Here is the full hand. The auction was:
1
♣ - 1
♠
1N - 3
♥ *)
4
♥ - pass
*) explained as 5-5 in the majors.
West led
♦J ducked to East's king. At the table East switched to a spade, and the contract was now cold. Declarer went up with the ace, unblocked
♦Q, cashed
♥A and entered dummy with a trump to the king.
His losing club disappeared on dummy's
♦A. From then on the defence could only get one trick in each major (
♥Q and
♠K).
Should East have known that he must try to cash
♣A at trick 2? It doesn't look appealing with AQ sitting over dummy's KJ, does it, but it is still right to lead the ace - even if declarer is void.
After trick 1 East knows that South has
♦Q. It doesn't cost to lead
♣A even if declarer is void. In that case he has no more losers in the minors. East must hope that South is dealt a 5-5-2-1 shape, and that partner can come to two tricks in the majors.
As you see on the full layout, this is exactly what will happen after
♣A stands up. West has two natural tricks in the major suits, and the contract must go one down. Not an easy hand if you are a beginner/intermediate.
Counting is the key. Declarer is known to have 5-5 in the majors, and he must have at least two diamonds headed by the queen, since he played low from dummy at trick 1. Why the queen you may ask. Because your partner led the jack, and leading a jack denies the queen if you play standard leads.
Your partner found a good lead, and declarer could not have made his contract on accurate defence.
Well done to you who got it right, hidden text or not. You seem to be good defenders!
Roland
South: 4H
Lead: DJ