BBO Discussion Forums: Repost: How dangerous is it? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Repost: How dangerous is it? I am dumb. Partner isn't a passed hand.

#1 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,289
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2005-June-06, 12:45

Scoring: IMP

I am dumb; I didn't notice the first post had partner as a passed hand. He is not. The auction:
1C-P-1H-P
2H-?

Does this alter your choices?

Again, sorry for the goof.

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

#2 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,197
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-06, 13:16

I still bid 2s the first time and get this hand off my chest. Why pass, I do not want to play the hand in some other suit do I?
0

#3 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,289
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2005-June-06, 13:53

My thinking on this type hand, and it could be totally wrong, is that on this auction and looking at my hand it is a dead certainty that partner will not have the kind of hand to balance after 1C-P-1H-P-2H-P-P-?

IMO, the risk of going off -800 or -1100 is A) not all that great, and worth the slight risk. Obviously, risking -800 verses -110/-140 is suicidal on one board, but my thinking is that this one risk covers many, many boards, and the "hidden" losses of 4-6 imps by not competing over time will make aggressive action pay in the long run.

I know for me when I have an 8 or 9 card fit I never seem to get rich doubling the opponents at the 2-level , so I would not expect to be doubled more than 5% of the time. Out of 100 hands, that leaves 95 hands where my action may either push them 1 higher where we can go plus or find a partscore of our own and go plus. We lose on average 12 imps 5 times, but even if our bid only works out as a postive 20% of the rest of the time, that is 19 hands where we go plus. With an average expected win of 5 imps on these hands, we have a positive imp position of +95 verses losses of -60 for a net gain of +35 imps. If the assumption is correct that 5% of the time or less we lose on average 800, it only requires 15% of the remaining hands to show a postive result to break even, assuming an average gain of 5 imps.

Again, it is my thinking that I question; am I totally skewed in this regard; am I on the right lines but too aggressive; or is this pretty close to right?

With all the bright minds on the Forum, I respect each and every opinion and thank you all in advance for any your input.

WinstonM
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

#4 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-June-06, 15:05

still bid 1S the first time and 2S now
0

#5 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2005-June-06, 18:05

i'd bid 2s with fear on my first opportunity, and forever shut up
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#6 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2005-June-07, 03:52

Hum.. LHO hasn't passed initially, so he will know whether to bid game or not. If we want to try for a save, now is the time. 3 seems fair. Hopefully pard will understand we have a long weak suit because we didn't overcall 1st round.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users