Re-opening doubles Interesting argument
#1
Posted 2005-February-15, 13:15
#2
Posted 2005-February-15, 13:25
So as much as I like the concept of pass waiting for reopening double, this is not the hand for it. The diamond ACE might provide a parking place for a club loser. The heart singleton might give you two heart ruffs, and since your partenr is short in diamonds (probalby one or two at most), the club QT are very useful.
I actually have visions that this hand is stronger than it appears. But I will bid just 2♠ for now, and will accept a game try if partner makes one. If he moves towards slam, I will also cooperate, but less enthusiastically than towards game.
ben
#3
Posted 2005-February-15, 13:37
I won't pass expecting a double because someone, my pd or my LHO will pull to hearts where are the 12 hearts?
#4
Posted 2005-February-15, 13:40
1. It tells the most important thing of my hand: spade support.
2. It shuts out the heart suit, which opps rate to have.
#5
Posted 2005-February-15, 13:48
#6
Posted 2005-February-15, 14:05
Now I think a 3s bid is pointless and we are fixed to bid 4s just in case it makes, the diamond ace still looks bad but we have a singleton and the club queen so in many contexts 4s might make.
#8
Posted 2005-February-15, 15:50
microcap, on Feb 15 2005, 03:48 PM, said:
4!S
#9
Posted 2005-February-15, 16:36
#12
Posted 2005-February-16, 13:22
#13
Posted 2005-February-16, 13:38
#14
Posted 2005-February-16, 13:39
microcap, on Feb 16 2005, 03:22 PM, said:
Partner has a strong hand that wanted to play 2♦X. Since he is strong, he doesn't have spade support, and since he has gone beyond 3NT he does have heart support. So this is a cue-bid in support of hearts and a strong hand. I would have taken 4♣ as a similar hand but with a club control.
Since I bid first or second round controls up the line, for 4♦ partner has a hand like...
♠-X ♥-KTxx ♦AQxxx ♣Qxx
Note, lack of ACE or king of clubs (no 4♣ bid). Partner may have a doubleton spade of course, but three little clubs in my hand and my poor spade spots (so no club discards from his hand), suggest caution... of course, on a diamond lead, I can throw one club away, and the club king might be where it should be. So 6♥ maybe on ice. My hand is just slightly too strong to signoff at 4♥, I think I will bid 5♣ planning on bidding 5♥ or passing 5♥ if partner bids that. I think (hope) this will encourage him to bid slam with the hand given above, but to stay in five hearts if his hand no better than this...
♠xx ♥-KTxx ♦AQxxx ♣Qx
Biddign 4♦ on the hand shown ealier is just trying to punish partner for not reopening with a double... it says.. "partner you so dumb.. why didn't you reopen with a double"... you will get away with it with a partner who will rebid 4♥ for your to pick a major... but with someone who is trying to guess what 4♦ really means, you are CERTAIN to get to high if you bid like that.
#15
Posted 2005-February-16, 13:43
But I doubt this is standard, and can definitely not be assumed without discussion.
About what to do now: My hand looks great, but it seems to me I have shown this already with 3♥. I just bid 4♥. If partner really has enough useful stuff outside of ♦ to make slam good, he should have bid on the first round.
Arend
#16
Posted 2005-February-16, 14:15
#17
Posted 2005-February-16, 15:28
I also feel it is clear to raise S first time and do not at all agree that the opps have a H fit, not that I would care. Who thinks you are going to do damage to 2D dbled? The overcaller could easily hold 6 strong D with Kx S. I thot the object was to bid what you have in an attempt to reach a game.
If I had a partner who bid 3H I would think he had something to j/s opposite a hand that failed to raise S in addition to making a neg dble.

Help
