Is there a way to avoid the 3 nt with a plausible bid?
Page 1 of 1
all togheter 3nt ?
#2
Posted Today, 01:36
Give West a chance to bid 2S.
But assuming normale agreements, I happen to play myself, for whats it worth, the answer is no.
But assuming normale agreements, I happen to play myself, for whats it worth, the answer is no.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted Today, 03:08
Possibly with the 5-card Major ask I play
2N - 3♣
3♥ 2♠ & 2/3♥
Now I play
3♠ relay to 3N followed by 4♣ is my limit
3N 55xx
4♣ SI
However, the temptation is still there to assume opener has Hx♠
2N - 3♣
3♥ 2♠ & 2/3♥
Now I play
3♠ relay to 3N followed by 4♣ is my limit
3N 55xx
4♣ SI
However, the temptation is still there to assume opener has Hx♠
#4
Posted Today, 03:19
We play the more natural version of what MW64 plays
same meaning but 2N-3♣-3N as neither 3♠ nor 4♥.
I would use the ask in case partner has 5♥, not sure if I'd remove 3N
Unless you can see opps hands, there is no game on, so 5M gains you little at IMPs, but -1 vs -2 at MPs (where you're even less likely to move from 3N) might matter
same meaning but 2N-3♣-3N as neither 3♠ nor 4♥.
I would use the ask in case partner has 5♥, not sure if I'd remove 3N
Unless you can see opps hands, there is no game on, so 5M gains you little at IMPs, but -1 vs -2 at MPs (where you're even less likely to move from 3N) might matter
#5
Posted Today, 05:49
cencio, on 2026-August-28, 01:12, said:
Is there a way to avoid the 3 nt with a plausible bid?
Other than the result, why would you want to? If spades were singleton, that would be different.
That's what you have to accept when you choose to open 2NT. Goren 1960 required a minimum of Kxx in a suit. That's ridiculous, but would help here.
#6
Posted Today, 06:23
No way to avoid. Sometimes they block S or do not lead them. Imagine swapping W and E. So no reason with 2 balanced hands to be somewhere else than 3NT (unless opps mentionned S in the bidding).
Page 1 of 1

Help
