Help
I think there is room for improvement.
We have seen that in the 3-card ending the simulation causes GIB to throw a random card, assuming declarer will make the rest anyway (And an improvement worth working on was to examine all distributions) and at the beginning I thought that this was also the problem here
But looking closer at the deal I found:
Making my win-loss calculation ducking with the ♣K in north might in the end give an extra trick worth 100, but might cost the contract losing 220.
But as there are only 2♣ out vacant places (or more correct the simulation) tells the bot to play for the drop, as the bot has forgotten the earlier winning finesse.
So lesson learned: If the bot finesse your or your partner for a King and probably will have to repeat the finesse, then both players should discard the suit if possible getting down to only Kx as that probably will cause the Bot to play for the drop.
I remember have seen other bords, where the player asked why the bot did not repeat the finesse, and the above is probably the reason