"Bridge is Cool"
#1
Posted 2005-July-25, 14:22
I ran across a rather front page article regarding the ACBL's efforts
to target young players. As usual, I'm like to applaud the ACBL for
recognizing the need to increase this demographic. With this said and
done, I have some concerns regarding implementation...
More specifically, does anyone else cringe when they hear the title for
the new web site. I'm really not sure whether "Bridge is Cool" is
really going to grab the attention of todays media savey youth. In all
seriousness, I haven't heard the expression "cool" used in 30 years...
#2
Posted 2005-July-25, 14:49
Once again, I feel shorted.
#3
Posted 2005-July-25, 15:32
#4
Posted 2005-July-25, 16:20
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#5
Posted 2005-July-25, 16:42
A great danger I sense.
We must teach the force to those young padawans before they start with the Standard Sith system.
Use the force Richard!
#6
Posted 2005-July-25, 18:12
By the way they think bridge sucks;-)
Like opera.
As a parent you should not try to hard
#7
Posted 2005-July-26, 07:19
btw the ACBL should be going after the kitchen bridgers of which there are 25 million in the US. Just oblige club directors to hold a free "kitchen" game once a month. We all know people who are afraid to play duplicate but actually like the game per se......
#8
Posted 2005-July-26, 07:46
Quote
How does that work? I'd be sort of afraid to play in such kitchen games, playing with sharp knives nearby.
#9
Posted 2005-July-26, 07:49
Gerben42, on Jul 26 2005, 08:46 AM, said:
Quote
How does that work? I'd be sort of afraid to play in such kitchen games, playing with sharp knives nearby.
Well, the high school part was sort of directed to youthful types.....hehehe
For the kitchen bridge variety, they could even offer to hold 2 table Howell movement duplicates in the Kitchen bridgers homes. Mrs. Jones finally gets to prove that she is better than Mrs. Smith....
#10
Posted 2005-July-27, 19:44
I couldn't believe the lack of awareness of their audience.
-Elianna
#11
Posted 2005-July-28, 06:27
I couldn't believe the lack of awareness of their audience."
Don't trust anyone over 30!
Peter
#12
Posted 2005-July-28, 11:29
Turn on, Tune in, Get high on bridge
lets face it Poker on TV has done everything that bridge would like to have been able to do.
#13
Posted 2005-July-28, 13:09
pigpenz, on Jul 28 2005, 12:29 PM, said:
Because the human element is accentuated, not the complexities nor the subtleties. To get mass appeal you need to get visceral.
Everyone understands losing your shirt on a bet, most know that 3 of a kind beats 2 pair, few understand the subtle ecstacy of pulling off a coup or other obscure bridge technicality unless you have done it.
#14
Posted 2005-July-28, 13:53
2) Me thinks the Hog has not got out much in the past 30 years
3) Perhaps Bridge to the death might draw an audience? Bridge Battle at the Bellaigio? Caged bridge, 2 teams go in, only one walks out?
4) Perhaps if we bring back drinking and smoking at the table as in Poker it would make better tv? Side proposition bets? example: my partner will play for the drop not finesse, my partner will mess up Kickback responses, my partner will defend poorly, etc?
#15
Posted 2005-July-28, 14:41
mike777, on Jul 28 2005, 09:53 PM, said:
Latest Ladbroke odds: 2/13 against, so don't bet on it
Roland
#16
Posted 2005-July-28, 16:25
Elianna, on Jul 27 2005, 08:44 PM, said:
I couldn't believe the lack of awareness of their audience.
-Elianna
The words "were met by many eye-rolls" as Elianna reported are significant to me assuming that I interpreted her message correctly.
So, I am curious to know whether younger players, teens, juniors, (perhaps even a little older) were ever even consulted or polled about this "bridge is cool" idea to elicit their feedback, opinions, and/or suggestions. Assuming that the answer to the above is essentially "NO", I am curious about whether that feedback was ever provided to the decision-makers, and whether there was even a vehicle for doing so?
#17
Posted 2005-July-28, 17:01
Double !, on Jul 28 2005, 05:25 PM, said:
Elianna, on Jul 27 2005, 08:44 PM, said:
I couldn't believe the lack of awareness of their audience.
-Elianna
The words "were met by many eye-rolls" as Elianna reported are significant to me assuming that I interpreted her message correctly.
So, I am curious to know whether younger players, teens, juniors, (perhaps even a little older) were ever even consulted or polled about this "bridge is cool" idea to elicit their feedback, opinions, and/or suggestions. Assuming that the answer to the above is essentially "NO", I am curious about whether that feedback was ever provided to the decision-makers, and whether there was even a vehicle for doing so?
They hired a marketing firm to come up with the theme and name.
To assume no marketing research or incompetent research is not a reasonable assumption. That does not mean your assumption is incorrect but let's deal in facts and not guess work.
#18
Posted 2005-July-28, 17:28
1) Recent poll done over 3-4 months to 3,500 south calif. dues paying members. Only 51 bothered to take the poll.
2) From ACBL CEO 8-05. Satisfaction with our marketing efforts has increased from 82% to 86.3%. Well what the heck does that mean and why is it important? It could still mean our marketing stinks. Another case of statistics for the sake of statistics?
3) 17,500 ACBL games sanctioned online per month. Up more than 5,000 from a year ago. Does anyone know the f2f numbers?
#19
Posted 2005-July-29, 13:11
pbleighton, on Jul 28 2005, 07:27 AM, said:
Peter
Hey!
That quote is reserved for those of us who grew up in the 60s! If you qualify, then, "groovy" and "out-of-sight",......and, mowing "grass" was considered to be a moral sin.
#20
Posted 2005-July-29, 13:25
mike777, on Jul 28 2005, 06:28 PM, said:
1) Recent poll done over 3-4 months to 3,500 south calif. dues paying members. Only 51 bothered to take the poll.
Sorry, not a lot of numbers, and is this (Southern California) really a representative sample of the total population of targeted "consumers". (Come to think of it, who exactly are the targeted consumers in this survey and campaign?) Did they actually go out into schools including in the inner cities, and survey these populations? I work in an inner-city middle school in the northeast USA, and I have yet to meet any student or more than a few parents, and not that many adults in general who know what Bridge is, much less whether or not it is cool and could lead to a career in the NBA! I suspect that, to this potential consumer group, Bridge is something you have to pay a toll (or take a crowded subway) to cross.
OK, fine, refer this to the acbl education department.

Help
