BBO Discussion Forums: What to do with 1D-p-2C. - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What to do with 1D-p-2C. When you don't have a forcing NT.

#1 User is offline   WasWinM 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 387
  • Joined: 2025-April-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:varied

Posted Yesterday, 14:59

To simplify, it would be nice to have the auction of 1D-P-2C be game forcing. A problem ss what to do with hands just below game forcing? Do you still play 1NT in this auction as forcing to take care of those hands or do you revert back to a SAYC style one-round force only 2C?
0

#2 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,714
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted Yesterday, 15:32

No one plays 1nt forcing over 1 as far as I know. The usual combination if you want 2 response game forcing is:

2nt = invite, around 11 balanced no 4M.
3 = invite with 6+
Inverted minor raises

You can move some things around if you’re willing to use an artificial 2 and/or 2 response..
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
1

#3 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,846
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted Yesterday, 15:44

View PostWasWinM, on 2026-September-02, 14:59, said:

To simplify, it would be nice to have the auction of 1D-P-2C be game forcing. A problem is what to do with hands just below game forcing? Do you still play 1NT in this auction as forcing to take care of those hands or do you revert back to a SAYC style one-round force only 2C?

You already know my answer to this Winston! Just switch it around so that 1 covers INV+ hands and 1, 1NT and 2m are weak. That allows you to start your GF auctions at 1NT. This works best with relays but can also be adapted to a more natural approach. You do need 1 to be 4+ for this, so the 1 opening has to cover all of the balanced hands outside of range, but it does solve the issue. Given the efficiency of Transfer Walsh, that is a change that might even be a good thing more generally...
(-: Zel :-)
0

#4 User is offline   mw64ahw 

  • nonconformist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,176
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted Yesterday, 15:59

As you may have seen my Esoteric Unbalanced 3+ uses 1 as game invitational with opener subsequently showing shape with space to stop below game. Playing 3+ also has the advantage of removing the death hands from a 1 opening.

Weak hands can play in a Moysian with 1 being either/both Majors facilitating this.

Further invites (INV) with 9/10 are
2N xx43
3 x46x
3 4x6x
3N xx64
0

#5 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,122
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 18:54

 WasWinM, on 2026-September-02, 14:59, said:

To simplify, it would be nice to have the auction of 1D-P-2C be game forcing. A problem ss what to do with hands just below game forcing? Do you still play 1NT in this auction as forcing to take care of those hands or do you revert back to a SAYC style one-round force only 2C?


What exactly is the problem deal?
0

#6 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,820
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 20:33



This type of hand causes me to break tempo
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
0

#7 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,122
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 21:01

 jillybean, on 2026-September-02, 20:33, said:



This type of hand causes me to break tempo


1NT

Note the NV opponents are silent, so far..also you are an UPH....
Also in general you don't want to push to game at MP.


Now add in you are flat with no Aces
0

#8 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,820
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 23:01

View Postmike777, on 2026-September-02, 21:01, said:

1NT

Note the NV opponents are silent, so far..also you are an UPH....
Also in general you don't want to push to game at MP.


Now add in you are flat with no Aces

Mainly IMP games now
What is your 1nt opening range?
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
0

#9 User is offline   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,592
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted Today, 00:49

I agree with Adam's structure. I think it is common to play something like:

  • 1: 4+
  • 1: 4+
  • 1NT: 6-9 no 4cM, usually no (4)5c.
  • 2: GF, [5(+) or 3=3=3=4]
  • 2: 4+, inv(+)
  • 2: your choice
  • 2: your choice
  • 2NT: 10-11 no 4cM, no 4c, no 6c (so '3=3=3=5 minus a card')
  • 3: 9-11 no 4cM, no 4c, 6(+)
  • 3: (4)5+, mixed raise

Personally I prefer for 1NT to be 6-11 ('semiforcing') instead, freeing up 2NT for the 0-5 hcp (4)5+ 'garbage raise', along with all the usual costs and benefits of a wide range NT response. This is a minority position, though.

Of course if your 1 opening regularly contains not that many diamonds you may want a little extra shape for raising, which means you'll need to overload the NT responses more. That's why I put some weird lower limits on length in the raise structure. You can e.g. decide that some balanced hands should be moved out of the inverted minor raise and be put in 2NT or 2, for example, though I recommend against it.
0

#10 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,257
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted Today, 06:29

 jillybean, on 2026-September-02, 20:33, said:



This type of hand causes me to break tempo


My addled brain says 2NT with lots of time to spare
0

#11 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,820
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Today, 08:00

My brain, which still wants to bid with any 13 cards, considers 2♣. Disciplined me says 2NT, but never 1NT 6-9 is not this hand
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
0

#12 User is offline   WasWinM 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 387
  • Joined: 2025-April-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:varied

Posted Today, 11:08

Thanks for all the answers. This post came up while reading another post where the auction began 1D-P-2C and a poster said that now that your are in a game forcing auction .... made me think, how is that a game forcing auction, and then, what do you do with less than game forcing?
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users