Posted 2014-June-21, 00:10
On the first hand, North's bidding is fine. South's bidding is [questionable - edited to remove term originally used]. The problem lies not with the choice of 1C opener but with South.
I applaud North's 2H raise, but by the same token South should not blindly assume 4 card support, particularly where it has room to clarify. South is certainly not worth game force.
On the second hand, in my view there are two problems with GIB system but neither of them involve the choice of opening bid.
The first problem is that GIB treats a second suit by responder as forcing to 3N. Thus, if West pulls 2C to 2D that shows 12+ TP forcing to 3N. In my view an absurd restriction. One round force is sufficient. That said, West may be too weak even for that.
The second problem is that with the East hand I would have rebid 1N rather than 2C. But I would still have opened 1C.
This post has been edited by diana_eva: 2014-June-23, 03:52
Reason for edit: Edit for content
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m

s

t

r-m

nd

ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq