
Do you cash diamonds from the top or do you enter your hand with a heart and finesse ♦10 when West follows small? A priori, going for the drop of ♦J is superior to the finesse. The question is, however, if odds have changed now that you *know* that spades are 2-5 or 1-6? It is also likely that clubs are 4-3.
Roland
P.S. I was happy to see Israel and Egypt playing against each other. That has not always been possible as you may know. If only this could be achieved at all times for all nations, but sadly we are surrounded by (mostly) non bridge playing politicians.
P.P.S. I have no intention of starting a political debate. Thanks.

Help

S: 3NT
Lead: SQ