It is an analysis, by bridgebrowser, of about 85 000 results from OKbridge
(i.e. approximately 2700 boards, each played about 32 times).
It shows the frequency and average IMPS for each possible contract.
Cntrct Nmbr Freq(%) AvgIMPS PassOut 675 0.76 -0.25 1C .... 102 0.12 0.84 1D .... 171 0.19 0.70 1H .... 445 0.50 0.08 1S ... .884 1.00 0.37 1NT .. 5375 6.08 0.13 2C ... 1155 1.31 -0.49 2D ... 1858 2.10 -0.19 2H ... 3987 4.51 0.20 2S ... 4900 5.54 0.21 2NT .. 2612 2.95 -1.15 3C ... 2228 2.52 -0.60 3D ... 2615 2.96 -0.65 3H ... 3817 4.31 -0.49 3S ... 4140 4.68 -0.59 3NT . 16454 18.60 0.50 4C ... 1078 1.22 -0.77 4D ... 1054 1.19 -0.80 4H .. 10513 11.88 0.19 4S .. 12677 14.33 0.19 4NT ... 151 0.17 -1.61 5C ... 1736 1.96 -0.77 5D ... 2169 2.45 -0.63 5H ... 1503 1.70 -1.55 5S ... 1013 1.14 -1.83 5NT .... 23 0.03 -6.08 6C .... 554 0.63 0.88 6D .... 627 0.71 -0.49 6H ... 1238 1.40 -1.00 6S ... 1389 1.57 -0.24 6NT ... 855 0.97 -1.56 7C ..... 45 0.05 -3.99 7D ..... 70 0.08 -1.88 7H .... 118 0.13 1.85 7S .... 148 0.17 1.91 7NT .... 95 0.11 2.89
The author, Stephen Pickett, makes the points that
1) Not counting partscores that count as game when doubled, 51.8% of all contracts are Game (3NT,4H through 5NT), and a further 5.6% are slams (6C and up). Never let it be said that Bridge is boring!
2) The consistently profitable contracts are 1NT, 2H, 2S, 3NT, 4H and 4S.
________________________________________________________________
One question I have is: why do 3H and 3S score minus IMPS, on average?
Is it because declarers have overbid or underbid?
That is, do our bidding systems cause us to overbid to 3H-3S when we should be in 2H-2S?
Or, do our bidding systems cause us to underbid 3H-3S when we should be in 4H-4S?
I think it is an interesting table that provokes a number of questions. Any comments?