BBO Discussion Forums: Weak 6-5 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Weak 6-5

Poll: Weak 6-5 (18 member(s) have cast votes)

Are You Worth Another Bid?

  1. Yes (5 votes [27.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.78%

  2. No (13 votes [72.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 72.22%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   Joe_Old 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 179
  • Joined: 2016-December-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York, USA

Posted 2020-September-20, 11:46

View Postpilowsky, on 2020-September-20, 05:24, said:

Here's how I see it: I think West is the one that was a bit verschmickled.

1NT: 14-18 balanced - this seems to be the modern 1NT opening.
2♥: Cappelletti ♥ and a minor

Double of ♥: transfer to ♠

2♠: Aha! I've got ♠
3♣: the suit I'd prefer to ♠ since I was a bit light for my 1NT anyway

3♦: the minor I mentioned earlier.
3♠: West must have misunderstood what was happening.
5♦: Oh boy this going to be great.

Pass: I wish West would shut up.

Double: Gotcha

Pass: Hmmm
Pass: WTF
Pass: should I redouble...nah.





No.

1NT - "I have HCPs and a suit, but I don't like them much. Give me some direction partner."

2♥ - ♥ and a minor.

X - transfer to ♠. Alternatively might be, "I have other 2 suits" because West infers that South's minor is ♦. In any case, value showing. In light of West's next bid, probably not a game force (yet).

2♠ - "I know you don't have ♠ partner. I'm hoping that my hand is useful, and this may be the last chance I have to find out."

3♣ - "I have 5+ ♣."

3♦ - "This is my minor." Cooperative. Probably also infers nothing useful in ♣.

3♠ - 100% forcing to game with good ♣ support. ♠ stopper, if East wants to play 3NT, but expresses doubt about the red suits. No worry about right siding the contract, since East already bid ♣ and 1NT.

5♦ - "Maybe partner can cross ruff to glory. In any case a good sacrifice."

Pass - Forcing Pass. Partner must X or bid. West has already made a game forcing bid and East does not have a clear action, particularly since West has taken 6♣ out of the picture by expressing doubt about the red suits.

Pass - "I respect partner's action and have nothing to add."

X - "I don't have a strong enough suit to bid 5♠ (suppose West had AQJTxx instead), 5NT is too speculative, and I don't have a red suit void to justify a 6♣ bid."
0

#22 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2020-September-20, 12:43

View Postnige1, on 2020-September-18, 17:53, said:

I guess ..
  • West's double = NEG "Values", willing to contest the partscore.
  • North's 2♠ = NAT Short ♥, 5+ ♠.
  • East's 3♣ = NAT Probably 6+ ♣s.

Hence, over East's 3♣, I rank
  • 3♦ = NAT "Come alive"? or "Death Wish III"? It seems "Into the Valley of Death" is the judgement of BBO experts
  • Pass = NAT but timid: especially as it's common to overcall with 4-5 shapes, on BBO.

FelicityR "Thank you for your replies. I wanted to establish the thinking behind the 3♦ bid. It turned out well as it resulted in a double game swing and 16 IMPs for her team ... West led the ♣A and 5♦X made. Now that the hands and bidding have been given, I'm still interested how you view this."


++++++++++++++++++++
IMO, the auction is reasonable by both sides. South took a risk and got lucky :) It's a bidders' game :)

0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users