Seemingly simple but we disagreed Your response
#1
Posted 2005-June-06, 04:29
Oct 2006: Mission impossible
Soon: Mission illegal
#2
Posted 2005-June-06, 04:32
Roland
#5
Posted 2005-June-06, 06:12
Roland
#6
Posted 2005-June-06, 06:31
2H, if the auction is, as Gerben suggested.
This hand is not worth a cue raise, the only
question is, if you should bid 2C instead of 2H,
assuming 2C is not forcing merely constructive.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-06, 08:07
#8
Posted 2005-June-06, 08:16
#9
Posted 2005-June-06, 09:19
The sequence
1? - 1??
1?? - 1other
shows a weak hand with 6 clubs and two top honors. Singleton in diamonds. Pd can now place the contract or relay bidding 2something. Over 2something I'd bid 3?! showing interest in what's happening.
#10
Posted 2005-June-06, 11:02
But I suppose that it is Matchpoints.
#12
Posted 2005-June-16, 06:01
Oct 2006: Mission impossible
Soon: Mission illegal
#14
Posted 2005-June-16, 09:14
Fluffy, on Jun 16 2005, 10:56 AM, said:
It was a mental excerise to see if you could read the mind of the poster.. .the one clue is this (in bold) from the original post....
Quote
Since unassuming cue-bid was mentioned, the opponent must have bid something, and partner must have made an overcall and the next hand passed.
This means, in all likelyhood, West opened a red suit, and partner overcalled in a major at the one level. So the question is do you raise partners major to the two level, or cue-bid to show a little something. The people who choose to guess, chose an opoening bid of 1♦ and a 1♥ overcall (surely 1♥ instead of 1 spade because of the options in the poll, and surely 1♦. else 2♦ here really makes no sense).
Ben
#15
Posted 2005-June-16, 09:28
#16
Posted 2005-June-16, 15:48

Help
