BBO Discussion Forums: GIB supports with singleton - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

GIB supports with singleton

#1 User is offline   sacto123 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 2013-June-28

Posted 2019-February-22, 17:47

My link

The note for GIB's 3S cue bid said "3+ Hearts,12+ HCP, 13+ Points; forcing
GIB had the points but was short a couple of hearts.
5 Hearts made, but that's not the point.
0

#2 User is online   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,754
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2019-February-22, 23:27

View Postsacto123, on 2019-February-22, 17:47, said:

5 Hearts made, but that's not the point.

Perhaps it is. Basic GIB passes; none of the options it has are a reasonable description of its hand. If advanced GIB calculates that lying about its hand will lead to a better contract.. it's hard to argue definitively in that case the simulation was wrong.
0

#3 User is offline   sacto123 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 2013-June-28

Posted 2019-February-23, 22:42

View Postsmerriman, on 2019-February-22, 23:27, said:

Perhaps it is. Basic GIB passes; none of the options it has are a reasonable description of its hand. If advanced GIB calculates that lying about its hand will lead to a better contract.. it's hard to argue definitively in that case the simulation was wrong.

Excellent point. In GIB's seat I would surely have raised to game, trusting partner to have a strong 6 bagger. GIB was just being a good partner, regardless of the description of the bid
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users