BBO Discussion Forums: Deal #29 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Deal #29 J6 AQJT63 A5 A42

#1 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,097
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2014-May-05, 21:39

You are South and dealer. Imps. Unfavorable.


..............................QT97432
..............................void
..............................973
..............................K95
85.......................................................AK
K9542.................................................87
KT84...................................................QJ62
T3.......................................................QJ876
...............................J6
...............................AQJT63
...............................A5
...............................A42
0

#2 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,097
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2014-May-05, 21:41

View Poststraube, on 2014-May-05, 21:39, said:

You are South and dealer. Imps. Unfavorable.


..............................QT97432
..............................void
..............................973
..............................K95
85.......................................................AK
K9542.................................................87
KT84...................................................QJ62
T3.......................................................QJ876
...............................J6
...............................AQJT63
...............................A5
...............................A42


Z-T bids...


1C-1D (16+, 0-7)
2H-2S (minimum, 5+H, natural)
P
0

#3 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-May-05, 22:46

Meckwell-Lite:

1♣ - 1♦ (16; 0-7)
1♥ - 1♠ (Natural 4+, F1; Natural 4+ F1)
2♥ - ?♠ (6+♥, min; )

At this point responder needs to decide whether to take the low road with 2♠ or push with 3♠. The void argues for the low road, but the prospect of a vul. game and the 7-card suit seem to suggest the latter option.
foobar on BBO
0

#4 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,733
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2014-May-05, 22:49

1♣ (16+) - 1♥ (spades)
2♥ (min, 6+ heart, 0-2 spade) - 3♠ (inv, long spades)
4♠
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#5 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,097
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2014-May-05, 23:20

View Postakhare, on 2014-May-05, 22:46, said:

Meckwell-Lite:

1♣ - 1♦ (16; 0-7)
1♥ - 1♠ (Natural 4+, F1; Natural 4+ F1)
2♥ - ?♠ (6+♥, min; )

At this point responder needs to decide whether to take the low road with 2♠ or push with 3♠. The void argues for the low road, but the prospect of a vul. game and the 7-card suit seem to suggest the latter option.



It probably has a different meaning (minors?) in your structure, but I like 1C-1D, 1H-2C, 2H-2S to show 6-7 and 6 spades but with this hand I'd bid 1C-1D, 1H-1S, 2H-3S, 4S because this suggests fewer values and more spades.
0

#6 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,097
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2014-May-05, 23:24

View Postawm, on 2014-May-05, 22:49, said:

1♣ (16+) - 1♥ (spades)
2♥ (min, 6+ heart, 0-2 spade) - 3♠ (inv, long spades)
4♠


Nice inference that opener's 2H bid denies 3 spades. Is your 1C-1H, 2H-3C an artificial GF?
0

#7 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-May-06, 00:08

View Poststraube, on 2014-May-05, 23:20, said:

It probably has a different meaning (minors?) in your structure, but I like 1C-1D, 1H-2C, 2H-2S to show 6-7 and 6 spades but with this hand I'd bid 1C-1D, 1H-1S, 2H-3S, 4S because this suggests fewer values and more spades.


1♣ - 1♦ - 1♥ - 2♣ would have shown (5)6-7 and denied 4♠ or 3♥. The emphasis in this structure is to find fits first and define strength later.
foobar on BBO
0

#8 User is offline   rbforster 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,611
  • Joined: 2006-March-18

Posted 2014-May-06, 05:54

Silent Club:

1♣-1♦ strong; usually 0-7, some GFs
1♥-1♠ waiting, min; waiting 0-7
2♥-2♠ 6+ suit 16-18; 5+ suit invitational
2N-3♠ natural...
4♠-AP a good hand for spades in context
0

#9 User is offline   yunling 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 653
  • Joined: 2012-February-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shenzhen, China
  • Interests:meteorology

Posted 2014-May-06, 11:37

1♥(11-20 5+♥)-2♠(6+♠, 5-8)
P
0

#10 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-May-09, 04:58

Pet two-way pass:

pass 2♠
2NT 3♣
4♠

pass = 0-8 or 15+
2♠ = classic style preempt
2NT = asks (shows 15+ or its a psyche with 0-8!)
3♣ = forget it

2♠ is a judgement call. On this vulnerability 3♠ is too dangerous.

4♠ is a judgement call as well. Even opposite a min, this should have some play for. If opener had a good max, a slam try would follow-up.
0

#11 User is offline   PrecisionL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,025
  • Joined: 2004-March-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Knoxville, TN, USA
  • Interests:Emerald LM (7500+ MP)
    God
    Family
    Counseling
    Bridge
    Statistics

Posted 2014-May-11, 16:18

C3: Copious Canape Club

1♣ (upgraded, 6 controls) - 1♦ (0-7) -
1♥ (forcing, 4+♥ or balanced & 20+) - 1♠ (4+♠ & 0-7, 0-2♥) -
2♥ - 2♠ p p p
Ultra ♣ Relay: see Daniel's web page: https://bridgewithda...19/07/Ultra.pdf
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)

Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape, 2025-6: Canape!
0

#12 User is offline   Lord Molyb 

  • Slightly less bad player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 964
  • Joined: 2012-October-16
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bridge

Posted 2014-May-12, 06:31

P - 1♣
1♥ - 1♠
2♥ - 2♠
P

P = Forcing
1♣ = Asks
1♥ = 15-18 points
1♠ = Not GF, spades
2♥ = nat
2♠ = Signoff
Become yourself.
0

#13 User is offline   antonylee 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 499
  • Joined: 2011-January-19
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-May-15, 22:49

Barely too weak for a Polish 1C IMO. So 1H-1S; 3H-4S (a stab in the dark but passing seems wrong and 3S is not going to help us get out).
0

#14 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2014-May-25, 20:41

1C--1D (15+, pts or H)
1H--2H (1H aat least 3H 15-20, 6S inv or H+S GF)
2NT-4H (accept , texas)
4S-pass
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#15 User is offline   jack502 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 2013-January-29

Posted 2014-May-26, 10:19

1♣ 2♦(semi positive with 5+♠ single suit or 5+♠ + 4+♥
2♠ (minimum) 4♠
0

#16 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,855
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2014-May-27, 03:33

Auction on this is basically natural. I think 4♠ should be reached but there are no guarantees of it being a good contract. No WJSs available after a 1M opening.

1♥ = limited to 17, 5+ hearts, unbal
... - 1NT = weak, 4+ spades
3♥ = 16-17, 6+ hearts, <3 spades
... - 3♠ = nat
4♠
(-: Zel :-)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users