Did you foresee this?
we don't have the systems
#1
Posted 2026-February-15, 16:43
Did you foresee this?
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#3
Posted 2026-February-15, 17:10
Without methods you need to do something extreme.
#4
Posted 2026-February-15, 17:17
a) strong 6+♣
b) 3xx6 strongish
c) 4xx5 GF
Opener bids 3♣ weak or 3♦ GF to ask
#5
Posted 2026-February-15, 17:29
jillybean, on 2026-February-15, 16:43, said:
Did you foresee this?
Tough. Very tough even with a toy.
Why? It is a bit too good for my toy
A bit too weak for strong 2C
Looks like the old fake reverse time, with 2D
At least I can find out if partner has five spades....
I hope, smile
Option 2 is open a strong 2C, I don't play it 100% GF
#6
Posted 2026-February-15, 18:57
5/24 AX and 1/12 BCD players got there, I'm not going to lose any sleep on this one.
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#7
Posted 2026-February-15, 20:41
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#8
Posted 2026-February-15, 20:46
A borderline hand ..
At MP you don't want to easily give on spades, just yet.
At imps easier just bid 3C. Natural and gf for me.
All around a deal that does not fit nicely into the structure..
#9
Posted 2026-February-15, 21:04
#10
Posted 2026-February-15, 21:13
This is the only hand we failed to communicate, the rest of the game went well.
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#11
Posted 2026-February-16, 00:54
1♣ - 1♥/♠ playing TW or not
2N - 3♦ GF asking
3♠ 3xx6
3♣ would be weak and is passable.
Now the choice of whether to bid 4♣ or 4♠.
I tend to go for the Major, but with an 8-card vs. 10 card fit its a tough call.
4♣ will set trumps and start off key card showing, while 4♠ passes the buck to partner. 5♣ is odd keycards with K♣ setting ♠ as trumps.
For reference 2♦ by opener is the more balanced reverse enabling a stop in 2M by responder when 5M 0~6 playing TW. Note: the reverse here will be 18+ as we break the transfer to 1N (15-17) playing TW.
#12
Posted 2026-February-16, 02:27
Bridge World would repeatedly put similar hands into its monthly bidding challenge and ask experts for their rebid using BW Standard. They would not have done this if there was a consensus amongst the experts, so I don't think most players should worry about it - just do whatever seems sensible and a number of experts will be supportive.
p
#13
Posted 2026-February-16, 03:15
2: Our multi is 6+ cards in second seat, so P then 2♠ over (our 4+ cards) 1♣ is this hand, suit reqs not as important by a passed hand.
3: at the club, any slam will score well, so I want to be in 6♣ which survives 4-1♠
#14
Posted 2026-February-16, 04:15
jillybean, on 2026-February-15, 21:13, said:
This is the only hand we failed to communicate, the rest of the game went well.
For me, the responding hand is a clearly worth committing to at least a small slam holding ♣KQ. What kind of hand is partner bidding 5♣ with missing the ♣KQ. Of course, what kind of partner would jump to 5♣ after a 1 level response?
#15
Posted 2026-February-16, 08:47
Cyberyeti, on 2026-February-16, 03:15, said:
2: Our multi is 6+ cards in second seat, so P then 2♠ over (our 4+ cards) 1♣ is this hand, suit reqs not as important by a passed hand.
3: at the club, any slam will score well, so I want to be in 6♣ which survives 4-1♠
North has a great hand if playing Multi 2M 5 card or Multi/Muierberg but disallowed at all levels here.
johnu, on 2026-February-16, 04:15, said:
Yes, in imp I may bid 6
Other than 5C how does opener proceed, other than a manufactured 2D reverse? This is why I ask the question and the hand is still known as the BW Death hand.
I will ask a few of the 6/36 pairs who got to 6 how they did it
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#16
Posted 2026-February-16, 09:09
#17
Posted 2026-February-16, 09:16
jillybean, on 2026-February-15, 16:43, said:
We did, as a consequence of last year's BB mixed pairs final
Now our Multirever can handle this and more.
jillybean, on 2026-February-15, 20:41, said:
P - 1♣
1♠ - 2♦(NAT or various strong hands)
2♥(positive) - 3♦ (5+♣, 3=♠)
3♠(FIT) - 4♣(CTL)
5♣(CTL,!♦,!♥,!even) - 6♠
P
West knows about the bombproof 9+ card clubs fit: I would stick to spades rather than raise clubs, but push to 5♣ to get the message across.
East knows we lose the first trick in hearts.
#18
Posted 2026-February-16, 09:36
the rest of it is too much system for me at the moment
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#19
Posted 2026-February-16, 09:37
pescetom, on 2026-February-16, 09:16, said:
Now our Multirever can handle this and more.
P - 1♣
1♠ - 2♦(NAT or various strong hands)
2♥(positive) - 3♦ (5+♣, 3=♠)
3♠(FIT) - 4♣(CTL)
5♣(CTL,!♦,!♥,!even) - 6♠
P
West knows about the bombproof 9+ card clubs fit: I would stick to spades rather than raise clubs, but push to 5♣ to get the message across.
East knows we lose the first trick in hearts.
ooops, South forgot to open 2H, North might compete to six.
#20
Posted 2026-February-16, 09:39
mike777, on 2026-February-16, 09:37, said:
A little too weak for South to open 2H, even for me
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)

Help
