BBO Discussion Forums: Finesse works once, refuse it next trick - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Finesse works once, refuse it next trick

#1 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,229
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2022-August-01, 17:41

if you are not going to repeat the finesse it makes sense to play Ace and another trump to
avoid a ruff
thank pilowsky for diagram
Sarcasm is a state of mind
0

#2 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,730
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-August-01, 18:24

The diagram shows you in South. Are you GIB :o

OK, I assume you were disconnected, and a basic GIB took over. GIB doesn't make assumptions about what a play does or doesn't show; finessing is the best at trick one, but on the next trick it considers East ducking from Kx just as likely as anything else.

Matt Ginsberg's original paper specified that it should calculate conditional probabilities of whether opponents have certain cards based on whether a certain play earlier on would have been an error, to handle situations like this. But apparently it made the program way too slow, and it was taken out (on reflection, not too surprisingly; if GIB often struggles to deal any hands that match a bidding sequence, and believes you way too much when you do something a tiny bit unusual, imagine if you restrict it further by removing a whole heap every time someone plays a non-optimal card..)
I have nothing worth contributing, bye
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users