BBO Discussion Forums: A new and better approach of bidding 5-5 Majors and 7-10 HCPS hand using Multi-2D - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A new and better approach of bidding 5-5 Majors and 7-10 HCPS hand using Multi-2D Include 5-5 Majors and 7-10 HCPS hand in the 2H bid.

#1 User is offline   hylins 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2020-September-06

Posted 2026-January-27, 01:58

Using Multi-2, a hand with 5-5 in Majors and 7-10 HCPS has several approaches to do the weak preempt bidding.
They are:
1) bid 2
2) bid 2NT
3) bid 2 to show a 5-card suit and a 2nd 5-card suit

However, each one of them has problems such as: too many meanings in one 2 bid, need to find a new bid for 20-21 balanced NT hand,
a response of 3 for the 2nd suit can be too high without 5-3 fit when the responder has 2 minor suits.

A new and better approach has been found to solve the problem. That is to use 2 to show a 5-card suit and a 2nd 5-card suit.
The advantage of this approach is finding 5-3 fit (Responder 5, Opener 3) becomes possible at 3-level if there is one.


In the case,

a) when the responder has 3+ cards , 2 will be bidding.

The opener will continue bidding as below:

2 2 (3+ cards . Ask for the 2nd 5-card suit and more)

2N 3-card (3550 or 3505, just in case the responder has 5-card )
3 5-card
3 5-card
3 5-card , Max
3 5-card , min


b) when the responder has less than 3 cards , 2N will be bidding.

The opener will continue bidding as below:

2 2N (less than 3 cards , Ask for the 2nd 5-card suit)

3 5-card
3 5-card
3 5-card



PS: The simplest version of my modified Multi-2 is

2: One 6-card or suit, or 20-21 NT
2: 55 in + Any suit ( or or )
2: 55 in + minor suit ( or )
2NT : 55 in minors ( + )

0

#2 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,633
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2026-January-27, 03:38

1. What does opener bid with 5+5 after 2-2NT?
2. What does responder do with a pattern like 2-2-4-5 or 2-1-5-5? Obviously if opener has a minor you want to play there (maybe even in game) but if opener has both majors you want to play in two of the right major? Is this even possible?

I know plenty of people who play 2 as "hearts and another" but their 2 bid is "to play if opener has both majors" and very non-forcing, which seems quite different from what you propose.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#3 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,934
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2026-January-27, 05:02

Canape overcalls (not takeout shape) work well for me aka The Overcall Structure. I've also modified this to include Weak2s. e.g. Over 1
2 Weak2 Major
2 45xx or x4x5 c.f. Frelling 2
2 4xx5
2N some preempt
0

#4 User is offline   hylins 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2020-September-06

Posted 2026-January-27, 06:33

View Postawm, on 2026-January-27, 03:38, said:

1. What does opener bid with 5+5 after 2-2NT?
2. What does responder do with a pattern like 2-2-4-5 or 2-1-5-5? Obviously if opener has a minor you want to play there (maybe even in game) but if opener has both majors you want to play in two of the right major? Is this even possible?

I know plenty of people who play 2 as "hearts and another" but their 2 bid is "to play if opener has both majors" and very non-forcing, which seems quite different from what you propose.



1. 3 to show 55 Majors, Responder picks better Major or any appropriate bid.
2. One should PASS if not having enough strength to bid or search for a game. Therefore, any bidding after partner's prempt bidding is F!, the old fashing way.
0

#5 User is offline   hylins 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2020-September-06

Posted 2026-January-27, 06:38

View Postmw64ahw, on 2026-January-27, 05:02, said:

Canape overcalls (not takeout shape) work well for me aka The Overcall Structure. I've also modified this to include Weak2s. e.g. Over 1
2 Weak2 Major
2 45xx or x4x5 c.f. Frelling 2
2 4xx5
2N some preempt


Personal preference is bidding with 55, not the aggresive 45.
0

#6 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,934
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2026-January-27, 06:47

View Posthylins, on 2026-January-27, 06:38, said:

Personal preference is bidding with 55, not the aggresive 45.

As an opening preempt/overcall an 'Ekren' style 2 overcall can be on as little as 44M with well defined follow-ups after 2N. Shape is much dependent on vulnerability though.

You could play a conservative Frelling approach for opening preempts. I.e
2 (5x)5x
2 55xx, x5x5
2 5xx5, 6xxx
You lose the weak 2
0

#7 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,633
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2026-January-27, 07:00

View Posthylins, on 2026-January-27, 06:33, said:

1. 3 to show 55 Majors, Responder picks better Major or any appropriate bid.
2. One should PASS if not having enough strength to bid or search for a game. Therefore, any bidding after partner's prempt bidding is F!, the old fashing way.


You will often have one of the following though:

1. A hand where you have about half the values and can make a game if there is a fit, but where you don't want to get too high otherwise. For example:

KQxxx Kx Axxx xx

If partner has five spades and five hearts, you can make game pretty easily (say JTxxx Axxxx x Qx). But if partner has hearts and a minor, you'd much rather play 2 than three of anything. A similar thing is possible (but less likely) in a minor suit.

2. A hand where you are quite short in hearts and have enough points that the opponents probably cannot make a game. For example:

KQx x KJxx Kxxxx

It would be rather silly to play 2 in a 5-1 fit when you have an eight or nine-card fit somewhere else. The points are pretty evenly divided and there's no big major fit, so the goal on these hands is to try to get a plus score; this is a lot more likely if you play in a strain where you have the majority of the trumps.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#8 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,934
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2026-January-27, 09:01

View Posthylins, on 2026-January-27, 01:58, said:

However, each one of them has problems such as: too many meanings in 2, need to find a new bid for 20-21 balanced NT hand...

You can put 20-21 through 2 using reverse 'birthright' with 2N becoming a preempt or 55 in the Majors. You can then use 3/3 to show relative strength in the Majors. 3 becomes 55 in the minors.
0

#9 User is offline   hylins 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2020-September-06

Posted 2026-January-27, 17:51

View Postmw64ahw, on 2026-January-27, 06:47, said:

As an opening preempt/overcall an 'Ekren' style 2 overcall can be on as little as 44M with well defined follow-ups after 2N. Shape is much dependent on vulnerability though.

You could play a conservative Frelling approach for opening preempts. I.e
2 (5x)5x
2 55xx, x5x5
2 5xx5, 6xxx
You lose the weak 2


I don't lose any bid. As a matter of fact, the simplest vesrion of my modfified Multi-2 is

2: One 6-card or suit, or 20-21 NT
2: 55 in + Any suit ( or or )
2: 55 in + minor suit ( or )
2NT : 55 in minors ( + )

The only hand sacrificed is the weak 6-card hand.
To get around, one can choose to bid PASS with 7-8 HCPs or strecth to bid 3 with 9-10 HCPs.
0

#10 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,934
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2026-January-27, 18:59

View Posthylins, on 2026-January-27, 17:51, said:

I don't lose any bid. As a matter of fact, the simplest vesrion of my modfified Multi-2 is

2: One 6-card or suit, or 20-21 NT
2: 55 in + Any suit ( or or )
2: 55 in + minor suit ( or )
2NT : 55 in minors ( + )

The only hand sacrificed is the weak 6-card hand.
To get around, one can choose to bid PASS with 7-8 HCPs or strecth to bid 3 with 9-10 HCPs.

You can put a Weak 2 through 2
0

#11 User is offline   hylins 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2020-September-06

Posted 2026-January-27, 21:01

View Postawm, on 2026-January-27, 07:00, said:

You will often have one of the following though:

1. A hand where you have about half the values and can make a game if there is a fit, but where you don't want to get too high otherwise. For example:

KQxxx Kx Axxx xx

If partner has five spades and five hearts, you can make game pretty easily (say JTxxx Axxxx x Qx). But if partner has hearts and a minor, you'd much rather play 2 than three of anything. A similar thing is possible (but less likely) in a minor suit.

2. A hand where you are quite short in hearts and have enough points that the opponents probably cannot make a game. For example:

KQx x KJxx Kxxxx

It would be rather silly to play 2 in a 5-1 fit when you have an eight or nine-card fit somewhere else. The points are pretty evenly divided and there's no big major fit, so the goal on these hands is to try to get a plus score; this is a lot more likely if you play in a strain where you have the majority of the trumps.



Please note that opening 2 is for 55 in + Any suit ( or or )

One thing I did not state clearly in the original posting is that the advantage of bidding a weak 55 Majors hand in 2,
It allows finding possible 5-3 or 3-5 fit at 3-level if there is any.
Actually, the 2 bid in my approach is very similar to the one in the normal weak 6-card opens 2 case.
In that case, the responder bids 2 to ask for a 5-3 fit. The opener will raise 3 if he has 3-card .

1) For your example of KQxxx Kx Axxx xx, you knew that there is only 5-2 fit in and the openner has a 2nd unknown 5-card suit.

A. First of all, if 2 is non-forcing, the things to know are:

a) There is no way to find the 5-5 or even 5-3 fit in .
b) Moreover, partner can have singleton or void in . Why play a 5-1 or 5-0 fit 2 contract instead of the known 5-2 fit 2 contract?

B. If you start asking the 2nd suit which will be 33% of time. When it happens, the things to know are:

a) What will your next bid be then?
b) What contract do you plan to play?
c) How do you know partner does not have 3-card when his 2nd suit is in minor? He can have 3505 or 3550.
d) My 2 approach provides an oppotunity to check if the opener has 3 or more cards first.


2) For the case of KQx x KJxx Kxxxx,

A. You know a 5-3 fit contract can be found once start asking instead of playing the 5-1 one. Common sense says not to PASS even if HCPs is not enough for a GAME.
B. MY question to this is what if the responder has 0 HCPS with the same holding shape of xxx x xxxx xxxxx, should he bid to further premmpt or not?
C. Using my approach to start asking for the 2nd 5-card suit, one will bid 2. An 8-card fit will be automatically found just like any other approach..
0

#12 User is offline   hylins 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2020-September-06

Posted 2026-January-28, 01:52

View Postmw64ahw, on 2026-January-27, 18:59, said:

You can put a Weak 2 through 2


You meant through the strong opening 2 bid?
Please show me how. Thanks,
0

#13 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,934
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2026-January-28, 02:20

View Posthylins, on 2026-January-28, 01:52, said:

You meant through the strong opening 2 bid?
Please show me how. Thanks,

Playing reverse 'birthright'
After 2-2
Pass Weak2
2 or balanced 20-21
.. Pass 5 bust
.. 2 relay (breaks of relay show a bust hand)
.... 2N balanced 20-21
...... Pass to play otherwise GF
.... Higher bids show 5+
2 5+ strong
2N balanced 22-24
3 5+
Higher bids show 5+ or (4441) if putting primary through a multi-2/2N

2 - 2 asks partner to show shape/strength opposite a Weak 2 (may have side suits) otherwise slam going.
0

#14 User is offline   AL78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,183
  • Joined: 2019-October-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE England
  • Interests:Bridge, hiking, cycling, gardening, weight training

Posted 2026-January-28, 03:12

Isn't this along the lines of Tartan Two's?

https://www.acblunit...mon/tartan2.htm

2 is either rockcrusher or a weak two in diamonds. 2 is whatever flavour of multi you like.
0

#15 User is offline   hylins 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2020-September-06

Posted 2026-January-28, 04:03

View PostAL78, on 2026-January-28, 03:12, said:

Isn't this along the lines of Tartan Two's?

https://www.acblunit...mon/tartan2.htm

2 is either rockcrusher or a weak two in diamonds. 2 is whatever flavour of multi you like.


In my approach, 55 + is included in 2 bidding.

While in Tartan Two's, 55 + is included in 2 bidding.

That is the key difference.
The responses to the 2 opening are different too.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users