fred, on Jul 14 2005, 09:12 AM, said:
I can't imagine why the tournament organizers would arrange to use the Baldi program for on site vugraph when they could have used BBO for that purpose (and, as a consequence, had an Internet vugraph show as well).
I don't know if you're familiar with the Baldi program. I happenned to be one of the operators on the last Euro Youth champs...
The Baldi's software is a complex suite that does a LOT of things aside from two-table broadcast to the auditorium... In fact, it does practically EVERYTHING, mainly scoring.
Apart from approx 4-5 vugraph operators (it is a very tedious task and I would not recommend trying to pull the show in 2

for the two rooms, there must be two more to enter the score strips into the system and verify them.
The system produces score sheets for each session, various types of ratings, Butlers etc.
The main VG auditorium contains three screens - one for video from open VG room, one for "digital" from open VG room (hands, bidding and play) and one with running results for all the matches.
BBO broadcast last year was realized via another 2(3) operators sitting in the auditorium and retyping what they saw into the BBO...
Unless I am missing out a lot of BBO capabilities, BBO could cover approximately 10% of what the Baldi's old software does. (Very old software. You cannot imagine what we went through when Baldi's colleagues by mistake failed to ship his main Novell server and we found that on a Saturday afternoon with the show starting Monday morning

)
On the other hand, to take a little revenge on the EBL - last year the whole staff was volunteers. We did everything for free (and our BF still ended in red numbers) - so if they use the lack of VG operators as an excuse, they should instead say that this year's event organizer has lack of commitment :-)