BBO Discussion Forums: 2 hands from yesterday - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 hands from yesterday

#21 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,075
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-April-18, 02:05

Hand 1)
- Double, since there is no real alternative.
- No, pass.
Partner could be stretching. I dont mind losing 500, on
a 50% slam, maybe the actual slam is a little bit better,
but I dont care, but I mind losing 600, when the other
table is only in game

Hand2)
- 3H

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#22 User is offline   ochinko 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 647
  • Joined: 2004-May-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Cooking

Posted 2005-April-18, 06:21

I prefer separate threads for separate hands. Answers in a single thread are longer, less thorough, and often only half interesting.

It is understandable that people don't want to create many new topics, but I believe it would be more convenient for the readers. Make them Hand 1/4, 2/4, etc.

Petko
0

#23 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2005-April-19, 02:41

Chamaco, on Apr 16 2005, 05:18 AM, said:

Hand 1:
Scoring: IMP


E......S......W......N
2H...Dbl....4H.....4S
all pass

2H was a natural weak 2.

1) Do you agree with the first t/o double ?
2) Should south make a move towards slam ?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. I suppose so.
2. No.

The fact you've asked the question implies 12 tricks made. But slam isn't huge. All the bidding going on implies things may not break very well, and they don't have to lead a heart at trick 1. To make slam, you need:

a) spades 3-2
;) clubs and diamonds not 5-1 (the hand with the likely singleton and non-trump ace is on lead)
c) a twelfth trick from somewhere. Though I admit once a) and :) are specified, if opener has 6 hearts you know must have one of the minors breaking. But could the 2H bidder have, say?

10x
K109xx
xx
J109x

now try 6S on a club lead...
0

#24 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,309
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2005-April-19, 17:44

It seems like double is nearly unanimous as a first bid on hand one. What is partner supposed to bid over 4 with:

Axxx
xx
Qxxx
Kxx

Some sort of responsive double? If everyone really plays responsive doubles this high I suppose I can accept that, although I personally think a LOT is lost by not having the option to penalize 4 here.

But if in fact partner would bid 4, doesn't this put you in something of a bind? 5 is obviously excellent, but I honestly don't like my chances at 4 in the 4-2 fit...
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users