BBO Discussion Forums: Weird explanation - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Weird explanation A minor issue

#1 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-January-15, 10:21

Not sure bidding a grand on a known finesse is such a hot proposition, but what mostly amused me was the description of bidding the grand as "signoff".
0

#2 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2014-January-15, 11:43

That is a quality description, but I'm afraid it loses out to one recently posted by someone else in which GIB listed a minimum of 14 cards.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#3 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-January-15, 13:31

It's worse than "on a known finesse"; couldn't East hold ♣AJxx instead of ♣AQxx?
0

#4 User is offline   mrdodgy 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 2010-October-20
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-January-15, 22:23

I've seen 7NT described as 'Unusual'.
0

#5 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-January-15, 22:44

View PostBbradley62, on 2014-January-15, 13:31, said:

It's worse than "on a known finesse"; couldn't East hold ♣AJxx instead of ♣AQxx?
I think so, if he had ♥AQx to go with that.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users