What now? What do you bid and why?
Who do you trust? How much worse could it be?
#1
Posted 2005-March-09, 19:28
What now? What do you bid and why?
#2
Posted 2005-March-09, 19:34
Obviously, this wouldn't be a problem if 6♥ would be the correct bid. Probably 6♠ or even pass is best...
#3
Posted 2005-March-09, 20:00
The question is: What do you bid - six hearts or SEVEN hearts?
#4
Posted 2005-March-09, 20:11
#5
Posted 2005-March-09, 20:16
Stephen Tu, on Mar 10 2005, 02:11 AM, said:
So how should he bid AKQJx AQJT9 - AKQ? A direct 6♦, maybe? (I agree with 6♥, btw.)
Arend
#6
Posted 2005-March-09, 20:20
But without some data on your bidding system and style it's hard to say whats going on.
Trust your Partner or get another new one
I can imagine 3 different meanings of 4♦:
1) Your partner is short in ♦ and STRONG, at least stronger than takeout.
2) Your partner is 5-5 in the majors, you should pick one.
3) Your partner is trying to uncover a psyche by west.
4) Someone missclicked, and everything we suggest is *censored*.
If he meant 1) he can dbl 5♦ to get something like 800 to 1100, since you have nothing. I don't think 6♦ is a good follow up bid.
If he meant 2), he can hardly expect you to understand 6♦ he should bid one of his 5 card suit at 5 level.
If he meant 3) he can dbl 5♦ for a massacre and if west runs, you know it was a psyche.
That leaves 1) and 4) as options.
So i think your partner holds 544 (or maybe 553) and a ♦ void with lots of hcps.
So i can't resit to bid 7♦ and let partner choose his favorite major.
#7
Posted 2005-March-09, 21:06
I'll bet they sac anyway.
#8
Posted 2005-March-10, 04:45
#9
Posted 2005-March-10, 07:58
#11
Posted 2005-March-10, 10:50
cherdano, on Mar 9 2005, 09:16 PM, said:
Stephen Tu, on Mar 10 2005, 02:11 AM, said:
So how should he bid AKQJx AQJT9 - AKQ? A direct 6♦, maybe? (I agree with 6♥, btw.)
Arend
My partner's tend not to have such good hands Arend.
- hrothgar
#12
Posted 2005-March-10, 11:18
If we won't bid 7H with this hand, what will it take?
By the way this is very much like a hand that S. J. Simon has in Why You Lose At Bridge he regards 7H as correct if you trust your partner.
#13
Posted 2005-March-10, 12:14
Hannie, on Mar 10 2005, 04:50 PM, said:
cherdano, on Mar 9 2005, 09:16 PM, said:
Arend
My partner's tend not to have such good hands Arend.
Now you know why they usually don't bid 6♦ over 3♦.
Arend
#14
Posted 2005-March-10, 16:45
Quote
If we won't bid 7H with this hand, what will it take?
It's not much of gamble that you'll fit a major. When the opponents have big fit, you're guaranteed to have a fit. It'll be in a major the vast majority of the time. Occasionally your fit is clubs but if partner has the suit solidity to justify bidding this way, 7 cd fits will often be enough.
I'd bid 7 with 2 covers, definitely not 1.
If partner has the 2 loser hand, how can he expect you to raise to slam with xxx xxx xxx Qxxx? He has to bid what he thinks he can make. There's no sensible bid for him after 5d other than 6d with the 5-5-0-3 monster. He'll be dealt the 2 loser hand many times more often than the 1 loser hand just on probability. If he has to wait until he has only 1 loser to bid 6, then he will miss many slams, and many chances to dbl 7d when the opponents take a phantom sac opposite a confidently bid 6. The losses from these boards will outstrip gains from being able to bid 7 with this hand. He'll also lose a lot from not being able to bid 5 lest you raise to 6 on your one useful card, if you are taking the position that one should only bid what one can make opposite a yarborough.
When the opponents preempt, give partner some maneuvering room, let him bid some of your cards, assume you have a little help. If he's not allowed to assume you have anything, the opponents will rob you blind.
#15
Posted 2005-March-11, 02:58
mikestar, on Mar 10 2005, 12:18 PM, said:
Partner has been preempted and has no room to ask for a lot of information.
I'll already be pleased to play 6 and don't want to go down in 7 which is catastrophic !!
If there was 7, I can live with it and will congratulate opps for their good preempt
Please also don't forget that with a 1 loser hand, partner can bid 6♦ directly
#16
Posted 2005-March-11, 04:44
It seems likely partner has a 2-suited major takeout for his 4D bid.
So why didn't he follow that with:
A) 5N pick a slam or
B) 6H
WinstonM
#17
Posted 2005-March-11, 10:36
Stephen Tu, on Mar 10 2005, 05:45 PM, said:
Well said.
#18
Posted 2005-March-11, 10:50
Quote
A) 5N pick a slam or
B) 6H
6H should show longer hearts than spades I think. Why not bid 5nt? Without prior discussion, one shouldn't make too many assumptions. Perhaps he just felt 6d was least likely to be misinterpreted, or perhaps he wanted you to declare if you happened to want to bid 6nt. With discussion, perhaps 6d shows longer spades with 5nt showing equal length. Or perhaps 5nt implies tolerance for 6c. Or maybe one sequence invites the grand with 1 cover but not the other.
#19
Posted 2005-March-28, 01:08
Technically you should bid 7, I guess 7D to offer choice. The alternative is 6H, but only if after losing 13 IMPs the match is survivable.
Trixie
#20
Posted 2005-March-28, 08:25
I expect this from partner:
AKJxxx/AQJxxx/-/x
and even 6♥ might be down.

Help

The auction:
W N E S
3D 4D 5D P
P 6D P ?