Stansby//Rosenberg table Woman's final
#1
Posted 2005-June-09, 22:27
P=1C=1S=1NT
X........
What is standard top class understanding?
When, if ever, is x an alert in this position?
If possible please site specific rules.
Is it a fair statement that in the ACBL the rules for alerting doubles are FUZZY?
#2
Posted 2005-June-10, 01:55
And I think it's a good thing !
Alain
#3
Posted 2005-June-10, 02:49
I don't know about "top class" understanding but mine is that it is take out with ♠ tolerance.
#4
Posted 2005-June-10, 02:55
#5
Posted 2005-June-10, 03:20
I totally agree with you and playing with screens I also alert it !
But without screens, is it alertable in your countries ?
Alain
#6
Posted 2005-June-10, 03:28
joker_gib, on Jun 10 2005, 07:55 AM, said:
And I think it's a good thing !
Alain
Most of the time this is good.
Except if you DBL and opps don't expect it to be conventional.
f.i.:
(1NT)-DBL
You play this double as showing 5 card m and 4 card M.
You always played this to show 15-17 HCP, as everybody in your club does. This is what your opps expect and they will not ask.
(You could alert anyway, but partner tends to forget new agreements. So if he has the 15-17HCP hand then alerting would give even bigger issues.)
#7
Posted 2005-June-10, 03:37
Especially in a situation like 1NT - X where a lot of meanings exist !
Alain
#8
Posted 2005-June-10, 03:57
I think it is fairly standard to play this as a penalty double.
By the way "take-out with tolerance for spades" and "penalties" are actually not so far removed from each other in terms of the actual hand you would double on. Both look like maximum pass values, fairly balanced. I'm more likely to have a singleton spade and club cards than you, but that's all.
#9
Posted 2005-June-10, 03:58
joker_gib, on Jun 10 2005, 02:55 AM, said:
And I think it's a good thing !
Alain
This just means that every time someone doubles, I have to ask what it means.
Why is that a good thing? Doesn't it just slow the game down?
#10
Posted 2005-June-10, 03:58
In the Netherlands, you are not allowed to alert doubles, but we still alert redoubles and passes with exotic meanings. In Germany, passes and redoubles are non-alertable, too.
As for the double in this topic, I agree with Gerben and others. I've seen it used as psyche-exposing with an unpassed hand, but even then I think the primary meaning would be take-out with spade tollerance.
#11
Posted 2005-June-10, 04:12
I've encountered:
1X (dbl) pass = 10+ for penalties
1X (p) 1Y (dbl) pass = Rosenkrantz: Hx support, redouble denying such
You are not allowed to alert this so this is just hiding your secret agreements. Of course redouble gets asked but not pass.
Alerting doubles: For many pairs this seems to help them more than the opponents, which is why they said "don't alert doubles". In complex situations you"ll get handwaving anyway and feel sorry you asked in the first place. A good rule might be "do not alert a double in the spectrum from penalty to takeout (negative, maximal, action, reopening, etc.), but alert conventional doubles"
About the psyche-exposing double in this particular situation, no thanks. If they have psyched 1NTx is not going to be the end of it. Meanwhile I'll bid my hand, if they don't bid theirs that's their problem.
#12
Posted 2005-June-10, 08:23
Btw, in Germany all of pass, double, redouble and any bid higher than 3NT may never be alerted, too. I don't like the rule myself. Do you want to ask everytime your partners weak 2♠ got doubled? Or instead find out it showed 16-18 balanced with spades stopper AFTER you raised? (This occurred to me at the table, I don't think opponents had bad intentions exploiting the rules.)
Arend
#13
Posted 2005-June-10, 09:20
1♦ Dbl Pass(no alert) = what a rdbl is for others
is an example
#14
Posted 2005-June-10, 10:36
cherdano, on Jun 10 2005, 09:23 AM, said:
Rosenberg had 5H and 2 spades.
Stansby knew it was responsive and bid 2h on her 3 card h suit.
2H was also played at other table.
At this table in middle of hand much confusion reigned as players were pulled away for a chat.
R/S said they were told before match to not alert
Director ruled alert in future but no damage here, play on.
#15
Posted 2005-June-11, 07:18

Help
