Help
Teams. 8 board match converted to VPs
Against a pair of notorious overbidders you have to find the winning lead. I didn't
Page 1 of 1
Another Lead
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,420
- Joined: 2007-October-15
Posted 2021-January-20, 05:30
Teams. 8 board match converted to VPs
Against a pair of notorious overbidders you have to find the winning lead. I didn't
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 974
- Joined: 2017-August-10
- Gender:Male
Posted 2021-January-20, 06:34
Small ♠. Opps could X-ruff to 13 tricks? Lead takes two tricks from them. A guess.
#3
- 5-level belongs to me
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,128
- Joined: 2004-August-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glasgow Scotland
- Interests:Poems Computers
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,849
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2021-January-20, 19:36
I lead the heart 9. I’m hoping for a layout such as
He rises with the Ace and the hand looks simple with reasonable pointed suit breaks. AK of diamonds, ruff diamond high. Spade to the 10, ruff diamond high. Lead the spade 8, I cover and he’s toast. If he comes back to the 7, he can’t get back to dummy to pull my last trump. This line makes 7S on all 4-2/3-3 diamonds so long as trump are not 4-0. Surely far better than ducking the heart 9 at trick 1.
If I lead a spade instead, he wins cheaply in hand and eventually has a dummy entry in hearts.
The usual lead against these contracts is the passive trump, but here we have a surprise for declarer. A heart lead forces him to commit at trick one and may also, as here, attack communication.
He rises with the Ace and the hand looks simple with reasonable pointed suit breaks. AK of diamonds, ruff diamond high. Spade to the 10, ruff diamond high. Lead the spade 8, I cover and he’s toast. If he comes back to the 7, he can’t get back to dummy to pull my last trump. This line makes 7S on all 4-2/3-3 diamonds so long as trump are not 4-0. Surely far better than ducking the heart 9 at trick 1.
If I lead a spade instead, he wins cheaply in hand and eventually has a dummy entry in hearts.
The usual lead against these contracts is the passive trump, but here we have a surprise for declarer. A heart lead forces him to commit at trick one and may also, as here, attack communication.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,655
- Joined: 2011-February-12
Posted 2021-January-21, 09:25
low heart
If rho has the 4 controls there is just no way we are ever going to set this BUT if lho has the 4 controls they are heavy favorites to hold the heart ace and a low heart lead (in conjunction with our nasty surprise 4 spades) might be just enough to set them. I am picturing something like AKQ8 AJx AKxxx x opposite JTxxx Q xx AQxxx. Would you take the finesse at trick 1? I am having trouble picturing hands where declarer can go wrong knowing about the poor trump split at trick 1 where they would have succeeded w/o the trump lead.
If rho has the 4 controls there is just no way we are ever going to set this BUT if lho has the 4 controls they are heavy favorites to hold the heart ace and a low heart lead (in conjunction with our nasty surprise 4 spades) might be just enough to set them. I am picturing something like AKQ8 AJx AKxxx x opposite JTxxx Q xx AQxxx. Would you take the finesse at trick 1? I am having trouble picturing hands where declarer can go wrong knowing about the poor trump split at trick 1 where they would have succeeded w/o the trump lead.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,420
- Joined: 2007-October-15
Posted 2021-January-21, 11:17
I also had some trouble finding a layout where declarer could go off. Eventually I decided that the Merrimac of the K♥ was the right lead, but I could not lead it, as I would be accused of self-kibitzing if it was right, and ridiculed if it was wrong. I just took my -2210 with a low spade lead. The full layout:
Perhaps I should have stuck to my instincts, led the K♥, and pleaded guilty to reduce the ban to 2 years.
Perhaps I should have stuck to my instincts, led the K♥, and pleaded guilty to reduce the ban to 2 years.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,849
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2021-January-21, 18:03
lamford, on 2021-January-21, 11:17, said:
I also had some trouble finding a layout where declarer could go off. Eventually I decided that the Merrimac of the K♥ was the right lead, but I could not lead it, as I would be accused of self-kibitzing if it was right, and ridiculed if it was wrong. I just took my -2210 with a low spade lead. The full layout:
Perhaps I should have stuck to my instincts, led the K♥, and pleaded guilty to reduce the ban to 2 years.
Perhaps I should have stuck to my instincts, led the K♥, and pleaded guilty to reduce the ban to 2 years.
You said the opps were aggressive. You didn’t say they didn’t have any clue about bidding.
4C with only 3 trump, and all top honours, is silly. One could be cold for 6D and have trouble making 4S, if partner has a hand such as xxxx KQx Qxx xxx.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,920
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2021-January-21, 18:19
lamford, on 2021-January-21, 11:17, said:
I also had some trouble finding a layout where declarer could go off. Eventually I decided that the Merrimac of the K♥ was the right lead, but I could not lead it, as I would be accused of self-kibitzing if it was right, and ridiculed if it was wrong. I just took my -2210 with a low spade lead. The full layout:
Perhaps I should have stuck to my instincts, led the K♥, and pleaded guilty to reduce the ban to 2 years.
Perhaps I should have stuck to my instincts, led the K♥, and pleaded guilty to reduce the ban to 2 years.
Maybe you should lead a small heart and call for a ban if opps get this right
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,420
- Joined: 2007-October-15
Posted 2021-January-22, 04:31
mikeh, on 2021-January-21, 18:03, said:
You said the opps were aggressive. You didn’t say they didn’t have any clue about bidding.
4C with only 3 trump, and all top honours, is silly. One could be cold for 6D and have trouble making 4S, if partner has a hand such as xxxx KQx Qxx xxx.
4C with only 3 trump, and all top honours, is silly. One could be cold for 6D and have trouble making 4S, if partner has a hand such as xxxx KQx Qxx xxx.
A lot of people that don't play "SAD" (a Scoltock Adjunct, where 2H is artificial, either a reverse or hands such as 6+ diamonds and 3 spades, FG) have difficulty with the North hand. If 4C meant the opponents needed to find a Merrimac to beat grand, then it is not that clueless.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
Page 1 of 1
++++++++++++++++++
Agree with LBengtsson. I rank
1. ♠3 Stand-out lead, especially if opponents overbid.
2. ♣T Perhaps declarer hopes dummy is void.
3. ♥4 Perhaps opps are missing 2 aces
4. ♦Q Giving up