BBO Discussion Forums: sometime results are false - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1

sometime results are false

#1 User is offline   cencio 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 248
  • Joined: 2017-August-11

Posted Today, 00:09

playing a robot tournament

par 3nt+1
traveller:4HW-2 99,1%. 4HE-1 74.37% 4HW-1 74,37%. 3NE 47.67%. 4HW 43.73% 3nE + 1 27.24%.
considerations:some robots play with a seventh fit in H. the par gets 27%. Some robots lose an extra trick.
0

#2 User is offline   apollo1201 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2014-June-01

Posted Today, 02:55

DD par and what really happens at the table are different things.

I ve recently played some country-wide tourneys (same deals in every club, 1000+ pairs overall), and it was quite common to see scores from -800 to +800 on partscore deals.

Sometimes the par requires a complex play (or being in a contract you normally not reach, or a delicate slam not all pairs will find) and making it achieves a strong % when many butchered the play.

Or an unfindable lead says par is +140 while everyone scores 620, even against competent defenders.

The level of the pairs that play can also play a big role in the result.

I d not pay over attention to the par.
0

#3 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,200
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted Today, 04:35

OK, spectacular example:



What contract would you like to be in at MPs ?

Well clearly 7N requiring only a 2-1 club break is the winner. Also consider it from S's pov alone, knowing partner has 2 aces and may have a club, even more in favour of 7N. With the clubs opening 4N(specific aces)-5N(2)-7N

Par is 6= (or a sac by opps) because clubs are 3-0 and the hand with 3 had enough other cards to double so 7N scored -2300

You need to think whether the par is reasonable.
0

#4 User is offline   cencio 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 248
  • Joined: 2017-August-11

Posted Today, 05:47

View PostCyberyeti, on 2026-July-16, 04:35, said:

OK, spectacular example:



What contract would you like to be in at MPs ?

Well clearly 7N requiring only a 2-1 club break is the winner. Also consider it from S's pov alone, knowing partner has 2 aces and may have a club, even more in favour of 7N. With the clubs opening 4N(specific aces)-5N(2)-7N

Par is 6= (or a sac by opps) because clubs are 3-0 and the hand with 3 had enough other cards to double so 7N scored -2300

You need to think whether the par is reasonable.

the problem is not so much the par that does not obtain a good result. But the fact that robots go to a wrong contract with a seventh fit. And that some of them play by losing one trick more than their other "colleagues"
0

#5 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,200
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted Today, 06:27

View Postcencio, on 2026-July-16, 05:47, said:

the problem is not so much the par that does not obtain a good result. But the fact that robots go to a wrong contract with a seventh fit. And that some of them play by losing one trick more than their other "colleagues"


Different auctions, different leads, is east the only non robot ?
0

#6 User is offline   cencio 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 248
  • Joined: 2017-August-11

Posted Today, 07:56

View PostCyberyeti, on 2026-July-16, 06:27, said:

Different auctions, different leads, is east the only non robot ?

South is the human.
rather than false it is better to say distorted
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users