Page 1 of 1
Your call Hand from Wednesday's Open Pairs
#1
Posted 2005-February-03, 14:11
All vulnerable, stratified pairs, pro on left, weak client on right.
1♦ on left, pass by pard, 2♦ (NOT inverted) on right. You try 2♥; 3♦ by the pro, pass, pass....?
Arrrgghhh
KT9x
KQTxxx
K
xx
1♦ on left, pass by pard, 2♦ (NOT inverted) on right. You try 2♥; 3♦ by the pro, pass, pass....?
Arrrgghhh
KT9x
KQTxxx
K
xx
"Phil" on BBO
#2
Posted 2005-February-03, 14:34
7NT. I assume I have all the good cards since you didn't provide them.
Senshu
#3
Posted 2005-February-03, 15:06
Nice thread, no hand, no description of the hand, but still asking what I'll bid
As usual, I'll vote for the missing "OTHER" option...
As usual, I'll vote for the missing "OTHER" option...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#4
Posted 2005-February-03, 15:27
Well if we want to support the Pro's lecture, we bid 3♥, so he can tell his client what happens if you bid your hand twice.
#5
Posted 2005-February-03, 18:08
Pass and let the pro play, they aren't as good as they think, and it is a good chance to demostrate it :-P, double would be nice if it would be taken as penalty
#8
Posted 2005-February-03, 21:11
This is a nice study.... it just goes to show what happens at most tables... people bid without really paying attention to what they hold... why just todyay my partner bid... well... I guess I should say, but is clear he never looked at his hand. How is this any different?
Ben
Ben
--Ben--
#9
Posted 2005-February-03, 23:04
3H, clearcut. (this was posted before the hand showed up, having seen the hand I would pass).
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#10
Posted 2005-February-04, 09:28
i'd pass.. you've heard from partner twice... if he was interested in doubling diamonds, he had his chance... he also had a chance to bid 3h...
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#11
Posted 2005-February-05, 12:51
Darnit; wish I'd post the original hand first.
I really wanted an honest evaluation of the hand, since it was the subject of the first Appeals Committee I've ever sat on.
I really wanted an honest evaluation of the hand, since it was the subject of the first Appeals Committee I've ever sat on.
"Phil" on BBO
#12 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-February-08, 11:22
I would pass when vul. DK is a big warning sign. That being said, over a slow pass of 3D I think bidding would be grossly unethical. Certainly pass is a logical alternative to a bid, and certainly a hesitation over 3D would demonstrably suggest bidding. If the director ruled to roll the contract back to 3D and the offenders appealed, I would assess an appeal without merit warning.
#13
Posted 2005-February-08, 16:57
Pass with the sure knowledge that the sight of my own blood always makes me feel queasy. they are gin for 3nt anyway. What's the is issue?
Page 1 of 1