BBO Discussion Forums: A Hand from Swiss Teams in Switzerland - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A Hand from Swiss Teams in Switzerland

Poll: A Hand from Swiss Teams in Switzerland (15 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you have bid differently eariier?

  1. I would have opened 1H (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  2. I would have opened 2D multi (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. I would have passed partner's 2H (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. I would have bid 3H over partner's 2H (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. I would have bid 4H over partner's 2H (10 votes [62.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 62.50%

  6. I disagree with the bids so far in some other way (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  7. I agree with the auction so far (3 votes [18.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.75%

Given the bidding so far, what now?

  1. 3H (5 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  2. 4H (9 votes [60.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 60.00%

  3. Something else (1 votes [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,306
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2020-February-02, 05:52

This is not a UI problem. I bid 3H and partner passed, then put down:

QT
ATx
KQxxxx
Kx

LHO lead his singleton heart queen and eleven tricks were easy from there. At the other table the world class ppponents opened 1H on my hand and had no trouble reaching and making 4H, for a big loss of IMPs to my side!

I thought I had a close decision between 4H and inviting (did not really consider opening 1H in 2/1 but obviously this is some pairs’ style).
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#22 User is offline   apollo1201 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,081
  • Joined: 2014-June-01

Posted 2020-February-02, 10:38

View Postawm, on 2020-February-02, 05:52, said:

This is not a UI problem. I bid 3H and partner passed, then put down:

QT
ATx
KQxxxx
Kx



Thanks for posting the hand and play!

This hand illustrates (I think) what I meant when I wrote partner is allowed to bid 4 over 3 with good stuff on top of his D. The QT in S, a CK that looks well positioned, and good quality trumps would convince me to bid on.
0

#23 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2020-February-02, 12:14




awm 'This is not a UI problem. I bid 3H and partner passed,
LHO lead his singleton heart queen and eleven tricks were easy from there. At the other table the world class ppponents opened 1H on my hand and had no trouble reaching and making 4H, for a big loss of IMPs to my side!
I thought I had a close decision between 4H and inviting (did not really consider opening 1H in 2/1 but obviously this is some pairs' style).'
++++++++++++++++++++++

Several commentators chose to rebid 3♥,.
Presumably, partner believed his previous 3♦ to be constructive (I sympathise).
Otherwise, he now seems to be worth 4♥, especially at imps, . :(

Guthrie.tech
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users