BBO Discussion Forums: Hoping the basic meanings of basic bidding would be correct in " Video Bridge" - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Hoping the basic meanings of basic bidding would be correct in " Video Bridge"

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2016-November-17, 01:02



This hand is from " Video Bridge" in Solitaire.
4♦ says " 3+♥,22+TPs".
Its definition obviously denied cuebid / limited raise, actually, would its cuebid 4♦ need 22+TPs? Never.
22+TPs only misled its partner, what else?
I would think it is not reasonable.
Hoping the basic meanings of basic bidding would be correct in " Video Bridge", even we know it is basic Gib.
This is my suggestion.
0

#2 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2016-November-17, 01:05

P.S.
I think the 5♠ definition would be " Correct back - 3/4 key cards - 3+♥, cuebid ♠Ace."
0

#3 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2016-November-18, 20:58

5S will never be defined. 4D should probably be like 6 points lower range. It is probably following some general rule, not one for the specific auction.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users