BBO Discussion Forums: Where and how? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Where and how? Getting to slam.

#21 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2005-July-31, 12:17

I'm going to play in 6C or 7C and start with 4C. I would be slightly disappointed when playing in 6C when I see this dummy, but broadly smiling after seeing the bad break. Would be nice to get to 7C on these hands though.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#22 User is offline   HeartA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,016
  • Joined: 2004-October-17

Posted 2005-August-01, 00:30

coyot, on Jul 28 2005, 08:52 AM, said:

I believe that 3♠ is a good way how to establish a "strong" hand - so that when partner bids 3NT, your 4♣ will be seen as very strong. (Or, if he bids 4♥, 5♣ will serve the same purpose...

Agree.
Senshu
0

#23 User is offline   coyot 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 487
  • Joined: 2005-July-09

Posted 2005-August-01, 02:43

HeartA, on Aug 1 2005, 01:30 AM, said:

coyot, on Jul 28 2005, 08:52 AM, said:

I believe that 3♠ is a good way how to establish a "strong" hand - so that when partner bids 3NT, your 4♣ will be seen as very strong. (Or, if he bids 4♥, 5♣ will serve the same purpose...

Agree.

I've been convinced by the vast majority here that this was the wrong way - 3♠ would be most likely fit-showing strong hand with 4♣ then promising a cue-bid, whereas direct 4♣ is undoubtedly a forcing bid.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users