The_Hog, on Jul 8 2005, 11:04 PM, said:
The reason I made my last post is that I have spent a LOT of time discussing 2 suited overcalls with all my partners. We have got a very large number of good results from pairs who use 2 suited bids indiscriminently.
For what its worth, an analysis of our results over a period of at least 12 months showed the following:
1) It is a good idea to play specific 2 suited bids - hence we play modified Ghestem, and NO we don't forget it!
2) 2 suited overcalls are best played as either a hand that will genuinely win the contract or a hand that highly wants to encourage a sacrifice. Hence whether you use a 2SO depends on your hand type, the vul, and also what suit the opps opened. eg If pd is a passed hand and the opps open 1S, it is idiocy to bid 2NT on a weak 5/5 minors.
You are giving away far too much information. If opps get to a slam, they are likely to play the trump suit right.
This happened last Wed when an international in my seat at the other table opened 2NT in first seat nv on x x Kxxxx JT9xxx. Our pds bid to slam and made it by playing the Spades correctly. I passed throughout and our opps went 1 off by playing for S to be 2-2.
3) Whatever, the suit quality of both suits should be reasonable, hence the posted hand is a poor example of a 2SO in my opinion.
I find this interesting....guess I'm not as scientific. About the third time I made a so/so 2-suited bid and the opponents brushed it aside and bid game/slam/whatever and played me for 5/5 (Gee, how'd they know?), I said to myself, "This is dumb." Then I began to notice that sometimes it can be hard to get both your suits in with good hands when the oppents open and jam the bidding like with 1H-1S-4H (so now you have to bid clubs/diamonds) and a light bulb came on - If I bid Michael's with that hand I could then double 4H and partner could bid on when right and pass when right - what a concept!
So I came to the same basic conclusions - it's best to know which 2 suits I'm bidding and the bid is either strongly preemptive or a darned good hand. Either way, I want partner to bid the maximum his hand warrants - and oddly enough I've found the usage more frequent with good hands than bad.
WinstonM