BBO Discussion Forums: Who should double? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Who should double?

#21 User is offline   Tramticket 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,072
  • Joined: 2009-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent (Near London)

Posted 2019-February-23, 04:42

View Postmikeh, on 2019-February-22, 14:43, said:

As it happens, due to the opps using, badly, a bad method, double might have hit a home run. I'm assuming that opener would bid 3H and that west's double would not be responsive


This is an interesting question! We play 1H, Dbl, 2H, Dbl, and 1H, Dbl, 3H, Dbl, as responsive because opponents have found a fit and we don't look for low level penalty doubles when opps have a fit. An auction such as 1H, Pass, 1NT, Dbl, 2H, Dbl would be penalties as there is no indiction that opps have a fit.

But I have never considered 2H, Pass, 2NT, Dbl, 3H, Dbl where there may be a fit I think it should be penalty, but will ask partner next time we meet up!
0

#22 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2019-February-25, 03:07

Why wouldn't it be responsive?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users