BBO Discussion Forums: 2014香港城际桥牌锦标赛:体系的差异 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2014香港城际桥牌锦标赛:体系的差异

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2014-August-02, 16:17

开室

结果:3E= 140

闭室结果:5SX= 550




Slam Hunter队主打自然体系,而开室的平安队牌手主打精确,这就使得在开叫1被加倍后,两边的应叫人的应叫叫品差异明显,其中得失,读者自明吧。最终结果分数差异12imps。
0

#2 User is offline   002012 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 233
  • Joined: 2012-November-13

Posted 2014-August-02, 17:57

5D没有。
0

#3 User is offline   nbxkh 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 371
  • Joined: 2013-July-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:zhejiang china

Posted 2014-August-03, 19:17

防守方是在黑暗中进行的,信号至关重要。这里的H3,不是姿态也不是张数,从明手的牌看,结合叫牌,前两种都可以排除。余下的应该是花色选择信号。
0

#4 User is offline   wuhuan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 2012-October-12

Posted 2014-August-04, 21:52

X后敌方应叫1NT之后跳应3H牌理何在?
0

#5 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2014-August-06, 09:57

 wuhuan, on 2014-August-04, 21:52, said:

X后敌方应叫1NT之后跳应3H牌理何在?


这是约定性的,凡跳皆弱,所以3是阻击性跳应叫,而非邀请。
0

#6 User is offline   wuhuan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 2012-October-12

Posted 2014-August-07, 22:37

 lycier, on 2014-August-06, 09:57, said:

这是约定性的,凡跳皆弱,所以3是阻击性跳应叫,而非邀请。

拜读哈代论技术性加倍同伴的应叫七条准则之5一一局以下水平双跳叫是弱牌阻击,之7一一当加倍后敌方应叫人做了应叫加倍的应叫人再叫不是自由叫品的2阶应只是简单加叫同伴表示过的叫品。
当然我知道体系不同叫牌方式不同但弱跳是否套6+,点力0-5为宜?
0

#7 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2014-August-08, 02:10

一般定义为:2-6hcp,4张以上支持。
不需刻板,灵活一点。
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users