BBO Discussion Forums: Responding to 2 clubs - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Responding to 2 clubs

#21 User is online   Tramticket 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,142
  • Joined: 2009-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent (Near London)

Posted 2025-November-14, 07:18

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-14, 07:01, said:

How solid is solid ? (same for us)


I can't pretend that our discussions have been that precise. But I would expect partner to be missing one of the top three honours.
0

#22 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,364
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-November-14, 08:02

View PostTramticket, on 2025-November-14, 07:18, said:

I can't pretend that our discussions have been that precise. But I would expect partner to be missing one of the top three honours.


AKQxxx is not solid as far as I'm concerned, AKQJxx is and AKQxxxx are, I like a holding that is good odds on opposite a small singleton, and at least has some play in a grand opposite a void.
0

#23 User is online   Tramticket 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,142
  • Joined: 2009-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent (Near London)

Posted 2025-November-14, 08:35

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-14, 08:02, said:

AKQxxx is not solid as far as I'm concerned, AKQJxx is and AKQxxxx are, I like a holding that is good odds on opposite a small singleton, and at least has some play in a grand opposite a void.


That is probably reasonable, but my working assumption as responder would be that we have a trump loser after a 2♣-2♦-2♠ start. Yes we might avoid one if partner does have the AKQxxx hand and trumps break 3-2, but I would work on the assumption that we have a trump loser.
0

#24 User is offline   mw64ahw 

  • nonconformist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,270
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2025-November-14, 08:40

A suit quality of 10 is solid (unlikely to lose more than 1 trick in the suit) and 9 is semi-solid. AKQxxx can be solid since you gain an extra point for AKQ although you will find differing opinions. For example, I would require 7 cards opening a gambling NT, but otherwise in the course of an auction would teat as solid
0

#25 User is offline   AL78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,213
  • Joined: 2019-October-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE England
  • Interests:Bridge, hiking, cycling, gardening, weight training

Posted 2025-November-14, 09:20

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-13, 15:46, said:

Showing what ?


0-7 HCP, no biddable suit, no spade support, assuming 2♠ can be a five card suit.
0

#26 User is online   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,588
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2025-November-14, 13:29

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-14, 03:32, said:

So what do you do with a 5314 or 5215 26 count or something like KJ5432, AKQ, A, AKJ ?


Are you serious?
The one time in 3 years I have this hand opposite a 2♥ red flag I bid 4♠ NF.
What happens happens, it is very unlikely to be a bottom.
Any 2♣ system has much bigger problems than this.
0

#27 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,364
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-November-14, 13:49

View Postpescetom, on 2025-November-14, 13:29, said:

Are you serious?
The one time in 3 years I have this hand opposite a 2♥ red flag I bid 4♠ NF.
What happens happens, it is very unlikely to be a bottom.
Any 2♣ system has much bigger problems than this.


You will almost certainly bid 2♣-2♦-4♠ on this one then, but a big hand with only 5 spades in an unbalanced hand is an issue for you.
0

#28 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,067
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2025-November-14, 13:59

After missing at least two small slams last Tuesday, in our discussion partner insisted that she will always have 22 HCP or more when she opens 2♣, balanced or not, and that therefore on the one hand where she opened 2♣ and I had eleven HCP I should have just bid slam after an unopposed 2♣-2♥-4♥, whereas I read her 4♥ bid as saying "we don't have a slam". I asked her what she would have meant if she'd bid 3♥ but I never got an answer.

I dunno, maybe she's right. 22+11 is 33 after all. But for me, there are hands with fewer than 22 HCP with which I would open 2♣, so blasting six after the above auction might well get us too high. No, she insists, she will never open 2♣ with fewer than 22 HCP. So next time we have this auction and I have 11 HCP I'm gonna blast 6, and the Devil take the hindmost.

Only one of the other NS's bid the slam, btw. <shrug>
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#29 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,364
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-November-14, 14:55

View PostTramticket, on 2025-November-14, 06:56, said:

Yes, I'm a little uneasy that I have shown as bust, whereas I actually have a few scattered values. But nevertheless I have nothing to cue bid, so raise to 4♠.

Note that the sequence 2♣-2♦-3♠ would imply a solid spade suit, so I am expecting partner to have a trump loser and they would therefore need to have no losers outside trumps to make slam a realistic option.


OK: so

2♣-2♦
2♠-3♣ (whether this is bust or clubs)
3♠-4♠
5♥-?

this was the problem my partner had with the small hand
0

#30 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,126
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2025-November-14, 19:59

View Postblackshoe, on 2025-November-14, 13:59, said:

I dunno, maybe she's right. 22+11 is 33 after all.

You can't play bridge like this. :angry:
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#31 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,697
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2025-November-14, 23:06

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-13, 14:09, said:



2♦ was simple negative for us with no 2♥ double negative available, but I guess you make the same bid if it's waiting, now what ?
I do not know your entire system but if negative means hcp <= 10 then a natural 3c seems the right way to go now. Our hand is slightly below average for a negative hand
(no controls) so there seems to be no reason to do anything heroic at this point. Playing 2d waiting a 3c bid is no longer natural (sort of like a double negative) and 2n would become the call that describes a hand with say 4+ balanced.
0

#32 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,364
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-November-15, 03:19

View Postgszes, on 2025-November-14, 23:06, said:

I do not know your entire system but if negative means hcp <= 10 then a natural 3c seems the right way to go now. Our hand is slightly below average for a negative hand
(no controls) so there seems to be no reason to do anything heroic at this point. Playing 2d waiting a 3c bid is no longer natural (sort of like a double negative) and 2n would become the call that describes a hand with say 4+ balanced.


Entire system, 2♦ negative (as was said in a subsequent post) ace and a K or K and a KQ but not 2Ks and a Q is a suit positive with a decent suit, bit more required for a minor pos,balanced 9+ is a 2N positive.

3♣ double neg, 2N clubs.
0

#33 User is online   Tramticket 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,142
  • Joined: 2009-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent (Near London)

Posted 2025-November-16, 10:50

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-14, 14:55, said:

OK: so

2♣-2♦
2♠-3♣ (whether this is bust or clubs)
3♠-4♠
5♥-?

this was the problem my partner had with the small hand


I have told partner three times that I am unsuitable for slam and they are still persisting? Not sure what 5H is? Last train? I have a little bit more than I promised, I bid slam now.
0

#34 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,364
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-November-16, 12:21

View PostTramticket, on 2025-November-16, 10:50, said:

I have told partner three times that I am unsuitable for slam and they are still persisting? Not sure what 5H is? Last train? I have a little bit more than I promised, I bid slam now.


In other auctions it would be "do you have the ♥Q", or "I have the ♥K or Q, bid the slam with the other one"

I felt partner should have bid slam, we both had an issue as I alerted partner's 2N as "not a bust, club suit" and partner quite obviously didn't have that.

I had AKQxxx, AKJ, A, KQx and with no club ruff and trumps 3-2 this rolled 12 tricks.

I did wonder if I should have bid 3♣ rather than 3♠ or just had a go at 6♣.
0

#35 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,340
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-November-16, 14:05

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-16, 12:21, said:

In other auctions it would be "do you have the ♥Q", or "I have the ♥K or Q, bid the slam with the other one"

I felt partner should have bid slam, we both had an issue as I alerted partner's 2N as "not a bust, club suit" and partner quite obviously didn't have that.

I had AKQxxx, AKJ, A, KQx and with no club ruff and trumps 3-2 this rolled 12 tricks.

I did wonder if I should have bid 3♣ rather than 3♠ or just had a go at 6♣.



I would try and be more sympathetic towards partner on this one. Very tough hand.
0

#36 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,364
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-November-16, 14:30

View Postmike777, on 2025-November-16, 14:05, said:

I would try and be more sympathetic towards partner on this one. Very tough hand.


Part of the reason I was unsympathetic was that he had intended to bid 2N as second negative, and heard me explain it as not a bust, so I suspect he signed off in 5♠ because he felt he'd overbid his hand (which he is not allowed to do), and if 6 was going off and ops called in the man, 5♠= would be adjusted to 6-1
0

#37 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,067
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2025-November-16, 15:29

View Postjillybean, on 2025-November-14, 19:59, said:

You can't play bridge like this. :angry:

Oh, I agree. However, if I want to keep playing, I either find a new partner (magic 8 ball says prospects are dim) or play by her rules. :-(
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#38 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,697
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2025-November-30, 20:56

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-15, 03:19, said:

Entire system, 2♦ negative (as was said in a subsequent post) ace and a K or K and a KQ but not 2Ks and a Q is a suit positive with a decent suit, bit more required for a minor pos,balanced 9+ is a 2N positive.

3♣ double neg, 2N clubs.

TY for info. 2n to show club length. Who knows, maybe opposite AKxxx x AK AKxxx we reach 6c even if our hand had zero hcp. Knowing p has club length might allow us to reach 3n with say AKQJT AKQ Axxx x once again even if our hand has zero hcp.
0

#39 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,697
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2025-November-30, 20:56

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-November-15, 03:19, said:

Entire system, 2♦ negative (as was said in a subsequent post) ace and a K or K and a KQ but not 2Ks and a Q is a suit positive with a decent suit, bit more required for a minor pos,balanced 9+ is a 2N positive.

3♣ double neg, 2N clubs.

TY for info. 2n to show club length. Who knows, maybe opposite AKxxx x AK AKxxx we reach 6c even if our hand had zero hcp. Knowing p has club length might allow us to reach 3n with say AKQJT AKQ Axxx x once again even if our hand has zero hcp.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users